Talk:Essay: Communist China’s quixotic quest to innovate: A statist economy can’t make creativity greatly blossom
Apparently, American foreign policy is run by a bunch of Luddites:
| “ | any Chinese company innovating too quickly or succeeding too visibly now represents a “risk” in the eyes of the US government | ” |
How come you are always a day late and $10 inflation adjusted dollars short?
You know, if America is ever to raise up a generation of young innovators to compete with the Chinese and Russians, they need to be smarter than the author of these essays and able to read through all the false pride and cheerleading. RobSThe Truth. Just Putin It Out There 23:53, January 24, 2025 (EST)
As Trump said, it's a merit-based society, and not one based on birthright (cause you were lucky enough to be born American, and not Russian or Chinese).
But this seems to a habit with this author - trying to promote himself or his society by tearing others down. RobSThe Truth. Just Putin It Out There 23:59, January 24, 2025 (EST)
Do you ever actually do any research for the pap you pollute Conservapedia pages and Categories with?
User:Conservative: You could save both of us countless hours daily if you were to cease your trolling. Most importantly, it would be beneficial to our readers. RobSThe Truth. Just Putin It Out There 16:44, January 27, 2025 (EST)
- "According to a McKinsey report, AI could potentially contribute around $600 billion annually to the Chinese economy, which could equate to roughly 3.7% of China's current GDP". - McKinsey & Company, 2022[1]
- What about the rest of the economy? In 2023, the USA was over 200% more productive in terms of labor productivity than China when measured using purchasing power parity.[2]
- And labor productivity leads to economic stability and wealth generation. Right now China has a property crisis, deflation and high youth unemployment. China's economy is a mess so it's not surprising that the USA has over 300% higher GDP (PPP) than China per capita in 2024.[3]
- After all is said and done, statist picking and choosing of winners and losers is not as innovative, dynamic, prosperity creating or stable as capitalism overall - especially over the long run.[4]
- For a while, the Soviet Union and Japan were high flyers, but their economic castles were built on sand. China's deflation shows that it is at the beginning stage of Japanification which is a type of economic stagnation.[5]Conservative (talk) 18:11, January 27, 2025 (EST)
None of your lame postings and excuses will coverup the fact that (A) you don't know what you are talking about (B) your only motivation is maliciousness and vindictiveness toward another editor, and (C) you are wasting colossal amounts of yours, Andy's, mine, and everybody else's time. And ultimately, all your crap and trolling will be burnt up and deleted. RobSThe Truth. Just Putin It Out There 22:19, January 27, 2025 (EST)
<c>China surpasses US in scientist numbers for the first time]]]</c> <c>China surpasses the US in top scientists, with its global share rising to 28% by 2024. [6]</c> <c>January 17, 2024</c>
| “ | According to statistics, from 2020 to 2024, the number of leading scientists in China increased from 18,805 to 32,511, with its global share rising from 16.9 percent to 27.9 percent. This indicates a significant shift in global talent dynamics. None of this is coincidental. Some foreign media outlets said that today's China is no longer just the "world's factory" or "a giant market for the world's companies;" it is increasingly becoming the "world's research-and-development laboratory." | ” |
Why are you forcing me to headline this stuff on MPR? It is the only way to give readers fair warning that some of the crap they find on this website is crap.