Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia talk:User complaints"

Revision as of 17:20, September 15, 2023

Suggestion

A user complaint page is a good idea. My only suggestion is to make up more constructive and positive. For example, call it a User feedback page instead. Taking this approach could make the content produced more constructive and avoid unconstructive bellyaching and whining. Conservative (talk) 01:11, February 27, 2023 (EST)

That's what we want, all the unconstructive bellyaching and whining, and ganging up on an individual editor on one page, rather than the routine habit of allowing it on Talk page discussions we've had for years on end now. That's why I suggested "kangaroo court" to give the appearance of having some final word without actually having authority.

As soon as an editor deviates from the topic on a Talk page discussion with personal accusations about a users conduct or ideological leanings, we cut n paste the comment and move it here, and let the trolls thrash it out. RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 01:56, February 27, 2023 (EST)

For example, let's take a certain unnamed editor whose initials begin with L and end with T, learned all sorts of bad habits of mixing the subject of a discussion with personal attacks and innuendo on other users. He learned it here in CP first, and perfected it at RW. (That unnamed editor was a babe in arms 15 years ago). And he learned it here first BECAUSE CP allowed RW trolls 15 years ago to shape CP's user conduct policies. Rather than ever address the problem with policies and a structure to handle the problem, CP just blocked editors en masse, destroyed its own user base, and never addressed the simple problem of regulating user conduct. RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 02:05, February 27, 2023 (EST)

For 15 years now, even in the Admin community, it has been impossible to even have a policy discussion, because as soon as anyone makes a proposal, his motivations and ideology are attacked (i.e., the individual user himself is attacked with accusations and innuendo) and the proposal itself never even gets discussed. This sheer lunacy needs to end, or at least be regulated somehow. RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 02:14, February 27, 2023 (EST)

This insanity of "I don't like or I oppose contributions because User:XYZ said it or did it," came from Ratrolls, and CP Admin adopted the exact same attitude, and made it law, paying no regard to the merits of contributions or proposals. You should know that yourself, the way you are treated and regarded at RW. RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 02:27, February 27, 2023 (EST)

User:VargasMilan

basically, it is User:Vargasmilan's responsibility to initiate a case here from the Community Portal. Let's remain neutral and not act as advocates for a complaining editor. RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 14:12, March 6, 2023 (EST)

Let's not get bogged down in fueling frivolous complaints. The purpose of this page is twofold: (1) To educate readers on CP Guidelines and improve editor interaction, cooperation, and conduct; (2) this is place for frivolous food fights to come and die. RobS^{Give Peace a chance}

Name change

I suggest renaming this “administrator’s notice board” instead of “user complaints” to be more in like with the site we’re supposed to be an alternative to. Quit trying to replicate a rat nest’s failed ideas, the rats gave up on the Chicken Coop for good reason. They are pathetic, and trying to replicate them is more pathetic. DMorris (talk) 10:51, September 15, 2023 (EDT)

Given recent events, how about "Third-rate, childish bellyaching/whining and bragging that Andy Schlafly ignores and User: LT mocks". Conservative (talk) 10:55, September 15, 2023 (EDT)

Or just rename it to "whine cellar" since it was RobSmith who created this page in the first place. XD —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Friday, 11:17, September 15, 2023 (EDT)

I like that. That's a good one. Conservapedia:Whine Cellar. RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 11:31, September 15, 2023 (EDT)

And if no on listens to your complaints there, you can still always go to Conservapedia:Kangaroo Court. We may eventually make it part of the Appeals process. RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 11:35, September 15, 2023 (EDT)

How about this: Aschlafly blocks all three of you under 90/10, deletes this silly page, deletes all of the “atheists are fat” pages, and Conservapedia returns to its goal of being a Wikipedia alternative for Conservatives and homeschoolers, and we promote Conservapedia to those audiences instead of using entertainment to draw numbers like the paganistic mega churches do? If numbers are all we care about, I can upload a picture of Brooke’s knockers, that will get us page views for sure (that’s sarcasm; she is beautiful but given I’ve not even seen her uncovered you can imagine I would never do that). However, those won’t be quality page views. I’m a Republican Executive Committee member and a member of an IFB church, nobody in either circle have even heard of Conservapedia. DMorris (talk) 12:12, September 15, 2023 (EDT)

Who's going to contribute anything significant to the mainspace with all of us three blocked? You? —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Friday, 12:25, September 15, 2023 (EDT)

Maybe, because maybe then people would take the site seriously again. Nothing personal against you LT, but Rob trying to imitate the rat nest combined with all of these quantity over quality pages (especially the ones in which Conservative engages the rat nest; I’ve done my share of trolling the rat nest, though not as much as I get accused of, yet I never spill the drama to Conservapedia or Wikipedia except to purge the sites of that garbage because it’s off-mission and unprofessional) are making this site into a circus. I have better things to do than contribute to a site that no one takes seriously. DMorris (talk) 13:04, September 15, 2023 (EDT)

This page exists to keep all the whining and crying off Andy talk. If you wanna b*tch about another editor, this is the place to do it. RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 13:09, September 15, 2023 (EDT)

Yeah, just like the chicken coop at the rat nest, which they pretty much quit using because it was nothing but drama. Really email to Andy is the way to deal with it, not a bunch of unprofessional bickering on the open internet. Have you not heard of praising in public while correcting in private? Seriously Rob, I lost respect for you when it became apparent that you propose every bad idea that the worthless, piece of garbage rat nest gave up on (remember when you suggested we copy the vandal bin that they no longer use and tolerate trolls which turned into a zoo over there?) Oh, and allowing VPNs so that the trolls can hop all over the world and laugh at us is stupid. Why not propose we copy something useful, like the edit filter?DMorris (talk) 13:20, September 15, 2023 (EDT)