Talk:Essay: Even if Donald Trump is elected in 2024, he will NOT hammer China with high tariffs. And the USA and other countries currently raising tariffs on China is FAKE NEWS

If anyone disagrees with this essay, they should the Essay:Donald Trump was not lying and bluffing when he threatened to impose tariffs to force trade negotiations.

Today, you attempted to get me interested in tariffs in an impolite matter. Namely, forcing it on my user page. However, the adage that you catch more flies with honey than vinegar remains true when it comes to interpersonal relations. You can't expect people to drop everything and immediately be interested in what you are interested in. And trying to force things on people is a sure recipe for failure to gain their interest.

I am aware that Donald Trump has imposed some new tariffs on China that could go into effect on Febuary 10, 2025 (Unless they are cancelled or postoned). In addition, the Trump administration has indicated that they may slowly ramp up tariffs when it comes to putting tariffs on nations.

With that being said, Andy sometimes posts material on economics and there are plenty of political/economics avenues on the web to discuss politics/economics such as Twitter, Reddit and forum websites. If you want to have discussion about tariffs, I suggest using those avenues. Conservative (talk) 16:23, February 4, 2025 (EST)

You are actively trolling now: "If you want to share your political opinions with others, I have no problem with that. Just don't do it with me as I have no interest. There are plenty of venues such as Twitter, Reddit and political forums where you can opine with others about your political opinions." [1] RobS^{Zelensky must go.} 16:29, February 4, 2025 (EST)

"You can't expect people to drop everything and immediately be interested in what you are interested in." Of really? Weren't you politely asked to place the fact tag at Talk:Bill Browder, but have used your refusal to do so to spread malicious smears and ad hominems against another editor, repeatedly, both on wiki and in the sysop email group for years now? RobS^{Zelensky must go.} 16:36, February 4, 2025 (EST)

As far as the article about the businessman Sir Bill Browder (He recently received a knighthood), I am not going to talk about that train wreck of an article. And when you force your political opinions on someone's user page, don't be surprised when it has the result of the person having less than zero interest concerning your political opinions. Because that is certainly the effect it had on me. I simply reverted your post wihout reading it and now I have less than zero interest in your political opinions.

Lastly, I also have zero interest in getting involved in internet drama - especially when someone is acting unreasonably and ranting about various claims they do not support. So feel free to engage in any last wordism. Conservative (talk) 16:52, February 4, 2025 (EST)

Hey, I'm not PZ Myers or Trent Toulouse, and I'm not gonna put up your with BS. RobS^{Zelensky must go.} 16:55, February 4, 2025 (EST)

And it only makes sense that you would be impressed by a tax cheat who gave up his American citizenship to flee to London to avoid paying US taxes, returned to bribe McCain & Obama to pass Russian sanctions, and now is called Sir Bill Browder for his service in looting Russian wealth and becoming a Western oligarch. In your bigoted mind, I'm sure it makes sense. RobS^{Zelensky must go.} 17:03, February 4, 2025 (EST)

well duh (again)

US Court of International Trade just declared Trump's global trade war UNCONSTITUTIONAL

🔻 NO 30% tariffs on China
🔻 NO 25% tariffs on Canada/Mexico
🔻 NO 10% universal "tax on the world"

OK smart guy, Are you going to help walk back all your spam or are you going to leave all the big smelly turds you dropped all over Conservapedia for others to clean up?

• Federal Trade Court Rules President Trump Cannot Initiate Tariffs Under International Emergency Economic Powers Act, All Tariffs Blocked.

User:Conservative: Did you bother studying this issue before you went off half-cocked again?

Are you going to follow up reporting by following the case to SCOTUS, if it ever gets there, or are you going to leave our conservative readers hanging with your propaganda BS again, proving how unreliable Conservapedia is as a source?

Or do you care that Trump's "Most Beautiful Word in the English Language" is illegal?

Is it any wonder why your writings help create the impression that Conservatives are unreasonable, illogical, stupid and fascist, not just the way you handle your material, but your arguments in support or (lack of) defense?

Even people who are no more than just "cheerleaders" of conservative causes should be attractive and sexy, not just mindless over-stuffed slobbering dimwitted nitwits. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 21:07, May 28, 2025 (EDT)