Difference between revisions of "User talk:Jackin the box"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Re: Vaccine: reply) |
(→Re: Vaccine: reply) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:::Yet the edits you made were pro-CCP flu "vaccines", which is supported by liberals based squarely on politics, ideology and pseudo-science (and thus makes those edits pushing of a liberal POV). [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 11:46, February 20, 2022 (EST) | :::Yet the edits you made were pro-CCP flu "vaccines", which is supported by liberals based squarely on politics, ideology and pseudo-science (and thus makes those edits pushing of a liberal POV). [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 11:46, February 20, 2022 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::::You made mention of edit warring in your latest edit summary - but that was edit warring which you started for the sake of imposing a liberal/pro CCP flu "vaccine" POV. Next POV edit you make, you get blocked for a day. [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 13:09, February 20, 2022 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 18:09, February 20, 2022
Thanks for your suggestions!--Andy Schlafly (talk) 14:24, January 17, 2022 (EST)
Re: Vaccine
You need to stop making edits in the Vaccine article that continually attempt to force a liberal/pro-CCP flu "vaccine"/not legitimately sourced viewpoint on it. Northwest (talk) 11:17, February 20, 2022 (EST)
- What rubbish Northwest. See my comments at Talk:Vaccine#Recent reverts. I'm not a liberal, by the way. To repeat, my edits were based on reliable sources, and included much supported by other pages on Conservapedia, —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jackin the box (talk)