Difference between revisions of "User talk:RobSmith"
Conservative (talk | contribs) |
Conservative (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
:::Does it make sense now? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 21:18, September 11, 2023 (EDT) | :::Does it make sense now? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 21:18, September 11, 2023 (EDT) | ||
| − | ::::I did make edits to the talk page. | + | ::::<big>'''Please note:'''</big> I did make edits to the talk page. |
| − | ::::And we did improve the articles via our talk page edits. I elaborated more on what "drama" is. I could have been more prompt in relation to this I admit. But I thought the term "drama" in relation to psychology and/or bad/toxic behavior is widely known and needed no explanation. But it turns out that adding the extra verbiage/quote did further clarify. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:16, September 11, 2023 (EDT) | + | ::::'''<big>An admission and accepting of some fault''':</big> And we did improve the articles via our talk page edits. I elaborated more on what "drama" is. I could have been more prompt in relation to this I admit. But I thought the term "drama" in relation to psychology and/or bad/toxic behavior is widely known and needed no explanation. But it turns out that adding the extra verbiage/quote did further clarify. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:16, September 11, 2023 (EDT) |
== Psychology articles == | == Psychology articles == | ||
Revision as of 02:20, September 12, 2023
- User talk:RobSmith/Archive 1
- User talk:RobSmith/Archive 2
- User talk:RobSmith/Archive 3
- User talk:RobSmith/Archive 4
- User talk:RobSmith/Archive 5
- User talk:RobSmith/Archive 6
- User talk:RobSmith/Archive 7
- User talk:RobSmith/Archive 8
- User talk:RobSmith/Archive 9
- User talk:RobSmith/Archive 10
- User talk:RobSmith/Archive 11
- User talk:RobSmith/Archive 12
- User talk:RobSmith/Archive 13
- User talk:RobSmith/Archive 14
I expalined my edit in terms of the lede of Dark Triad personality traits
I explained my edit in terms of the lede of Dark Triad personality traits.
I refined the definition and I also added the Britannica footnote. Conservative (talk) 20:51, September 11, 2023 (EDT)
- I thought you weren't talking to me (I have a zillion diffs of you saying so). What obligation do I have to even review your trolling edits in Mainspace since you refuse to discuss on the talk page? RobSGive Peace a Chance! 21:00, September 11, 2023 (EDT)
- You are not making any sense. Why are you against the Britannica refinement of the term Dark Triad personality traits. It agrees with the psychiatric/psychological literature.
- Edits should be reasonable. Conservative (talk) 21:06, September 11, 2023 (EDT)
- You have refused to discuss on talk; I am not obligated to waste my time reviewing your trolling edits in Mainspace. Period.
- Does it make sense now? RobSGive Peace a Chance! 21:18, September 11, 2023 (EDT)
- Please note: I did make edits to the talk page.
- Does it make sense now? RobSGive Peace a Chance! 21:18, September 11, 2023 (EDT)
- An admission and accepting of some fault: And we did improve the articles via our talk page edits. I elaborated more on what "drama" is. I could have been more prompt in relation to this I admit. But I thought the term "drama" in relation to psychology and/or bad/toxic behavior is widely known and needed no explanation. But it turns out that adding the extra verbiage/quote did further clarify. Conservative (talk) 22:16, September 11, 2023 (EDT)
Psychology articles
I sent Andy, another Conservapedian and you an email which is a copy of my recent post to Andy's talk page. Conservative (talk) 21:34, September 11, 2023 (EDT)
Re: Your recent edits to the psychology articles
The last time I pushed hard for you to be disciplined, I was successful. I prefer not to push hard again and for you to behave more reasonably and cordially.
I did push very hard for you to not be banned when Karajou was pushing very hard for it. It made a difference and you were not banned.
All I ask is that you source your material and behave cordially. That is not too much to ask for in relation to the psychology articles and other articles. Conservative (talk) 22:10, September 11, 2023 (EDT)