Difference between revisions of "Talk:Boneface McClellan"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by Conservative (talk) to last revision by RobSmith) |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:::Yeah, man. They checked his prison & probation records and his extensive time-stamped & geo-tagged social media posting. Turns out Boneface could give you a run for your money in the crazy fantasist stakes. Well played, moron. [[User:ConwayIII|ConwayIII]] ([[User talk:ConwayIII|talk]]) 12:22, September 15, 2023 (EDT) | :::Yeah, man. They checked his prison & probation records and his extensive time-stamped & geo-tagged social media posting. Turns out Boneface could give you a run for your money in the crazy fantasist stakes. Well played, moron. [[User:ConwayIII|ConwayIII]] ([[User talk:ConwayIII|talk]]) 12:22, September 15, 2023 (EDT) | ||
{{Hide collapse | {{Hide collapse | ||
| − | |reason=Off topic | + | |reason=Off topic. Something about "happiness. The editor doesn't know the difference between intelligence and politics. |
|content=::::Arthur C. Brooks wrote in his article ''Reading Too Much Political News Is Bad for Your Well-Being'': "A 2012 survey conducted by Fairleigh Dickinson University asked a sample of Americans about their news-consumption habits, and quizzed them about U.S. and international political and economic events. They found that those watching the most partisan television news sources—on both the [[leftism|left]] and the [[right-wing|right]]—were often less knowledgeable about world events than those who consumed no news at all."[https://www.theatlantic.com/family/archive/2020/10/reading-too-much-political-news-bad-happiness/616651/] | |content=::::Arthur C. Brooks wrote in his article ''Reading Too Much Political News Is Bad for Your Well-Being'': "A 2012 survey conducted by Fairleigh Dickinson University asked a sample of Americans about their news-consumption habits, and quizzed them about U.S. and international political and economic events. They found that those watching the most partisan television news sources—on both the [[leftism|left]] and the [[right-wing|right]]—were often less knowledgeable about world events than those who consumed no news at all."[https://www.theatlantic.com/family/archive/2020/10/reading-too-much-political-news-bad-happiness/616651/] | ||
Revision as of 18:42, September 15, 2023
The right-wing Kent "Boneface" McClennan narrative might be total hype
- US neo-Nazi says He Fought in Ukraine, Records Place Him in Florida and Inside the Neo-Nazi Trial of 'Boneface', the Man They Think Made Them Look Bad
Perhaps some due diligence is in order. Conservative (talk) 11:49, September 15, 2023 (EDT)
- Yeah, RobSmith has a history of knowingly publishing false information, so his insertions at this point are no longer reliable. —
LTRev. 22:13 Friday, 11:53, September 15, 2023 (EDT)
- Bellingcat? Seriously? RobSGive Peace a Chance! 11:57, September 15, 2023 (EDT)
Bellingcat
- Jimmy Dore: CBS 60 Minutes profiled Eliot Higgins, founder of the “journalism” outlet Bellingcat. Bellingcat performs a specific kind of investigative journalism – which also happen to be the governments that fund Bellingcat, i.e. it is not "journalism". If it's funded by government, it is propaganda.
- Grayzone: Bellingcat funded by US and UK intelligence contractors.
- RobSGive Peace a Chance! 13:20, September 15, 2023 (EDT)
- What about the Larry Johnson material? RobSGive Peace a Chance! 13:52, September 15, 2023 (EDT)