User contributions
July 30, 2019
Talk:Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
might as well emphasize this
+19
Talk:Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
Make this more noticeable
+6
Talk:Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
Article creator: clues
+1,273
Talk:Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
no edit summary
-11
User talk:Abd
socks and impersonations: sign it!
+70
User talk:Abd
no edit summary
+34
Talk:Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
about the creation of this article on me and fact
+4,828
July 29, 2019
October 25, 2012
October 24, 2012
September 26, 2012
Cold fusion
Nuclear Fusion: true for all nuclei
-10
Cold fusion
Nuclear Fusion: other forms *are* possible
-12
Cold fusion
Nuclear Fusion: add
+481
September 5, 2012
Cold fusion
High Temperature Fusion: This source is not really a general source on hot fusion and is not in any way authoritative
-78
Cold fusion
Fleischmann Pons: clean up
-4
Cold fusion
Low Temperature Fusion: rm cap
m
September 4, 2012
Cold fusion
Low Temperature Fusion: muon-catalyzed fusion is a known and accepted efffect, not controversial
+12
Cold fusion
Low Temperature Fusion: remove hidden assumption by supplementing
+70
Cold fusion
High Temperature Fusion: self-sustaining isn't a direct consequence of achieving hot fusion. On earth,hot fusion isn't self-sustaining, generally.
-170
Cold fusion
Nuclear Fusion: more accurate
+269
August 9, 2012
August 7, 2012
August 5, 2012
User talk:Abd
the other place: popcorn in the microwave
+161
User talk:Brenden
Participate in Cold fusion?: Thanks.
+126
User talk:Abd
the other place: aw, ruined my day.
+203
User talk:Abd
Cold Fusion.: Just noticed that the one advocating this "netball" thing was you... I had no idea.
+357
Theocracy
Theocracy as tyranny: grammar, explain "Sharia law" is redundant in this case.
m+46
User talk:Brenden
Participate in Cold fusion?: new section
+2,777
User talk:Abd
Cold Fusion.: thanks, Wschact. I looked at the page you mention. I'm not eager to dive in.
+5,721
Talk:Cold fusion
repeated restoration of plagiarized text: new section
+2,749
Cold fusion
I poke the eye out of the URL to avoid the spam trap, those captchas often are illegible. Here goes it the restoration.
+9
Cold fusion
Undo revision 998343 by Brenden (talk)This edit restored poor text copied from another wiki. Please respect the request on the Talk page.
-1,150
User talk:Abd
Cold Fusion.: reply to Brenden. Please read up on this, I can provide suggested sources. Starting with the review I link to, which is the most comprehensive journal review ever on cold fusion.
+10,126
August 2, 2012
User talk:Michaeldsuarez
Email addresses?: looks like email was disabled, all right. Lots of references to it in old pages.
+687
User talk:Michaeldsuarez
Email addresses?: new section
+158
User talk:Abd
Thanks, Michael. I'm the Wikipedia editor Abd that you know.
+62
Cold fusion
Undo revision 997498 by Conservative (talk)Correct apparent error. This removes plagiarized content.
-1,141
Talk:Cold fusion
Okay, will restore original content, removing plagiarized content apparently restored in error.
+554
August 1, 2012
User talk:Edpell
Cold Fusion: format
+1
User talk:Edpell
Cold Fusion: respond to the comment made here, apparently Edpell didn't notice this or the edits.
+3,163
Cold fusion
clean this up. better. Remove weak source, refer to definitive recent review.
+660
July 31, 2012
Cold fusion
References: fix cat
+9
Cold fusion
References: Stereotypically, chemists say cold fusion is not chemistry, and physicists say it's not physics. The experimental work is chemistry, though.
+13
Cold fusion
References: It can be argued that Cold fusion is "fringe." Not that it is "pseudoscience." It's testable, it doesn't meet the pseudoscience characteristics at all.