Talk:Neurodiversity
From Conservapedia
This page seems to be very similar to Wikipedia's article on the same topic. Ylevental, are you the sole, original author of this content? Thanks! --David B (TALK) 15:45, 30 November 2016 (EST)
- The other articles he's either created or edited also are WP copies. --1990'sguy (talk) 16:44, 30 November 2016 (EST)
Why do you dislike autism rights advocates so much?
What's so bad about them? How have they negatively impacted your life? ChenXiansheng (talk) 23:40, January 6, 2023 (EST)
- Hmm, the creator of the page might be an RW troll trying to make conservatives look like "ableists" or something. If so, then it's ironic that the left, which supports the eugenic mass-murder of unborn children diagnosed with Down syndrome, is so prone to accusing the right of "ableism" or whatever new buzzword they'll sensationalize, as they are known to do. This article is likely part of a strawman scheme to slander Conservapedia and the right in general. —
LT(Mark 8:36) Saturday, 23:48, January 6, 2023 (EST)- I have decided to remove the biased content. Since conservatives claim to be respectful of people with disabilities, their words should reflect their actions. ChenXiansheng (talk) 21:37, January 7, 2023 (EST)
- Thanks for removing what may have been subversive trolling, ChenXiansheng. There's some suspicious content on Conservapedia that may have been added by RationalWiki trolls, and good-faith efforts to crack down on such insertions are quite appreciated. —
LT(Mark 8:36) Sunday, 21:43, January 7, 2023 (EST)- It's funny, because the person says he disagrees with the viewpoints of this website, which I also do, but if he really does disagree with them, then why is he writing the content that he disagrees with? ChenXiansheng (talk) 21:58, January 9, 2023 (EST)
- Well, it seems that if biases conform towards a supposed "right-wing" viewpoint, then it's allowed. That's unfortunately the attitude Conservapedia has been shaped by, thanks to RW trolls trying to make the site look as quackery and fringe as possible. —
LT(Mark 8:36) Tuesday, 22:04, January 9, 2023 (EST)
- Well, it seems that if biases conform towards a supposed "right-wing" viewpoint, then it's allowed. That's unfortunately the attitude Conservapedia has been shaped by, thanks to RW trolls trying to make the site look as quackery and fringe as possible. —
- It's funny, because the person says he disagrees with the viewpoints of this website, which I also do, but if he really does disagree with them, then why is he writing the content that he disagrees with? ChenXiansheng (talk) 21:58, January 9, 2023 (EST)
- Thanks for removing what may have been subversive trolling, ChenXiansheng. There's some suspicious content on Conservapedia that may have been added by RationalWiki trolls, and good-faith efforts to crack down on such insertions are quite appreciated. —
- I have decided to remove the biased content. Since conservatives claim to be respectful of people with disabilities, their words should reflect their actions. ChenXiansheng (talk) 21:37, January 7, 2023 (EST)
- RW has a bunch of "Aspies", as they are both derisively referred to and call themselves. So they brought much of the ongoing debates and arguments here, basically, as LT correctly observed, to make CP look bad to one side or the other of the debate. My guess is, without reviewing the content, to make CP come down on whichever side is viewed by consensus as the more bigoted side. We got a lot of these hidden time bombs here cause Admins in the past were intent on blocking everybody and anybody, and stifling debate and discussion. RobSGive Peace a chance 22:11, January 9, 2023 (EST)
- If that's true, then RW is ostensibly giving people with mental disabilities a bad name. Many people with such natural disorders carry deficiencies by no fault of their own and just try to live life normally, while RW goons choose to be stupid. It's also ironic that RW idiots frivolously think everything is "ableistic" except for the abortion genocide which disproportionately targets children with Down syndrome. —
LT(Mark 8:36) Tuesday, 22:17, January 9, 2023 (EST)
- If that's true, then RW is ostensibly giving people with mental disabilities a bad name. Many people with such natural disorders carry deficiencies by no fault of their own and just try to live life normally, while RW goons choose to be stupid. It's also ironic that RW idiots frivolously think everything is "ableistic" except for the abortion genocide which disproportionately targets children with Down syndrome. —
- RW has a bunch of "Aspies", as they are both derisively referred to and call themselves. So they brought much of the ongoing debates and arguments here, basically, as LT correctly observed, to make CP look bad to one side or the other of the debate. My guess is, without reviewing the content, to make CP come down on whichever side is viewed by consensus as the more bigoted side. We got a lot of these hidden time bombs here cause Admins in the past were intent on blocking everybody and anybody, and stifling debate and discussion. RobSGive Peace a chance 22:11, January 9, 2023 (EST)
- Downs Syndrome and Aspergers are basically children born from parents in their late 30s and 40s on up. It's not really much of a disease. RobSGive Peace a chance 22:39, January 9, 2023 (EST)
ADHD is curable. You are taking a defeatist attitude
A lady in an office building I worked in used the AVE technology produced by this Canadian company and was cured within a month. Many schools are now using this technology successfully.
This article is too woke!
But I do realize that we live in a fallen world and some people have incurable diseases from a medical perspective. But even then, God can work miracles.Conservative (talk) 22:27, January 9, 2023 (EST)
- Alright then, you and ChenXiansheng can negotiate a solution to fix it. —
LT(Mark 8:36) Tuesday, 22:08, January 9, 2023 (EST)
- ADHD doesn't exist. It's a medical fraud to sell pills for Big Pharma. RobSGive Peace a chance 22:35, January 9, 2023 (EST)
