Difference between revisions of "Talk:Anti-Defamation League"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
m
Line 15: Line 15:
 
:::::::That's not a debate I'm going to get into now. My point is, if the Executive Intelligence Review or larouchepubs have any factual evidence or information, it should be corroborated and available by other reputable publishers ''not'' directly linked to the LaRouche organization (even if it it's the same author). That's what I mean by going underground, and those are the sources that should be linked to (even if the material is somewhat speculative).
 
:::::::That's not a debate I'm going to get into now. My point is, if the Executive Intelligence Review or larouchepubs have any factual evidence or information, it should be corroborated and available by other reputable publishers ''not'' directly linked to the LaRouche organization (even if it it's the same author). That's what I mean by going underground, and those are the sources that should be linked to (even if the material is somewhat speculative).
  
−
:::::::Right now, two reporters and commentators on the [[Donbas]] war, [[Eva K. Bartlett]] and [[Col Richard Black]], are suffering extreme censorship due to their associations with the Schiller Institute. If anything they say can is factual or true, it should be available from other online publishers. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]</sup> 13:27, July 7, 2024 (EDT)
+
:::::::Right now, two reporters and commentators on the [[Donbas]] war, [[Eva K. Bartlett]] and [[Col Richard Black]], are suffering extreme censorship due to their associations with the Schiller Institute. If anything they say is factual or true, it should be available from other online publishers. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]</sup> 13:27, July 7, 2024 (EDT)

Revision as of 17:30, July 7, 2024

Lyndon LaRouche. OMG, here we go again. RobSThe Truth. Just Putin It Out There 12:52, July 7, 2024 (EDT)

Was he wrong, though? —LT Rev. 22:13 Sunday, 12:58, July 7, 2024 (EDT)
For one, LaRouche was the real American conservative the whole time, representing the continuation of Hamiltonian economics in contrast to the Anglo-Masonic scam of "laissez-faire" "free-market capitalist" fascistic financial enslavement. Modern "conservatives" are economically illiterate, not realizing that the rabidly pro-slavery Jacksonian Democrats were laissez-faire because zero government regulation meant no obstacle stopping their (economic) slave trade. —LT Rev. 22:13 Sunday, 13:01, July 7, 2024 (EDT)
Also, EIR was proven right about neo-Nazi "James Anderson" being none other than ADL agent provocateur Jimmy Rosenberg. Jeffrey Kaplan confirmed this in "The Cultic Milieu." —LT Rev. 22:13 Sunday, 13:03, July 7, 2024 (EDT)
(ec) larouchpub and the Schiller Institute (and anybody associated with it) are virtually universally blacklisted by Big Tech. It's a long story. You'll get CP backlisted if you start linking to the stuff, probably quicker than RT or the Kremlin. RobSThe Truth. Just Putin It Out There 13:04, July 7, 2024 (EDT)
Oh well, Conservapedia is dead anyways. —LT Rev. 22:13 Sunday, 13:04, July 7, 2024 (EDT)
Well, heads up. It's got to come out sooner or later.
Most "Larouche editors" have gone underground (Wikipedia, which is the entity that developed community standards for content and behavior copied and tweeked by all other major social media platforms, developed its standards for blocking and censorship based on what they collectively termed, "larouche editors". Once you get branded that, your goose is cooked. RobSThe Truth. Just Putin It Out There 13:12, July 7, 2024 (EDT)
it reminds the "palestine" organized anti-Israel club at Wikipedia.Telling (talk)
Fine. The record nonetheless stands that the LaRouchies are factually vindicated. —LT Rev. 22:13 Sunday, 13:17, July 7, 2024 (EDT)
That's not a debate I'm going to get into now. My point is, if the Executive Intelligence Review or larouchepubs have any factual evidence or information, it should be corroborated and available by other reputable publishers not directly linked to the LaRouche organization (even if it it's the same author). That's what I mean by going underground, and those are the sources that should be linked to (even if the material is somewhat speculative).
Right now, two reporters and commentators on the Donbas war, Eva K. Bartlett and Col Richard Black, are suffering extreme censorship due to their associations with the Schiller Institute. If anything they say is factual or true, it should be available from other online publishers. RobSThe Truth. Just Putin It Out There 13:27, July 7, 2024 (EDT)