Difference between revisions of "Green energy"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Subsidies)
(In some cases liberals stop promoting certain types of alternative energy once it becomes efficient, which suggests that some of the push for green energy is due to an underlying opposition to life-pr)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
'''Green energy''' consists of renewable energy sources such as [[solar cells]] and [[windmill]]s. It is typically less efficient than more traditional energy sources, such as fossil fuels. This does not hinder liberals to heavily promote green energy. Even though some forms of generating green energy (for instance via solar cells) actually cost more energy to produce, than they will ever deliver.<br />
+
'''Green energy''' -- often a misnomer -- consists of renewable energy sources such as solar cells and [[windmill]]s, which may cause more harm to the environment than traditional energy sources or nuclear energy.
 +
 
 +
Green energy is almost always less efficient than fossil fuels and nuclear energy, and almost always promoted by liberals despite the senselessness of it.
 +
 
 +
In some cases liberals stop promoting certain types of alternative energy once it becomes efficient, which suggests that some of the push for green energy is due to an underlying opposition to life-promoting energy.
 +
 
 +
This does not hinder liberals to heavily promote green energy. Even though some forms of generating green energy (for instance via solar cells) actually cost more energy to produce, than they will ever deliver.<br />
 
Green energy is also (unlike [[nuclear power]]) very unreliable: solar cells need bright weather to produce energy and windmills need wind to produce power. They rely on a climatical variable, while nuclear power relies on the constant of [[nuclear physics]].
 
Green energy is also (unlike [[nuclear power]]) very unreliable: solar cells need bright weather to produce energy and windmills need wind to produce power. They rely on a climatical variable, while nuclear power relies on the constant of [[nuclear physics]].
  

Revision as of 05:08, February 14, 2012

Green energy -- often a misnomer -- consists of renewable energy sources such as solar cells and windmills, which may cause more harm to the environment than traditional energy sources or nuclear energy.

Green energy is almost always less efficient than fossil fuels and nuclear energy, and almost always promoted by liberals despite the senselessness of it.

In some cases liberals stop promoting certain types of alternative energy once it becomes efficient, which suggests that some of the push for green energy is due to an underlying opposition to life-promoting energy.

This does not hinder liberals to heavily promote green energy. Even though some forms of generating green energy (for instance via solar cells) actually cost more energy to produce, than they will ever deliver.
Green energy is also (unlike nuclear power) very unreliable: solar cells need bright weather to produce energy and windmills need wind to produce power. They rely on a climatical variable, while nuclear power relies on the constant of nuclear physics.

Green energy technology companies receive billions of dollars in government subsidies, which are arranged by liberal politicians. Much of this goes towards the development of unproven or ineffective technology. Green energy jobs are generally not permanent, lasting only as long as the subsidies that support them. Some Republicans may be accused of being in the pocket of Big Oil, but it is clear that Democrats are in the pocket of Big Green Energy.[1]

References

  1. ↑ The Lonely Conservative. "Big Green Energy is the Real Corporate Welfare Queen." August 25, 2010. http://lonelyconservative.com/2010/08/big-green-energy-is-the-real-corporate-welfare-queen/