Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia:Featured articles"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 106: Line 106:
 
:* Agree tentatively, although would it be possible to expand more on the artist's life? --[[User:JessicaT|KotomiT]]<sup>[[User talk:JessicaT|''nandeyanen?'']]</sup> 07:24, 18 March 2009 (EDT)
 
:* Agree tentatively, although would it be possible to expand more on the artist's life? --[[User:JessicaT|KotomiT]]<sup>[[User talk:JessicaT|''nandeyanen?'']]</sup> 07:24, 18 March 2009 (EDT)
 
}}
 
}}
−
{{fa|Essay:The Coming Fifth Great Awakening in America|
+
{{fa|Essay:The Coming Fifth Great Awakening in America|hide=yes|
 
:* Disagree. (''It is a very good article, well written and reasoned. My primary concern, looking at it within the context of the featured article is that it is more of an "opinion piece" and I felt that on those grounds it did not really suit my criteria for a "featured article". Where I do think it could be used, would be under the mainpage's "Highlighted article", which would mean that not only could it be featured for longer, but would be more in line with the aims of that section.'')--[[User:JessicaT|KotomiT]]<sup>[[User talk:JessicaT|''nandeyanen?'']]</sup> 03:19, 7 April 2009 (EDT)
 
:* Disagree. (''It is a very good article, well written and reasoned. My primary concern, looking at it within the context of the featured article is that it is more of an "opinion piece" and I felt that on those grounds it did not really suit my criteria for a "featured article". Where I do think it could be used, would be under the mainpage's "Highlighted article", which would mean that not only could it be featured for longer, but would be more in line with the aims of that section.'')--[[User:JessicaT|KotomiT]]<sup>[[User talk:JessicaT|''nandeyanen?'']]</sup> 03:19, 7 April 2009 (EDT)
 
:* Agree. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 09:55, 7 April 2009 (EDT)
 
:* Agree. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 09:55, 7 April 2009 (EDT)
Line 113: Line 113:
 
:* Agree. Excellent proposal. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez|Joaquín Martínez]] 08:35, 8 April 2009 (EDT)
 
:* Agree. Excellent proposal. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez|Joaquín Martínez]] 08:35, 8 April 2009 (EDT)
 
}}
 
}}
−
{{fa|Prime number|
+
{{fa|Prime number|hide=yes|
 
:* Agree. Probably the most exemplary article on how to pitch math at multiple levels of understanding. -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 18:32, 12 March 2009 (EDT)
 
:* Agree. Probably the most exemplary article on how to pitch math at multiple levels of understanding. -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 18:32, 12 March 2009 (EDT)
 
:* Agree. --[[User:JessicaT|KotomiT]]<sup>[[User talk:JessicaT|''nandeyanen?'']]</sup> 07:24, 18 March 2009 (EDT)
 
:* Agree. --[[User:JessicaT|KotomiT]]<sup>[[User talk:JessicaT|''nandeyanen?'']]</sup> 07:24, 18 March 2009 (EDT)
Line 119: Line 119:
 
:* Agree. --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 14:07, 2 April 2009 (EDT)
 
:* Agree. --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 14:07, 2 April 2009 (EDT)
 
}}
 
}}
−
{{fa|Pat Tillman|
+
{{fa|Pat Tillman|hide=yes|
 
:* Agree. It would not be the lengthiest article but good nonetheless--[[User:Jpatt|jpatt]] 01:47, 17 March 2009 (EDT)
 
:* Agree. It would not be the lengthiest article but good nonetheless--[[User:Jpatt|jpatt]] 01:47, 17 March 2009 (EDT)
 
:* Agree. I like the idea of highlighting the "unsung" heroes. --[[User:JessicaT|KotomiT]]<sup>[[User talk:JessicaT|''nandeyanen?'']]</sup> 06:30, 17 March 2009 (EDT)
 
:* Agree. I like the idea of highlighting the "unsung" heroes. --[[User:JessicaT|KotomiT]]<sup>[[User talk:JessicaT|''nandeyanen?'']]</sup> 06:30, 17 March 2009 (EDT)

Revision as of 01:30, May 3, 2009

Featured articles

Committee members

The Featured articles are posted on the Main Page each week.

Articles may be submitted to the list of featured articles by listing them on the talk page. Please add them to the end of the list.

Articles will normally be featured in the order listed, but the order may be changed by the committee in some cases.

    • Articles listed here will be considered for featuring and voted on by the committee members. Editors may offer their own comments (on the talk page) and are welcome to help improve the listed articles!


Past articles

Featured articles. Past articles. 2007/08

because of his 200 years anniversary.

Current article


Future articles

The following articles should be checked for any improvements that can be made before they are posted to the Main Page.

Proposed for featuring

The following articles will probably be moved to the list above in the order listed if nobody has any objection or alternative suggestion.

New suggestions can be added at the end of this list.

  • Agree. Resubmitting. Editor has put a tremendous amount of effort into this and has fixed the red-links, which led to its previous exclusion. --KotomiTnandeyanen? 04:40, 30 March 2009 (EDT)
  • Agree. --DeanStalk 10:46, 30 March 2009 (EDT)
  • Agree. --₮K/Admin/Talk 14:07, 2 April 2009 (EDT)
  • Agree. Geoff PlourdeComplain! 20:24, 19 April 2009 (EDT)
  • Agree. --RJJensen 03:51, 20 April 2009 (EDT)
  • Agree. --KotomiTnandeyanen? 03:19, 7 April 2009 (EDT)
  • Agree. --DeanStalk 17:52, 10 April 2009 (EDT)
  • Disagree. Before moving on to European Football, I think we should feature American Baseball, Football or Basketball. --₮K/Admin/Talk 06:28, 8 April 2009 (EDT)
  • Agree. Geoff PlourdeComplain! 20:24, 19 April 2009 (EDT)
  • Agree. European emphasis is a good idea and will challenge the American sports fans. --RJJensen 03:51, 20 April 2009 (EDT)


  • Agree. --₮K/Admin/Talk 14:07, 2 April 2009 (EDT)
  • Agree. --DeanStalk 09:55, 7 April 2009 (EDT)
  • Agree. Now that it has one of my favorite crosses. --Foxtrot 06:43, 8 April 2009 (EDT)
  • Disagree. List of crosses is incomplete. Geoff PlourdeComplain! 20:10, 19 April 2009 (EDT)
  • Disagree. It is lacking any explanation of how the various crosses came about, or their history (for e.g. why the Cross of Lorainne has two beams). Also, what about things like the Cross of St. Andrew? --KotomiTnandeyanen? 03:30, 20 April 2009 (EDT) Improved. --Joaquín Martínez 09:54, 26 April 2009 (EDT)
  • Disgree. needs deeper history; artwork is ok but more is needed, & it should be dated and related to schools of art. --RJJensen 03:51, 20 April 2009 (EDT)

Past Nominations

The following articles were proposed and determined not to be suitable for featuring. If the article has been improved to the point where it is of sufficient quality to be featured, move it back to Proposed for Featuring. Click the show link after each entry to see why it was rejected.

Conservapedia:Featured articles/Past Nominations 08-09