Conscription

Conscription or the draft is compulsory military service in a country. In the United States it is conducted by the Selective Service System.

21st century

Today several countries employ conscription in order to keep their military filled including Ukraine, Israel, South Korea, Taiwan, Russia and Switzerland. The United States has employed conscription, known as "the draft" during times of war, though not since the Vietnam War. In the United States during the Vietnam era, the draft was performed by lottery. All American males must register for the draft when they reach eighteen years of age.

Ukraine mobilization

Ukraine military draft law.

Director of the Foreign Intelligence Service of the Russian Federation Sergey Naryshkin said that the West demands that the Zelensky regime, regardless of losses, demonstrate to the world community the impossibility of Russia's victory in the Ukrainian conflict. In particular, the United States directed the Ukrainian leadership to maximize mobilization to make up for the huge losses suffered by the Armed Forces of Ukraine (AFU) during the failed 2023 summer counteroffensive. Kiev's American and British curators recommended that the Ukraine lower the age of conscription to 17 years and raise it to 70 years, as well as the mobilization of women.

Following such guidelines, the Minister of Defense of Ukraine Rustem Umerov proposed to the Verkhovna Rada to study the possibility of lowering the minimum age for conscription into the army. When this happens, the SVR report says, the Kiev regime will confirm its Nazi essence by sending seventeen-year-old boys into the heat of war to prolong the agony of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. This is reminiscent of the actions of the leadership of fascist Germany in the creation of the Nazi people's militia "Volkssturm" in the autumn of 1944, within the framework of which "Hitler Youth" units were formed from children.

Colossal losses among Ukrainian servicemen caused the Kiev regime to send "old men" into battle. The Armed Forces of Ukraine formed new units of fighters over 40 years old and began mobilizing men over 50 years old. The new law, raised the conscription age for privates from 60 to 65 years, and for command personnel from 65 to 70 years. Throughout 2023, the average age of a Ukrainian soldier fighting at the front was 43 years old.

An acute shortage of human resources at the front caused the Zelensky regime to increase the number of women in the ranks of the Ukrainian army, which, according to Western estimates, already numbered more than 40,000. The Kiev regime raised the age limit for recruiting women for military service to 60 years. But this is not enough for Kyiv. The Ukrainian military command ask the parliament to expand the list of women's professions subject to mobilization. Since October of 2023, medical workers were subject to it. As a result, the problem of staff shortages in hospitals, clinics and pharmacies sharply worsened. But the current Kiev regime was not interested in this, and it is ready to continue the war "to the last Ukrainian" in the name of Western interests.

The Financial Times reported in January 2024 that Ukraine army chiefs requested "to mobilize about 400,000 to 500,000 new soldiers to replace those killed or wounded." Budanov said "it is not even conceivable to think that we can do without mobilization".

Ukrainian psycho Reichsführer Kyrylo Budanov was reported to have commented publicly about the ineffectiveness of mobilization, the draft, kidnappings, press gangs, and the low state of morale under the Zelensky regime:

"We don’t have so many people willing to do anything. I’m not even talking about fighting, but this is current. There will be losses and this number must be maintained constantly,” added the head of the Main Intelligence Directorate. Now the effectiveness of forcibly mobilized Ukrainians is almost zero. This was stated by the head of the Main Intelligence Directorate Budanov. “Everyone who wanted to came in the first six months. Who is being called up now? Unfortunately, there will not be a good answer here. If you don’t find motivation for these people, then how many people are not forced or according to the law, then their efficiency will be almost zero. What in principle, this is what has been happening lately,” Budanov said. He believes that financial benefits for those mobilized are no longer in first place. “Most of our people, although everyone shouts “I am Ukrainian, Ukraine is above all,” have not felt themselves to be citizens of Ukraine. They do not have the feeling that the enemy has captured the territory and this is my sacred duty to defend this country. Everyone is rooting for Ukraine , but everyone is running,” added the head of the Main Intelligence Directorate.

(back of head) Psychotic warmonger Lindsey Graham; (across table left and right) Yermak and Zelensky.
"The best money we ever spent."

In a video released by the Zelensky regime US Sen. Lindsey Graham is heard saying, "Russians are dying, it's the best money we ever spent." Graham was pleased with Ukrainian's willingness to "fight to the last person" as U.S. proxies. At least 73,000 Ukrainian soldiers were killed in the ill-planned, unprepared, ill-trained, ill-timed, ill-equipped and ultimately ill-fated disaster that was the 2023 counteroffensive - a plan which Graham called "impressive." Ukraine actually lost more territory while Russia gained more. Graham later explained on CBS Face the Nation why he was such an ardent warmonger and excited about exterminating the adult male population of Ukraine.

In an interview with New Voice radio on January 8, 2024 Chairman of the Rada Committee on National Security, Defense and Intelligence Roman Kostenko said Zelensky is a "political corpse". Kostenko, who is also an SBU colonel, said Ukrainian dictator Volodymyr Zelensky had withdrawn from negotiations on a new, controversial draft mobilization bill by trying to pass blame for the unpopular legislation unto others. Kostenko said Zelensky is more concerned about his approval ratings than preserving the state. Should another presidential election ever be held, Zelensky would not be re-elected. By spring 2024 Zelenksy was facing a "Mussolini moment" where his own people would hang him by his feet.

United States

Conscription was a factor in American wars since the colonial era. There was a peacetime draft in 1940-41, and 1948-1973. Since 1973 the draft has been suspended, but not abolished, and men are required to register. There has never been a draft of women. In 1945 President Franklin D. Roosevelt asked Congress to draft women nurses, but that was not done.

In June 2024 the United States House of Representatives passed a bill requiring conscription of men, and the United States Senate passed a bill requiring the conscription of both men and women

Conscription in the United States

Colonial and Early National

Colonial militia laws—and after independence those of the United States and the various states—required able-bodied males to enroll in the militia, to undergo a minimum of military training, and to serve for limited periods of time in war or emergency. This earliest form of conscription involved selective drafts of militiamen for service in particular campaigns. Following this system in its essentials, the Continental Congress in 1778 recommended that the states draft men from their militias for one year's service in the Continental army; this first national conscription was irregularly applied and failed to fill the Continental ranks during the American Revolution. In 1814, President James Madison proposed conscription of 40,000 men for the army, but the War of 1812 ended before Congress took any action.

Civil War

Although both North and South resorted to conscription during the American Civil War, in neither nation did the system work effectively. The Confederate congress on Apr. 16, 1862, passed an act requiring military service for three years from all males aged eighteen to thirty-five not legally exempt, and it later extended the obligation. The U.S. Congress followed on July 17, 1862, with an act authorizing a militia draft within a state when it could not meet its quota with volunteers. This state-administered system failed in practice and on Mar. 3, 1863, Congress passed the first genuine national conscription law, setting up under the Union army an elaborate machinery for enrolling and drafting men between twenty and forty-five years of age. Quotas were assigned in each state, the deficiencies in volunteers to be met by conscription. But men drafted could provide substitutes or, until mid-1864, avoid service by paying commutation money. Many eligibles pooled their money to cover the cost of anyone drafted. Families used the substitute provision to select which man should go into the army and which should stay home. There was much evasion and overt resistance to the draft, especially in Catholic areas. The great draft riot in New York City in July 1863 involved Irish men who had been signed up as citizens to swell the machine vote, not realizing it made them liable for the draft. Of the 168,649 men procured for the Union through the draft, 117,986 were substitutes, leaving only 50,663 who had their personal services conscripted.

The problem of Confederate desertion was aggravated by the inequitable inclinations of conscription officers and local judges. The three conscription acts of the Confederacy exempted certain categories, most notably the planter class, and enrolling officers and local judges often practiced favoritism, sometimes accepting bribes. Attempts to effectively deal with the issue were frustrated by conflict between state and local governments on the one hand and the national government of the Confederacy.

World War I

In 1917 the administration of Woodrow Wilson decided to rely primarily on conscription, rather than voluntary enlistment, to raise military manpower for World War I. An important motivation was to head off ex-president Theodore Roosevelt who proposed to raise volunteer division, which would upstage Wilson. The Selective Service Act of May 18, 1917, was carefully drawn to remedy the defects in the Civil War system and—by allowing exemptions for dependency, essential occupations, and religious scruples—to place each man in his proper niche in a national war effort. The act established a "liability for military service of all male citizens"; authorized a selective draft of all those between twenty-one and thirty-one years of age (later from eighteen to forty-five); and prohibited all forms of bounties, substitutions, or purchase of exemptions. Administration was entrusted to local boards composed of leading civilians in each community. These boards issued draft calls in order of numbers drawn in a national lottery and determined exemptions. In 1917 and 1918 some 24 million men were registered and nearly 3 million inducted into the military services, with little of the resistance that characterized the Civil War.

The draft was universalistic and included blacks on the same tewrms as whites (although they served in different units). In all 367,710 blacks were drafted (13.0% of the total). compared to 2,442,586 whites (86.9%). Keith (2000) discusses the reasons behind Southern farmers' resistance to the draft. Along with a general opposition to American involvement in a foreign conflict, Southern farmers objected to unfair conscription practices that exempted members of the upper class and industrial workers. Draft boards were localized and based their decisions on social class: the poorest were the most often conscripted because they were considered the most expendable at home. African Americans in particular were often disproportionately drafted, though they generally were conscripted as laborers and not sent into combat to avoid the tensions that would arise from mixing races in military units. Forms of resistance ranged from peaceful protest to violent demonstrations and from humble letterwriting campaigns asking for mercy to radical newspapers demanding reform. The most common tactics were dodging and desertion, and many communities sheltered and defended their draft dodgers as political heroes.

Ford (1997) shows that nearly half a million immigrants were drafted, forcing the military to develop training procedures that took ethnic differences into account. Military leaders invited Progressive reformers and ethnic group leaders to assist in formulating new military policies. The military attempted to socialize and Americanize young immigrant recruits, not by forcing "angloconformity," but by showing remarkable sensitivity and respect for ethnic values and traditions and a concern for the morale of immigrant troops. Sports activities, keeping immigrant groups together, newspapers in various languages, the assistance of bilingual officers, and ethnic entertainment programs were all employed.

World War II

The World War I system served as a model for that of World War II. The Selective Service and Training Act of Sept. 14, 1940, instituted national conscription in peacetime, requiring registration of all men between twenty-one and forty-five, with selection for one year's service by a national lottery. The term of service was extended by one year in August 1941. After Pearl Harbor the Selective Service Act was further amended (Dec. 19, 1941), extending the term of service to the duration of the war and six months and requiring the registration of all men eighteen to sixty-four years of age. In the massive draft of World War II, 50 million men from eighteen to forty-five were registered, 36 million classified, and 10 million inducted.

Cold War

The World War II draft expired in March 1947, but conscription was revived in 1948 and for more than two decades of intermittent peace and limited war became an established American institution.

For its manpower needs, because of low pay scales the military relied on a combination of volunteers for the Navy, Marines and Air Force, and the draft plus volunteers for the Army. Every year from 1950 to 1970 the Selective Service system drafted from 100,000 to 300,000 18-year-old men for 24 months of active duty in the Army. The peaks came during the Korean War (525,000 drafted in 1951) and the Vietnam War (382,000 drafted in 1966). In all Selective Service drafted about 25% of all young men for two-year tours; an even larger number volunteered for three years in the Navy or Air Force, where conditions were better. After active duty, the servicemen were required to join reserve units. Many were not drafted because they did not meet high physical standards, or were fathers or college students. The chances of getting drafted varied dramatically from year to year and place to place in unpredictable fashion. The system not only provided soldiers at low cost, it gave the nation millions of veterans with highly useful technical and organizational skills, along with financial benefits for mortgages, health care and college education.

The Universal Military Training and Service Act of 1951 theoretically placed a military obligation on all men between the ages of eighteen and a half and twenty-six for a total of eight years of combined active and reserve military duty. The act was extended and variously amended at four-year intervals—in 1955, 1959, 1963, and 1967—and provided options of various types of reserve service for the basic two years of active duty required of those conscripted. In actual practice only enough draftees were called each year to fill military ranks (primarily the Army, with pvccasional use for the Marine Corps) to their allotted strengths when not enough men volunteered, and thus, many physically fit youths escaped service altogether.

Various deferments for educational and other reasons were provided for, as well as exemptions that were subject to some abuse. Opposition to operations of the Selective Service System was a central feature of the movement against the Vietnam War. With Congress and the public increasingly critical, the draft law was renewed for only two years in 1971. Meanwhile, President Richard M. Nixon in 1969 restored the system of selection by lottery. At the end of the Vietnam War in January 1973, Nixon suspended the draft entirely and reverted to the all-volunteer forces of pre-1940 America.

Current status

The draft is suspended, but men (not women) must register at age 18. It can be reinstated at any time, as has been suggested by Congressman Charles Rangel and others.

See also

• Selective Service System

Bibliography

• Jack F. Leach, Conscription in the United States: Historical Background. (Rutland, Vt., 1952)

American Revolution

• Dougherty, Keith L. Collective Action under the Articles of Confederation. Cambridge U. Press, 2001. 211 pp.

Civil War

• Bernstein, Iver. The New York City Draft Riots: Their Significance for American Society and Politics in the Age of the Civil War (1990). online edition
• Cruz,Barbara C. and Jennifer Marques Patterson. "'In the Midst of Strange and Terrible Times': The New York City Draft Riots of 1863. Social Education. v. 69#1 2005. pp 10+, with teacher's guide and URL's. online version
• Geary, James W. We Need Men: The Union Draft in the Civil War (1991) 264pp
• Geary, James W. "Civil War Conscription in the North: A Historiographical Review," Civil War History 32 (1986): 208-28,
• Hilderman, Walter C., III. They Went into the Fight Cheering! Confederate Conscription in North Carolina. Boone, N.C.: Parkway, 2005. 272 pp.
• Hyman, Harold M. A More Perfect Union: The Impact of the Civil War and Reconstruction on the Constitution. (1973), ch 13. online edition
• Levine, Peter. "Draft Evasion in the North during the Civil War, 1863-1865," Journal of American History 67 (1981): 816-34 online edition
• Moore, Albert Burton. Conscription and Conflict in the Confederacy 1924 online edition
• Murdock, Eugene C. One Million Men: The Civil War Draft in the North (1971).
• Wheeler, Kenneth H. "Local Autonomy and Civil War Draft Resistance: Holmes County, Ohio." Civil War History. v.45#2 1999. pp 147+ online edition

World War I

• John Whiteclay Chambers II, To Raise an Army: The Draft Comes to Modern America (1987), comprehensive look at the national level.
• Ford, Nancy Gentile. "'Mindful of the Traditions of His Race': Dual Identity and Foreign-born Soldiers in the First World War American Army." Journal of American Ethnic History 1997 16(2): 35-57. Issn: 0278-5927 Fulltext: in Ebsco
• K. Walter Hickel. "'Justice and the Highest Kind of Equality Require Discrimination': Citizenship, Dependency, and Conscription in the South, 1917-1919." Journal of Southern History. v. 66#4 2000. pp 749+ online version
• Keith, Jeanette. "The Politics of Southern Draft Resistance, 1917-1918: Class, Race, and Conscription in the Rural South." Journal of American History 2000 87(4): 1335-1361. Issn: 0021-8723 Fulltext: in Jstor and Ebsco
• Jeanette Keith. Rich Man's War, Poor Man's Fight: Race, Class, and Power in the Rural South during the First World War. 2004. 260pp.
• David M. Kennedy. Over Here: The First Worm War and American Society (1980), ch 3 online edition
• Gerald E. Shenk, "Race, Manhood, and Manpower: Mobilizing Rural Georgia for World War I," Georgia Historical Quarterly, 81 (Fall 1997), 622-62
• C. Vann Woodward, Tom Watson, Agrarian Rebel (1938), pp 451–63.
• Sieger, Susan. "She Didn't Raise Her Boy to Be a Slacker: Motherhood, Conscription, and the Culture of the First World War." Feminist Studies. v.22#1 1996. pp 7+ online edition

World War II

• Flynn, George Q. The Draft, 1940-1973. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1993; the standard history
• Clifford J. Garry, and Samuel R. Spencer Jr. The First Peacetime Draft. 1986.
• Rachel Waltner Goossen; Women against the Good War: Conscientious Objection and Gender on the American Home Front, 1941-1947 1997 online edition
• Robert Westbrook, "'I Want a Girl Just Like the Girl That Married Harry James': American Women and the Problem of Political Obligation in WWII," American Quarterly 42 (December 1990 ): 587-614; online in JSTOR

Cold War

• Flynn, George Q. The Draft, 1940-1973. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1993; the standard history

Recent

• Warner, John T. and Beth J. Asch. "The Record and Prospects of the All-volunteer Military in the United States." Journal of Economic Perspectives 2001 15(2): 169-192. Issn: 0895-3309 Fulltext: in Jstor and Ebsco
• Evan M. Wooten; "Banging on the Backdoor Draft: The Constitutional Validity of Stop-Loss in the Military," William and Mary Law Review, Vol. 47, 2005 online version

Primary sources

• John Whiteclay Chambers II, ed. Draftees or Volunteers: A Documentary History of the Debate over Military Conscription in the United States, 1787-1973, (1975)

International Perpectives

• Flynn, George Q. "Conscription and Equity in Western Democracies, 1940-75." Journal of Contemporary History 1998 33(1): 5-20. Issn: 0022-0094 Fulltext: in Jstor and Ebsco
• Flynn, George Q. Conscription and Democracy: The Draft in France, Great Britain, and the United States. Greenwood, 2001. 303 pp.
• Levi, Margaret. "The Institution of Conscription." Social Science History 1996 20(1): 133-167. Issn: 0145-5532 Fulltext: in Swetswise and Jstor; looks at WW1 in different countries
• Levi, Margaret. Consent, Dissent, and Patriotism (1997) looks at citizens' responses to military conscription in several democracies since the French Revolution
• Lars Mjoset and Stephen Van Holde, eds. The Comparative Study of Conscription in the Armed Forces. Amsterdam, JAI Press/Elsevier Science Ltd., 2002, 424 pages.
• Stevenson, Michael D. Canada's Greatest Wartime Muddle: National Selective Service and the Mobilization of Human Resouces during World War II. McGill-Queen's U. Press, 2001. 235 pp.