Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Communism"
From Conservapedia
(→Cold War I link: new section) |
(→Cold War I link) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
There's a link to [[Cold War I]] in this nav template, but it redirects to [[Cold War]]. Can an administrator change the link to [[Cold War]]? Thank you [[User:Patriotic Gamer|Patriotic Gamer]] ([[User talk:Patriotic Gamer|talk]]) 23:48, June 21, 2021 (EDT) | There's a link to [[Cold War I]] in this nav template, but it redirects to [[Cold War]]. Can an administrator change the link to [[Cold War]]? Thank you [[User:Patriotic Gamer|Patriotic Gamer]] ([[User talk:Patriotic Gamer|talk]]) 23:48, June 21, 2021 (EDT) | ||
| + | :I think you're right, but [[Cold War II]] is a developing situation. As of now, it appears Russia is on NATO's side. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 01:21, June 22, 2021 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 05:21, June 22, 2021
Too many red links in a template ... unless planning to fill in those entries soon. Thanks.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 00:14, 12 April 2020 (EDT)
- I agree. We need to focus on the danger of Communism today. While its historical context is helpful, it needn't be dominant. We could fill a whole page with persons and organizations in its historical context. RobSDe Plorabus Unum 01:41, 12 April 2020 (EDT)
- Fair enough, I could create a couple of those articles and re-add them to the template when needed. Northwest (talk) 02:48, 12 April 2020 (EDT)
- I'd like to see concentration on documenting a solid basis for adding people such as AOC, etc.. to the Template, not using innuendo or making it all about defunct and historic subjects. And that begins with putting the solid evidence within linked mainspace. RobSDe Plorabus Unum 12:00, 12 April 2020 (EDT)
- Fair enough, I could create a couple of those articles and re-add them to the template when needed. Northwest (talk) 02:48, 12 April 2020 (EDT)
Cold War I link
There's a link to Cold War I in this nav template, but it redirects to Cold War. Can an administrator change the link to Cold War? Thank you Patriotic Gamer (talk) 23:48, June 21, 2021 (EDT)
- I think you're right, but Cold War II is a developing situation. As of now, it appears Russia is on NATO's side. RobSFree Kyle! 01:21, June 22, 2021 (EDT)
