Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia:Featured articles"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(→‎Proposed for featuring)
Line 96: Line 96:
 
**Disagree. Many better American topics than this. [[User:TonyT|TonyT]] 12:40, 16 June 2008 (EDT)
 
**Disagree. Many better American topics than this. [[User:TonyT|TonyT]] 12:40, 16 June 2008 (EDT)
 
**Agree. It's something different (think of it as chess on steroids), but I'm biased --[[User:JessicaT|JessicaT]]<sub>[[User talk:JessicaT|''Ohayo gozaimasu!'']]</sub> 16:23, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
 
**Agree. It's something different (think of it as chess on steroids), but I'm biased --[[User:JessicaT|JessicaT]]<sub>[[User talk:JessicaT|''Ohayo gozaimasu!'']]</sub> 16:23, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
 +
**Agree. Found this very interesting and informative. I think others would too. [[User:Taj|Taj]] 14:46, 22 July 2008 (EDT)
 
*[[Sausage]]
 
*[[Sausage]]
 
**Disagree. Too short. Too many red links. [[User:TonyT|TonyT]] 12:40, 16 June 2008 (EDT)
 
**Disagree. Too short. Too many red links. [[User:TonyT|TonyT]] 12:40, 16 June 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 18:46, July 22, 2008

Featured articles

Committee members

The Featured articles are posted on the Main Page each week. Articles may be submitted to the list of featured articles by listing them on this page. Please add them to the end of the list. Articles will normally be featured in the order listed, but the order may be changed by the committee in some cases.

Articles listed here will be considered for featuring by the committee. However, any editor may offer their own comments and are welcome to help improved listed articles.

Past articles

2007/08

Current article

Future articles

The following articles should be checked for any improvements that can be made before they are posted to the Main Page.

Proposed for featuring

The following articles will probably be moved to the list above in the order listed if nobody has any objection or alternative suggestion.

New suggestions can be added at the end of this list.

  • Deconstruction
    • Disagree. Unimportant topic of interest mostly to liberals. TonyT 12:40, 16 June 2008 (EDT)
    • Disagree. Important topic, but not described correctly. Article contains at least one contradiction ("reader response" both wrong and right). --Ed Poor Talk 16:40, 2 July 2008 (EDT)