Talk:Arab Spring

From Conservapedia
This is the current revision of Talk:Arab Spring as edited by RobSmith (Talk | contribs) at 17:28, May 22, 2026. This URL is a permanent link to this version of this page.

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Intifada Palestine?

"Intifada Palestine" is a Leftist website, that supports Terrorism. What does this make at a Conservative encyclopedia?--JoeyJ 11:40, 27 January 2014 (EST)

NPOV? RobSThe coup plotters won, for now 17:41, 29 April 2017 (EDT)

Arab Spring: pro-Zionist or anti-Zionist?

Neocon fundamentally is a codeword for Zionist. The Arab Spring was either pro-Zionist or anti-Zionist. It either served the neocon agenda or opposed it. While it aligned itself with the neocon theories of democratitization, it elected the anti-democratic Muslim Brotherhood in the most populous Middle Eastern Arab Muslim state of Egypt. Hence, I would surmmize we should stop referring to the Arab Spring as part of the neocon agenda. Globalist? Yes. Soros backed? Yes. Neocon? No. The neocons and Zionists have no bigger enemy than George Soros. RobSThe coup plotters won, for now 15:06, 29 April 2017 (EDT)

Red text

Could we please stick with black colored text and not use red? Thanks, JDano (talk) 08:37, 9 June 2017 (EDT)

I'm converting it all to prose narrative. I'll be removed as I write. I just need it for the time being to separate Libya & Syria issues, which have a bit of overlapping text. I need to avoid redundancy. This isn't the finished work yet. RobSDeep Six the Deep State! 14:17, 9 June 2017 (EDT)

User:Conservative proven wrong, AGAIN

User:Conservative has misrepresented the views of Rear Admiral James Stavridis is his more than 4 dozen warmongering troll screeds.

  • On March 2, 2025 the London Telegraph reported former Supreme Allied Commander US Navy Four Star Admiral James Stavridis said that since the Trump administration made it clear that aid to Kyiv could become a "geopolitical miscalculation of colossal proportions....We may be witnessing the last days of NATO".[1]
  • Whenever a rising power (in this case China) confronts an established power (the U.S.) over the past two thousand years, the outcome very often leads to a global conflict. This occurs despite the fact that in most cases there is no advantage to either side in launching into a war.[2]