Difference between revisions of "Talk:COVID-19"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:You make a good point about the proper name of the virus. However, it can be counterproductive to overdo issues re: nomenclature.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 17:39, 30 March 2020 (EDT) | :You make a good point about the proper name of the virus. However, it can be counterproductive to overdo issues re: nomenclature.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 17:39, 30 March 2020 (EDT) | ||
| − | ::The Chinese had no problem with "Wuhan coronavirus" until they decided to blame America for it, which was about a week ago. (They were hoping that the virus would be seen as something local to Wuhan.) As | + | ::The Chinese had no problem with "Wuhan coronavirus" until they decided to blame America for it, which was about a week ago. (They were hoping that the virus would be seen as something local to Wuhan.) As far as the recent edits go, the opening of an article should of course correspond to its title. So long as the title "COVID-19," the article can't open with "Wuhan virus." In addition, I don't think we should call it "China virus" or "CCP virus" anywhere. Yeah, there is German measles and Spanish flu. But that's not how viruses get named in the modern, globalized era. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 23:18, 30 March 2020 (EDT) |
==Chloroquine== | ==Chloroquine== | ||
Watching a live broadcast right now that covers latest developments on chloroquine. The Dr. Zelenko stuff begins about [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i6Gy9nPAQE0 14:23]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|De Plorabus Unum]]</sup> 18:46, 30 March 2020 (EDT) | Watching a live broadcast right now that covers latest developments on chloroquine. The Dr. Zelenko stuff begins about [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i6Gy9nPAQE0 14:23]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|De Plorabus Unum]]</sup> 18:46, 30 March 2020 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 05:35, March 31, 2020
I think this article should be titled Wuhan coronavirus instead, as the current title is the result of the fact that the WHO is owned by Red China, also see previous articles Wuhan coronavirus - Chinese Communist Party response and Global Wuhan coronavirus pandemic. Real45fan (talk) 17:36, 30 March 2020 (EDT)
- You make a good point about the proper name of the virus. However, it can be counterproductive to overdo issues re: nomenclature.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 17:39, 30 March 2020 (EDT)
- The Chinese had no problem with "Wuhan coronavirus" until they decided to blame America for it, which was about a week ago. (They were hoping that the virus would be seen as something local to Wuhan.) As far as the recent edits go, the opening of an article should of course correspond to its title. So long as the title "COVID-19," the article can't open with "Wuhan virus." In addition, I don't think we should call it "China virus" or "CCP virus" anywhere. Yeah, there is German measles and Spanish flu. But that's not how viruses get named in the modern, globalized era. PeterKa (talk) 23:18, 30 March 2020 (EDT)
Chloroquine
Watching a live broadcast right now that covers latest developments on chloroquine. The Dr. Zelenko stuff begins about 14:23. RobSDe Plorabus Unum 18:46, 30 March 2020 (EDT)