Difference between revisions of "User talk:RobSmith"

Revision as of 03:29, September 12, 2023

I expalined my edit in terms of the lede of Dark Triad personality traits

I explained my edit in terms of the lede of Dark Triad personality traits.

I refined the definition and I also added the Britannica footnote. Conservative (talk) 20:51, September 11, 2023 (EDT)

I thought you weren't talking to me (I have a zillion diffs of you saying so). What obligation do I have to even review your trolling edits in Mainspace since you refuse to discuss on the talk page? RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 21:00, September 11, 2023 (EDT)

You are not making any sense. Why are you against the Britannica refinement of the term Dark Triad personality traits. It agrees with the psychiatric/psychological literature.

Edits should be reasonable. Conservative (talk) 21:06, September 11, 2023 (EDT)

You have refused to discuss on talk; I am not obligated to waste my time reviewing your trolling edits in Mainspace. Period.

Does it make sense now? RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 21:18, September 11, 2023 (EDT)

Please note: I did make edits to the talk page.

An admission and accepting of some fault: And we did improve the articles via our talk page edits. I elaborated more on what "drama" is. I could have been more prompt in relation to this I admit. But I thought the term "drama" in relation to psychology and/or bad/toxic behavior is widely known and needed no explanation. But it turns out that adding the extra verbiage/quote did further clarify. Conservative (talk) 22:16, September 11, 2023 (EDT)

Psychology articles

I sent Andy, another Conservapedian and you an email which is a copy of my recent post to Andy's talk page. Conservative (talk) 21:34, September 11, 2023 (EDT)

Re: Your recent edits to the psychology articles

The last time I pushed hard for you to be disciplined, I was successful. I prefer not to push hard again and for you to behave more reasonably and cordially.

I did push very hard for you to not be banned when Karajou was pushing very hard for it. It made a difference and you were not banned.

All I ask is that you source your material and behave cordially. That is not too much to ask for in relation to the psychology articles and other articles. Conservative (talk) 22:10, September 11, 2023 (EDT)

My psychology article editing: My interest in psychology, the psychology articles and abnormal psychology/pathology

One of the reasons I created articles and expanded articles as far as the Conservapedia psychology articles is due to my professional life.

I work as a Producer/booker for a leading podcast (top 1/2 percent of all podcasts in listenership). And one of the areas we cover is the true crime genre. I find criminology and psychological pathology interesting. And I enjoy listening to the podcasts of the people I book in the true crime area - especially the authors who went into the cells of prisoners to interview them or did detailed analyses of these criminals.

In addition, I work in some fields where one has to very much understand human behavior in order to be successful.

So I lot of my editing in these areas was related to my personal interest and study/knowledge of these areas. Conservative (talk) 22:32, September 11, 2023 (EDT)

Your material related to the Third Reich and Donbas was interesting

Your material related to the Third Reich and Donbas was interesting. I know you have an interest in Russia.

As far as I covered the material on abnormal psychology that I thought was interesting. So I don't expect to create any more content in this area. Any new content related to psychology will be related to cognitive psychology (learning) or psychology related to motivation, self-control, conscientiousness. In other words, psychology related to human performance.

My friend told me that your past material on communism and the Soviet Union was informative material. Conservative (talk) 23:29, September 11, 2023 (EDT)

@@ Line 54: / Line 54: @@
 So I lot of my editing in these areas was related to my personal interest and study/knowledge of these areas. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:32, September 11, 2023 (EDT)
+== Your material related to the Third Reich and Donbas was interesting ==
+Your material related to the Third Reich and Donbas was interesting. I know you have an interest in Russia.
+As far as I covered the material on abnormal psychology that I thought was interesting. So I don't expect to create any more content in this area. Any new content related to psychology will be related to cognitive psychology (learning) or psychology related to motivation, self-control, conscientiousness. In other words, psychology related to human performance.
+My friend told me that your past material on communism and the Soviet Union was informative material. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 23:29, September 11, 2023 (EDT)