Talk:Emmanuel Macron

Macron and Islamic terrorism

In a speech to French ambassadors, Macron said that "the fight against Islamic terrorism is the first priority of French diplomacy."[1] It seems that Macron is shifting closer to Trump in regards to Islamic terrorism -- maybe I'm wrong, but the term "Islamic terrorism" is definitely not popular among liberals. --1990'sguy (talk) 23:56, 29 August 2017 (EDT)

Labor reform

Something that might be interesting to include here is Macron's labor reform proposals, and whether they go into effect: [2] I would have preferred Fillon to have been elected president, as he is a Thatcherite and Macron once was a member of the Socialist Party (and he supports the socialist/globalist EU), but it will be interesting to see what happens. --1990'sguy (talk) 18:45, 31 August 2017 (EDT)

Here is another interesting article on Macron's proposed reforms: [3] --1990'sguy (talk) 11:33, 5 September 2017 (EDT)

Article "parking spot"

Macron's spokesman referred to nationalism as "leprosy," something I probably won't add because it didn't come from Macron himself, but this is still worth noting here: [4] --1990'sguy (talk) 08:59, 14 February 2019 (EST)

It's the same as Macron saying it himself; "A Macron spokesman said...." If the aide isn't fired quickly, Macron stands by the statement. RobS^{Deep Six the Deep State!} 15:20, 14 February 2019 (EST)

Macron is changing his tone on immigration, apparently realizing that his open borders stance isn't helping him politically: 1,2,3 --1990'sguy (talk) 22:36, 2 October 2019 (EDT)

That's happening in several EU countries, leftists rushing to the head of the parade to avoid going down with the ship. When the issue goes to the back burner again, remember a leopard can't change his spots. RobS^{De Plorabus Unum} 23:19, 2 October 2019 (EDT)

Now, France says it will implement quotas for migrant workers (though they will only be decided next year): 1,2,3 --1990'sguy (talk) 12:19, 5 November 2019 (EST)

Yellow vest is at or near its first anniversary. We should do a recap of the first year on that page. It's hard to keep up on a weekly basis. RobS^{De Plorabus Unum} 08:58, 7 November 2019 (EST)

Seems like a good idea to me. --1990'sguy (talk) 23:07, 10 November 2019 (EST)

Franch police removed 1,600 migrants from camps in Paris: [5] --1990'sguy (talk) 23:07, 10 November 2019 (EST)

Here's an interesting article on the current state of French conservatism under Macron's presidency: [6] --1990'sguy (talk) 11:26, 5 December 2019 (EST)

Macron's wife is a possible transexual? Why is this in the article?

In the "biography section" at: https://www.conservapedia.com/Emmanuel_Macron#Biography , the Emmanuel Macron article goes into some nonsensical allegation that Macron's wife is a transexual.

The fact is that Donald Trump, who used to own a beauty pageant, is married and well-known for his various relationships with women, famously commented on Macron's wife's figure (see: Trump praises Macron's wife's 'good shape'- BBC News).

Conservapedia should say "au revoir" to the Macron's wife is a potential transexual tripe. It smacks of demonization because it is so evidentially flimsy, desperate and hyper-partisan. Conservative (talk) 17:49, March 16, 2024 (EDT)

I dunno, maybe cause Macron just denied it yesterday, as reported in conservative media in the United States. It's been in this article for sometime. It's headlines in France] [7] (look at the date). Go troll somewhere else about Elevatorgate or some other gay crap nobody's interested in (except you), or gossip some more about Putin and Russia. Wait wait wait, maybe people are interested in a 2,400 calorie burger Michelle Obama ate. or Trent Toulouse's French Fries. RobS^{Zelensky didn't kill himself} 18:19, March 16, 2024 (EDT)

While I understand the concern many homosexuals have about Gay bowel syndrome, you are the only conservative I ever met (and I know lots of them) who had any interest in the subject. In fact, I have repeatedly, for 17 years, tried to raise or discuss the subject with conservatives, and haven't found one interested yet. In fact, for the most part, they find me trying to discuss it with them offensive.

And I even helped you on that article, having no idea what you were going to do with it. I was led to believe it was for educational purposes. But when it became clear your purpose and intent was mockery, I regret that collaboration with you. You deceived me. RobS^{Zelensky didn't kill himself} 18:29, March 16, 2024 (EDT)}}

NASA probably has denied the man on the moon landing was a fraud allegation, but that doesn't mean we highlight it in the 2nd section of the Apollo 11 Conservapedia article. Oh well, some people double down on their craziness because they loathe admitting that they are wrong about matters. This is an example of something that has undue weight as far as it being near the top half of the article or even the top 90% of the article.

Unfortunately, I don't expect the Emmanuel Macron to hit the 1,000,000 a page view benchmark. It's not even close the 100,000 page view benchmark. The leading section is terrible because it doesn't follow the principle of an article building a case and having a reasonable tone and statements so people don't bail from the article early. For example, the Macron article engages in hyper-partisan language that is not even accurate in places (Macron is fascist, etc. France was taken over by fascist Germany in WWII and now they have a fascist president?). What this does is prevent the people who are persuadable from diving deeper into the article. So you are merely preaching to the choir which is a pretty lame and pointless exercise. I would suggest dumping your frequent all-or-nothing thinking which makes it more likely that you engage in demonization. So many of your articles have hyper-partisan, poor lede paragraphs/sections which prevent persuadable readers from digging into the articles. Conservative (talk) 18:49, March 16, 2024 (EDT)