Talk:Gay bashing

From Conservapedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Conservative (talk | contribs) at 18:44, June 12, 2024. It may differ significantly from current revision.
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The term "gay bashing", in the real world, refers to physical violence against gay people, but this article is mostly about violence committed by gay people. I guess you can redefine terms as you see fit, but that doesn't make this site very "trustworthy," at least for people who live in the real world. FredJ (talk) 00:53, 23 September 2018 (EDT)

Wikipedia defines gay bashing as "Gay bashing and gay bullying is verbal or physical abuse against a person who is perceived by the aggressor to be gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender, including persons who are actually heterosexual."
It is not Conservapedia's fault that most gay bashing is done by homosexuals.Conservative (talk) 03:50, 23 September 2018 (EDT)

]

Where did you find that statistic? (And isn't Wikipedia supposed to be unreliable?) FredJ (talk) 08:46, 23 September 2018 (EDT)
You presumably know that the internet is a big place, and one can find statements in support of just about any viewpoint, however outlandish or nonsensical-by-the-standards-of-normal-sensible-people they may be. If one spends huge amounts of time scouring the internet for wacky statements, one will find them.
"Seek, and ye shall find" -- Matthew 7:7. (Am I saying the internet is like God? No.)
There are a few people at Conservapedia who frequently do this, User:Conservative ("Cons") perhaps foremost among them. I still occasionally find treasure troves of this sort of thing, like this thing about someone named "cultofdusty", who posted some silly thing on youtube about how atheists own the internet. If a normal person came across such tripe they would simply move on, after promising themselves not to spend so much time clicking on asinine youtube videos.
On another topic, please be aware that posting {{fact}} tags at Conservapedia almost never ends well. Countering misinformation is not easy. Choose your battles carefully.
SamHB (talk) 13:58, 23 September 2018 (EDT)


Why liberal and leftist snowflakes don't like my articles on gay bashing, gay bowel syndrome and obesity

Please see: [[Essay: Why liberal and leftist snowflakes don't like my articles on gay bashing, gay bowel syndrome and obesity]]. Conservative (talk) 21:37, June 9, 2024 (EDT)

Maybe you're just a sick person with a sick mind, and criticism of these alleged "works" isn't limited to "liberal snowflakes". Your thinking so is just another example of you splitting (psychology) thinking. RobSThe Truth. Just Putin It Out There 21:49, June 9, 2024 (EDT)

Russia and China

This text and citations have been excised and placed here pending review.

This article is about violence against homosexuals, and the Russian citations do not address that phenomenon. The Russian cites are about anti--gay propaganda laws aimed to protect children. I'm not sure what the liberal/leftist/commie Bloomberg News cite says, so it needs to be reviewed. Given Bloombergs commercial dependence on the CCP, it's doubtful it has anything of relevance for this particular article, but it needs to be reviewed anyway. RobSThe Truth. Just Putin It Out There 13:19, June 10, 2024 (EDT)

refs