Difference between revisions of "User talk:LSimons"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Reply to LSimons)
Line 15: Line 15:
 
What Dominion Voting Systems did to protect itself by smearing those who correctly accused the company of facilitating vote fraud (with evidence to back up the accusations) and resorting to [[lawfare]] against its accusers to attempt to silence them is nothing short of unethical (at the very least) as well as an attempt to simultaneously excuse, justify and deny its criminal behavior.  Making excuses for Dominion's criminal actions is tantamount to supporting said actions and, by extension, supporting crime as well, which falls right into the realm of liberal POV.  [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 21:10, March 26, 2022 (EDT)
 
What Dominion Voting Systems did to protect itself by smearing those who correctly accused the company of facilitating vote fraud (with evidence to back up the accusations) and resorting to [[lawfare]] against its accusers to attempt to silence them is nothing short of unethical (at the very least) as well as an attempt to simultaneously excuse, justify and deny its criminal behavior.  Making excuses for Dominion's criminal actions is tantamount to supporting said actions and, by extension, supporting crime as well, which falls right into the realm of liberal POV.  [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 21:10, March 26, 2022 (EDT)
 
:At least 86 judges, nominated by Democrats and Republicans, including President Donald Trump, from the lowest level state courts to the U.S. Supreme Court, rejected lawsuits filed by Trump and his supporters contesting the election result. Yet here you are brazenly insisting Dominion is exercising criminal behavior. I am not making excuses for the mythical criminal actions you are directing at Dominion. If you are correct, why didn’t Trump and his lawyers succeed at any of their lawsuits? I’d like an answer to my question. Is it alright if I post an edit to the American Thinker article that comes exclusively from their website? Or would that be ‘liberal POV’?--[[User:LSimons|LSimons]] ([[User talk:LSimons|talk]]) 23:26, March 26, 2022 (EDT)
 
:At least 86 judges, nominated by Democrats and Republicans, including President Donald Trump, from the lowest level state courts to the U.S. Supreme Court, rejected lawsuits filed by Trump and his supporters contesting the election result. Yet here you are brazenly insisting Dominion is exercising criminal behavior. I am not making excuses for the mythical criminal actions you are directing at Dominion. If you are correct, why didn’t Trump and his lawyers succeed at any of their lawsuits? I’d like an answer to my question. Is it alright if I post an edit to the American Thinker article that comes exclusively from their website? Or would that be ‘liberal POV’?--[[User:LSimons|LSimons]] ([[User talk:LSimons|talk]]) 23:26, March 26, 2022 (EDT)
 +
::First off, it wasn't necessary to post the same answer on both your user talk page and mine.
 +
 +
::Second, all of those judges in question either willingly sided with the Democrats, were bought off by them or were intimidated by them into rejecting Trump's lawsuits because of one thing and one thing only - the Democrats, being the power-mad elitists and criminals they are and have been since 1828, wanted Trump out of the way because he stood in their way of consolidating absolute power and control over the American public and the elimination of the Constitution which limits the Democrats' power and abuse thereof - and there is ''nothing'' "mythical" about the truth regarding Dominion and its criminal actions (which, again, are well-documented despite your flimsy claims otherwise), and [[liberal denial|denying that you're making excuses for that company]] (as well as continuing to make dismissive excuses for them and brushing off the fact that you're trying to impose liberal POV on this site) does not make what you say true either.  [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 23:40, March 26, 2022 (EDT)

Revision as of 03:40, March 27, 2022

You know the Select bla bla bla committee is all going to be Merged and Redirected to Pelosi Panel, don't you? Why wast your time over there? RobSFree Kyle! 22:48, July 27, 2021 (EDT)

Sigh... If you insist. The thing is, your page doesn't even name the actual committee. Your pet name for the committee is cute and all, but I'd like to think an educational resource could at least get the basic facts correct. By the way, this committee is an on-going concern, you may want to consider using the word, 'is', instead of 'was' when describing the partisan witch hunt.--LSimons (talk) 22:56, July 27, 2021 (EDT)
Well, that's the way history will remember it. Even Joe Biden doesn't support it. It will be remembered like the Church Committee, the Tydings Committee, or the HUAC hearings. RobSFree Kyle! 03:14, July 28, 2021 (EDT)
Let's take the Benghazi hearings, for example, conducted by Trey Gowdy. The hearings themselves were part of the cover-up of Obama, John Brennan, and Hillary Clinton's transfer of captured weapon stockpiles from Benghazi to groups that became the Islamic State. Gowdy knew it. So did Pompeo who was on the committee. So did Mike Flynn, who told Trump all about it. But Gowdy only focused on killing Hillary's 2016 election chances, and not impeaching Obama who was still in office, or removing Brennan, who survived long enough to destroy Mike Flynn so Flynn couldn't do anything about it.
So, these hearings, like the Mueller investigation are part of the cover-up. As the Warren Commission and dozens of other hearings and investigations since (or actually, before). RobSFree Kyle! 03:23, July 28, 2021 (EDT)
What do you think our Ambassador was doing in Benghazi at that time, that got himself killed? He was rounding up captured MANPADS and loading them on ships and airplanes to our al Qaeda allies (Jake Sullivan's words) in Turkey preparing to invade Syria and Iraq. Only no one on the panel ever asked that question. What difference does it make? RobSFree Kyle! 03:27, July 28, 2021 (EDT)
Your alternate view of history is amazing, as is your Gish Gallop. I can’t compete with a conspiracy crazed CP admin and his minions. Have at it.--LSimons (talk) 09:09, July 28, 2021 (EDT)
Thanks. Will do. RobSFree Kyle! 10:02, July 28, 2021 (EDT)

Re: American Thinker

What Dominion Voting Systems did to protect itself by smearing those who correctly accused the company of facilitating vote fraud (with evidence to back up the accusations) and resorting to lawfare against its accusers to attempt to silence them is nothing short of unethical (at the very least) as well as an attempt to simultaneously excuse, justify and deny its criminal behavior. Making excuses for Dominion's criminal actions is tantamount to supporting said actions and, by extension, supporting crime as well, which falls right into the realm of liberal POV. Northwest (talk) 21:10, March 26, 2022 (EDT)

At least 86 judges, nominated by Democrats and Republicans, including President Donald Trump, from the lowest level state courts to the U.S. Supreme Court, rejected lawsuits filed by Trump and his supporters contesting the election result. Yet here you are brazenly insisting Dominion is exercising criminal behavior. I am not making excuses for the mythical criminal actions you are directing at Dominion. If you are correct, why didn’t Trump and his lawyers succeed at any of their lawsuits? I’d like an answer to my question. Is it alright if I post an edit to the American Thinker article that comes exclusively from their website? Or would that be ‘liberal POV’?--LSimons (talk) 23:26, March 26, 2022 (EDT)
First off, it wasn't necessary to post the same answer on both your user talk page and mine.
Second, all of those judges in question either willingly sided with the Democrats, were bought off by them or were intimidated by them into rejecting Trump's lawsuits because of one thing and one thing only - the Democrats, being the power-mad elitists and criminals they are and have been since 1828, wanted Trump out of the way because he stood in their way of consolidating absolute power and control over the American public and the elimination of the Constitution which limits the Democrats' power and abuse thereof - and there is nothing "mythical" about the truth regarding Dominion and its criminal actions (which, again, are well-documented despite your flimsy claims otherwise), and denying that you're making excuses for that company (as well as continuing to make dismissive excuses for them and brushing off the fact that you're trying to impose liberal POV on this site) does not make what you say true either. Northwest (talk) 23:40, March 26, 2022 (EDT)