Difference between revisions of "Talk:Obamagate timeline 2009-2014"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 11: Line 11:
  
 
:So yes, I like your idea. How would it be done? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''CIA v Trump updated score'':CIA 3, Trump 2]]</sup> 01:34, 18 April 2017 (EDT)
 
:So yes, I like your idea. How would it be done? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''CIA v Trump updated score'':CIA 3, Trump 2]]</sup> 01:34, 18 April 2017 (EDT)
 +
 +
==[[User:Conservative proven wrong]], [https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:WhatLinksHere/User:Conservative_proven_wrong AGAIN]==
 +
[[User:Conservative]] has misrepresented the views of Rear Admiral [[James Stavridis]] is his more than 4 dozen [[warmongering]] [[troll]] screeds.
 +
 +
*On March 2, 2025 the ''[[London Telegraph]]'' reported former Supreme Allied Commander [[US Navy]] Four Star Admiral [[James Stavridis]] said that since the [[Trump administration]] made it clear that '''[[Ukraine aid|aid to Kyiv]] could become a "[[geopolitical]] miscalculation of colossal proportions....We may be witnessing the last days of [[NATO]]".'''<ref>[https://archive.is/QrPQA End of Nato alliance could be ‘days away’, warns former commander], Cameron Henderson, ''[[The Telegraph]]'', 01 March 2025. www.telegraph.co.uk</ref>
 +
*Whenever a rising power (in this case [[China]]) confronts an established power (the [[U.S.]]) over the past two thousand years, the outcome very often leads to a global conflict. This occurs despite the fact that in most cases there is no advantage to either side in launching into a [[war]].<ref>[https://time.com/5945178/sleepwalk-war-with-china/ How the U.S. Could Sleepwalk into a War with China], [[James Stavridis]] and Elliot Ackerman, ''[[TIME magazine]]'', Mar 9, 2021. </ref>
 +
{{reflist}}

Revision as of 17:29, May 22, 2026

Perhaps this page is suffering from scope creep. When it started, I could see a connection between the timeline entries and the Obamagate controversy. Some of the recent entries, although covering facts about the Obama administration, do not seem to be connected to Obamagate. Are we accidentally drifting into a "Timeline of the Obama Administration"? Would it help to color code each entry as to which aspect of Obamagate is addressed? Thanks, JDano (talk) 05:20, 17 April 2017 (EDT)

You're right. We're probably looking at another split at some point but I'm not sure how to do it. Im trying to collect all the scandals in one spot right now. Even the term 'Obamagate', the Weekly Standard and Breibart used as early as 2013, and it was confusing ev3n then.
Here's a short list of basic scandals:
  • IRS
  • Fast and Furious
  • Birth certificate controvercy
  • Benghazi
  • Syria
  • Wiretapping.
So yes, I like your idea. How would it be done? RobSCIA v Trump updated score:CIA 3, Trump 2 01:34, 18 April 2017 (EDT)

User:Conservative proven wrong, AGAIN

User:Conservative has misrepresented the views of Rear Admiral James Stavridis is his more than 4 dozen warmongering troll screeds.

  • On March 2, 2025 the London Telegraph reported former Supreme Allied Commander US Navy Four Star Admiral James Stavridis said that since the Trump administration made it clear that aid to Kyiv could become a "geopolitical miscalculation of colossal proportions....We may be witnessing the last days of NATO".[1]
  • Whenever a rising power (in this case China) confronts an established power (the U.S.) over the past two thousand years, the outcome very often leads to a global conflict. This occurs despite the fact that in most cases there is no advantage to either side in launching into a war.[2]
  1. ↑ End of Nato alliance could be ‘days away’, warns former commander, Cameron Henderson, The Telegraph, 01 March 2025. www.telegraph.co.uk
  2. ↑ How the U.S. Could Sleepwalk into a War with China, James Stavridis and Elliot Ackerman, TIME magazine, Mar 9, 2021.
Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Obamagate_timeline_2009-2014&oldid=2195491"