Difference between revisions of "Liberal logic"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(added another "see also")
m (I think this is what you meant)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
* increasing spending by government must reduce poverty (no, dependency increases poverty)
 
* increasing spending by government must reduce poverty (no, dependency increases poverty)
 
* teaching abstinence-only does not reduce premarital sex
 
* teaching abstinence-only does not reduce premarital sex
−
* widespread ownership of the largely defensive weapon of gun must not reduce crime
+
* widespread ownership of guns, largely defensive weapons, must not reduce crime
 
* that new laws reducing the gun ownership rate by 0.1% and a subsequent election of a left wing government are not linked
 
* that new laws reducing the gun ownership rate by 0.1% and a subsequent election of a left wing government are not linked
 
* that lack of government programs to rehabilitate criminals must not reduce crime
 
* that lack of government programs to rehabilitate criminals must not reduce crime

Revision as of 02:49, February 16, 2008

Liberal logic is an argument that has logical appeal to a liberal, but is nonsensical. Let's build a list:

  • free speech for anything and everything ... except the conservative truth
  • an atheistic culture cannot harm anyone, but saying a prayer in class can cause tremendous harm
  • increasing spending by government must reduce poverty (no, dependency increases poverty)
  • teaching abstinence-only does not reduce premarital sex
  • widespread ownership of guns, largely defensive weapons, must not reduce crime
  • that new laws reducing the gun ownership rate by 0.1% and a subsequent election of a left wing government are not linked
  • that lack of government programs to rehabilitate criminals must not reduce crime
  • that increasing taxes must increase government revenue (no, often people work less)

(add to list)

See also