Difference between revisions of "Talk:Essay:The Problems with Conservapedia"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Conservative (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
::Ok. Game over. Once again, science and facts triump over emotionalism. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:59, October 16, 2021 (EDT) | ::Ok. Game over. Once again, science and facts triump over emotionalism. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:59, October 16, 2021 (EDT) | ||
:::Of course you never understood the point in the first place. Calling groups of people "mutants" is simply inappropriate, '''period'''. Posting such nonsense on the Main Page does this site no good, and will only chase people away. —[[User:Liberaltears|<code><span style="color:black; background:#FFABAB">'''LT'''</span></code>]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|<sup>May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!</sup>]]''''' Sunday, 20:02, October 16, 2021 (EDT) | :::Of course you never understood the point in the first place. Calling groups of people "mutants" is simply inappropriate, '''period'''. Posting such nonsense on the Main Page does this site no good, and will only chase people away. —[[User:Liberaltears|<code><span style="color:black; background:#FFABAB">'''LT'''</span></code>]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|<sup>May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!</sup>]]''''' Sunday, 20:02, October 16, 2021 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::::The Webster-Merriam online dictionary defines mutant thusly: "of, relating to, or produced by mutation".[https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/mutant] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::::Are you denying that the vast majority of atheists believe that the human race would not exist if it were not for mutations? | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::::It looks like your "period" in bold faced font was merely a rhetorical flourish and has no justification whatsoever. And again, show me that atheists do not have a significantly higher mutational load than the religious population of the world. You can't do it. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 20:15, October 16, 2021 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 00:15, October 17, 2021
This essay does bring up some good points. I've recently been particularly irritated with a certain zealous administrator for inserting bigotry on the Main Page comparing atheists and feminists to "mutants." —LTMay D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well! Saturday, 15:28, October 16, 2021 (EDT)
- Show me that I am wrong about atheists having an above average level of mutations. See: Atheists and genetic mutations
- My article ranks #4 for the search "Atheists and genetic mutations" at a popular search engine that begins with a G. Miss G loves my article! It outranks Newsweek's article "Religious People Live Healthier, Longer Lives—While Atheists Collect Mutant Genes" for this search.
- By the way, I am less zealous about confronting the atheist movement in the Western world - now that is dead! See: Decline of the atheist movement
- At the same time, Sun Tzu did write: ""...when we are able to attack, we must seem unable; when using our forces, we must appear inactive; when we are near, we must make the enemy believe we are far away; when far away, we must make him believe we are near." Am I still engaged in anti-atheism efforts online? That is a mystery wrapped in an enigma! Conservative (talk) 19:37, October 16, 2021 (EDT)
- Calling groups of people "mutants" is inappropriate, period. You should know better. —
LTMay D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well! Saturday, 19:39, October 16, 2021 (EDT)
- Calling groups of people "mutants" is inappropriate, period. You should know better. —
- Atheists love genetic mutations! They believe the whole human race would not exist if it were not for mutations. There is a high correlation between belief in evolutionism and atheism. Conservative (talk) 19:48, October 16, 2021 (EDT)
- So all you have now are meaningless deflections. Typical... —
LTMay D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well! Saturday, 19:50, October 16, 2021 (EDT)
- So all you have now are meaningless deflections. Typical... —
You have not refuted my position that atheists have an above average level of mutations. Until you do that, I am not going to take you seriously. Conservative (talk) 19:54, October 16, 2021 (EDT)
- Why should I care if a bigot like you with no credibility takes me seriously or not? —
LTMay D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well! Saturday, 19:56, October 16, 2021 (EDT)- Ok. Game over. Once again, science and facts triump over emotionalism. Conservative (talk) 19:59, October 16, 2021 (EDT)
- Of course you never understood the point in the first place. Calling groups of people "mutants" is simply inappropriate, period. Posting such nonsense on the Main Page does this site no good, and will only chase people away. —
LTMay D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well! Sunday, 20:02, October 16, 2021 (EDT)- The Webster-Merriam online dictionary defines mutant thusly: "of, relating to, or produced by mutation".[1]
- Of course you never understood the point in the first place. Calling groups of people "mutants" is simply inappropriate, period. Posting such nonsense on the Main Page does this site no good, and will only chase people away. —
- Ok. Game over. Once again, science and facts triump over emotionalism. Conservative (talk) 19:59, October 16, 2021 (EDT)
- Are you denying that the vast majority of atheists believe that the human race would not exist if it were not for mutations?
- It looks like your "period" in bold faced font was merely a rhetorical flourish and has no justification whatsoever. And again, show me that atheists do not have a significantly higher mutational load than the religious population of the world. You can't do it. Conservative (talk) 20:15, October 16, 2021 (EDT)