Difference between revisions of "Atheism and incoherency"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 78: Line 78:
  
 
*[[Atheism and hell]]
 
*[[Atheism and hell]]
 +
 +
=== Future of the atheist movement ===
 +
 +
*[[Desecularization]]
 +
 +
*[[Decline of the atheist movement]]
 +
 +
*[[Acceleration of 21st century desecularization]]
  
 
== See also ==
 
== See also ==

Revision as of 04:19, July 15, 2019

A common and legitimate criticism of the atheist worldview is that atheism is irrational.[1] See: Atheism and irrationality

Two of the definitions that the Merriam-Webster online dictionary gives for the word incoherent is "lacking orderly continuity, arrangement, or relevance" and "lacking normal clarity or intelligibility in speech or thought".[2] The Collins English dictionary indicates concerning the word incoherent: "If someone is incoherent, they are talking in a confused and unclear way... If you say that something such as a policy is incoherent, you are criticizing it because the different parts of it do not fit together properly."[3]

Atheism is a worldview (see: Atheist worldview).

Ravi Zacharias International Ministries (RZIM) indicates: "Ravi Zacharias defines the four main questions of life: origin, meaning, morality and destiny and the answers to these questions can determine if a worldview is coherent.[4]

Atheism and incoherency videos/articles

Below are some general resources on atheism and incoherency:

Atheism and origins

Atheism and meaning

Atheism and morality

Atheism and destiny

Future of the atheist movement

See also

References

  1. ↑ Atheism by Matt Slick
  2. ↑ Incoherent
  3. ↑ Incoherent, Collins English dictionary]
  4. ↑ A Coherent Worldview by Ravi Zacharias International Ministries website