Difference between revisions of "Frederick Schwengel"
m |
|||
| Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
[[Category:Former United States Representatives]] | [[Category:Former United States Representatives]] | ||
[[Category:Baptists]] | [[Category:Baptists]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Civil Rights]] | ||
Revision as of 15:43, May 17, 2021
| Frederick Delbert Schwengel | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
| Former U.S. Representative from Iowa's 1st Congressional District From: January 3, 1967 – January 3, 1973 | |||
| Predecessor | John Schmidhauser | ||
| Successor | Edward Mezvinsky | ||
| Former U.S. Representative from Iowa's 1st Congressional District From: January 3, 1955 – January 3, 1965 | |||
| Predecessor | Thomas E. Martin | ||
| Successor | John Schmidhauser | ||
| Information | |||
| Party | Republican | ||
| Religion | Baptist | ||
Frederick Delbert “Fred” Schwengel (May 28, 1906 – April 1, 1993) was a Republican from Iowa who served as the state's U.S. representative from the 1950s to the 1970s, representing the 1st congressional district.
U.S. House of Representatives
Schwengel was first elected to the House in 1954 and re-elected four times.[1] He was narrowly defeated in 1964 when his Democrat opponent John R. Schmidhauser rode President Lyndon Johnson's coattails to victory,[2] though re-emerged the next election cycle and continued to be re-elected several times.
Schwengel was pro-civil rights, voting for the Civil Rights Acts of 1957,[3] 1960,[4] 1964,[5] and 1968.[6]
While a devout Baptist, Schwengel opposed school prayer and helped defeat a constitutional amendment that would have restored it following the Supreme Court ruling Engel v. Vitale. He stated on the matter:
| “ | I think we'd lower the quality of prayer if we let the state write it. | ” |
He was defeated for re-election in 1972 by Democrat Edward Mezvinsky,[7] currently the father-in-law of Chelsea Clinton.
Quotes
| “ | I believe that moderation is a virtue--especially in a democracy of contending interests--and that extremism is a divisive vice ... I have come to the conclusion that moderation is to be recommended above all political philosophies because it alone recognizes the common fate and aspiration of all human beings; it alone understands the influence that drive people to extremes; and finally, moderation alone respects the sacredness of humanity. | ” |
References
- ↑ Schwengel, Fred. Our Campaigns. Retrieved May 17, 2021.
- ↑ IA District 1. Our Campaigns. Retrieved May 17, 2021.
- ↑ HR 6127. CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1957.. GovTrack.us. Retrieved May 17, 2021.
- ↑ HR 8601. CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1960. APPROVAL BY THE HOUSE OF THE SENATE'S AMENDMENTS.. GovTrack.us. Retrieved May 17, 2021.
- ↑ H.R. 7152. CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION (H. RES. 789) PROVIDING FOR HOUSE APPROVAL OF THE BILL AS AMENDED BY THE SENATE.. GovTrack.us. Retrieved May 17, 2021.
- ↑ TO PASS H.R. 2516, A BILL TO ESTABLISH PENALTIES FOR INTERFERENCE WITH CIVIL RIGHTS. INTERFERENCE WITH A PERSON ENGAGED IN ONE OF THE 8 ACTIVITIES PROTECTED UNDER THIS BILL MUST BE RACIALLY MOTIVATED TO INCUR THE BILL'S PENALTIES.. GovTrack.us. Retrieved May 17, 2021.
- ↑ IA Distrct 1. Our Campaigns. Retrieved May 17, 2021.