| | On July 8, 2009, Jim Cramer on ''Mad Money'' again graded the performance of Obama's administration and economic policies against the performance of the stock market. He commented, "The same force that so hurt the markets this [[winter]] has yet again reared its ugly head: the [[White House|White House’s]] anti-business rhetoric. [...] Investors don’t seem to trust President Obama to create jobs and stimulate the economy, not when he prioritizes [[global warming|climate change]] and [[ObamaCare|health care]]." Moreover, the ''Mad Money Obama Accountability Index'' score had dropped to 96.1 from its starting point of 100.<ref>[http://www.cnbc.com/id/31802202/site/14081545 Cramer: Obama Hurting the Economy], CNBC, July 8, 2009.</ref> He urged Obama to postpone his agenda in favor of boosting the economy. "Without more job creation," Cramer said, "the president’s agenda and his tone will continue to slowly and inexorably squeeze the life out of this stock market."<ref>Rush Limbaugh. [http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_031009/content/01125108.guest.html The Founders Wanted Presidents to Fail If They Deserved To Fail], RushLimbaugh.com, March 10, 2009.</ref> | | On July 8, 2009, Jim Cramer on ''Mad Money'' again graded the performance of Obama's administration and economic policies against the performance of the stock market. He commented, "The same force that so hurt the markets this [[winter]] has yet again reared its ugly head: the [[White House|White House’s]] anti-business rhetoric. [...] Investors don’t seem to trust President Obama to create jobs and stimulate the economy, not when he prioritizes [[global warming|climate change]] and [[ObamaCare|health care]]." Moreover, the ''Mad Money Obama Accountability Index'' score had dropped to 96.1 from its starting point of 100.<ref>[http://www.cnbc.com/id/31802202/site/14081545 Cramer: Obama Hurting the Economy], CNBC, July 8, 2009.</ref> He urged Obama to postpone his agenda in favor of boosting the economy. "Without more job creation," Cramer said, "the president’s agenda and his tone will continue to slowly and inexorably squeeze the life out of this stock market."<ref>Rush Limbaugh. [http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_031009/content/01125108.guest.html The Founders Wanted Presidents to Fail If They Deserved To Fail], RushLimbaugh.com, March 10, 2009.</ref> |
| − | * The Obama Accountability Index on November 10, 2009, reached 158 compared to the base of 100, an 18% increase over the S&P 500 during the same period. | + | * The Obama Accountability Index (OAI) on November 10, 2009, reached 158 compared to the base of 100, an 18% gain over the S&P 500 during the same period. |
| − | * The Obama Accountability Index on February 10, 2010, reached 141.65 compared to the base of 100, a 14.45% increase over the S&P 500 during the same period. Thus, according to the OAI, Obama is doing well. | + | * The OAI on February 10, 2010, reached 141.65 compared to the base of 100; this is a 14.45% gain over the S&P 500 during the same period. |
| − | Cramer has not mentioned it on [[Mad Money]] since July, 2009.<ref name=personal>Personal voucher by [[User:DerekE|DerekE]] and [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]], both users have recalculated the OAI to update its accountability status. <http://conservapedia.com/Talk:Jim_Cramer>, see: [[Talk:Jim_Cramer]]</ref> | + | * The OAI on August 22, 2011, reached 160.93 compared to the adjusted base<ref>Personal voucher by [[User:DerekE|DerekE]]. This user has calculated the OAI to update is accountability status (recalculated on September 06, 2011). |
| | + | Cramer has not mentioned the Obama Accountability Index on [[Mad Money]] since July, 2009.<ref name=personal>Personal voucher by [[User:DerekE|DerekE]] and [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]], both users have recalculated the OAI to update its accountability status. <http://conservapedia.com/Talk:Jim_Cramer>, see: [[Talk:Jim_Cramer]]</ref> |