User talk:Jpatt/2010

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Good addition. I'm quite surprised it wasn't on the list to begin with! DouglasA 13:33, 4 January 2010 (EST)

Thanks--Jpatt 15:45, 9 January 2010 (EST)

Breaking news

Hi Mr. Patt, I don't know how to submit news events for the main page, but I've come across a disturbing selection of Obama's, he appointed a transvestite, sexual deviant, to a high position in the department of commerce I believe.

I think this should go on the mainpage, I'm surprised nobody here has picked up on it. Sickening stuff. - Glenn.

I agree Obama is annoying with his unscrupulous picks. I don't wish to condemn this person unless of course he/she is an advocate for transgender laws. Thanks for pointing it out, another admin may be tempted to put it up. --Jpatt 14:21, 5 January 2010 (EST)
Great judgment, Jpatt, which illustrates why you're such a terrific Admin. and front-page headline writer. This news item concerns someone hired merely as "senior technical advisor at the Commerce Department." That may be front page news for other sites, but we're more substantive here.--Andy Schlafly 14:35, 5 January 2010 (EST)

Medical articles

Hi Jpatt, I don't know if you remember but you helped me out with my first article on urology. I can't edit at school, but since I am at home on break now, I am trying to improve the medical content on this website. What I would like to do is create a category called "Branches of Medicine" which could include urology, neurology, cardiology, etc. However, I am new to wiki language, so would you be able to help me out with that?--JordanA 14:38, 9 January 2010 (EST)

I'll look into it.--Jpatt 15:45, 9 January 2010 (EST)


Thanks. AlexWD 15:40, 9 January 2010 (EST)

Thank you--Jpatt 15:45, 9 January 2010 (EST)

1% atheist?

Sounds a little optimistic to me, I seem to remember a pew study saying 5% just recently; And thanks for the welcome. --ThomasRidgefield 14:36, 12 January 2010 (EST)

A 2007 study has it at just over 1% [1] or this [2]. Thanks for editing here. --Jpatt 14:42, 12 January 2010 (EST)

Sydnee Waggoner?

Seems legit to me. (See here, also). Why remove it? AlexWD 21:00, 12 January 2010 (EST)

The article was created by a now blocked user. While she is real the information in the article was false. You may recreate if you wish.--Jpatt 21:11, 12 January 2010 (EST)
While the editor may have been blocked/in bad faith (and I respect your call as an admin to get rid of it on those grounds), I edited the article in question and it corresponded pretty much exactly to what's given in the first link--it would be easier if you could just undelete it, I think...AlexWD 21:17, 12 January 2010 (EST)
I will undelete then remove factless additions.--Jpatt 21:20, 12 January 2010 (EST)

My hole

I always fall in the same hole. Thanks. --Joaquín Martínez 10:54, 16 January 2010 (EST)

Asymmetrical warfare

I'm pretty sure this term refers to conflicts between combatants of starkly different power: ie. USA vs Iraqi/Afghan insurgents, not cyberwarfare, which could possibly be a tactic in such conflicts. DouglasA 15:23, 22 January 2010 (EST)

Possibly, the ref gives a good picture of the term. Can be used by govt, by mafia or Al Qaeda. Cyberwarfare and cyber-terrorism seem pretty close. Change it if you determine otherwise. --Jpatt 15:28, 22 January 2010 (EST)

Thank you

Thank you for welcoming me. I sent you email with the image.Friscokid7 14:57, 30 January 2010 (EST)

In the News

Hi Jpatt! I don't think I have permission to edit the "In the News" section on the homepage, but thought this would be a great news-worthy article (or a more in depth one): It's Abraham Lincoln's birthday!! DerekE 10:51, 12 February 2010 (EST)

Well done!

Terrific block and revert.--Andy Schlafly 10:57, 26 February 2010 (EST)

Cut and Paste from Wikipedia

I'm not sure you're the right person to tell about this, but this article looks to be a cut and paste from Wikipedia.


Thanks for blocking JordanS, his only edit seems to have been to target me, and I don't know why Myrobi 13:23, 2 March 2010 (EST)

Good addition

Great addition: "mind-locked", to describe "deliberate ignorance" in Essay:Best New Conservative Words. Thanks for your insight.--Andy Schlafly 00:03, 15 March 2010 (EDT)

Thank you as always for this great site. Inspired by user:Daniel1212 article to mainpage:talk --Jpatt 00:12, 15 March 2010 (EDT)

Algore opened his mouth again

Says Global warming is the cause of a storm last week in the northeast.[3] More lies and deceit, typical, but could be news worthy... DerekE 11:54, 16 March 2010 (EDT)

I'll look into it.--Jpatt 12:45, 16 March 2010 (EDT)
Cool! It's the same rhetoric that Obama spews when spreading global warming deceit, so it may simply belong in the Climategate or Global warming article. I just found it humorous enough to show you. Also - thanks for adding the picture for Scott Taylor's page, too! DerekE 13:01, 16 March 2010 (EDT)


Thanks for the welcome!

Social Justice

Hi Jpatt. I was curious as to why social justice is capitalized in the article Social Justice. They way I've seen it, it's spelled with lowercase lettering. TGyver 12:25, 21 March 2010 (EDT)

I noticed the opposite, so I changed it.--Jpatt 12:27, 21 March 2010 (EDT)
Looking at the external links added to the article, it seems to be the opposite of the opposite. TGyver 12:29, 21 March 2010 (EDT)

Hey there, Jpatt.

Hey, how're you today? Just wondered if there's any place at all that you guys chat and discuss things? IRC or do you exchange email addresses? I updated my user page, hope it fits in. --Newton 17:04, 26 March 2010 (EDT)

Grammar correction

The news story you just posted has a run-on sentence. It should read "California's budget woes aren't going away. Now the state is considering legalizing and taxing marijuana." Currently there is a comma after "away" and "now" isn't capitalized. -- Jeff W. LauttamusDiscussion 19:45, 26 March 2010 (EDT)

Christianity in conservatism template?

Should we put it in the worldview template? Most conservatives are Christian, but I do know of a few conservative Jews as well. DouglasA 01:49, 27 March 2010 (EDT)

I thought about that but to be inclusive I just added God. May need to be decided by the best of the public. Ah, another entry!--Jpatt 01:54, 27 March 2010 (EDT)
Politics knows no one religion, and we decided long ago to leave it all out, but I do agree with John here, God should be fine! And what is this "Worldview" template you speak of? Grrrrrr --ṬK/Admin/Talk 04:20, 27 March 2010 (EDT)

The Shroud of Turin needs one more rollback

I did one okay but had a spam filter problem on the second, so it's still in a vandalized state. Can you fix it? Thanks. --ChrisY 11:45, 6 April 2010 (EDT)

Vandalism on a locked article

I tried to roll back some vandalism to the Warren G. Harding article but it was protected. Can you or someone with rights get that one? Thanks. --ChrisY 09:57, 30 April 2010 (EDT)

Whew! Thanks!

I was trying to fight off a vandal, (not very effectively,) and then I had to leave for tennis practice. Sorry if I cause you any extra hassle, and thanks for taking down the vandal! David Talk 17:58, 30 April 2010 (EDT)

AUP is investigating the abuse from DMorris 15:46, 17 May 2010 (EDT)


Thank you for the warm greeting Jpatt! Its a pleasure to be able to help maintain this prestigious site.--Khoffhines 20:54, 23 May 2010 (EDT)

Conservatives and intelligence

Enjoy: [4]. Jinx McHue 17:30, 26 May 2010 (EDT)

Much, much better. Thanks--Jpatt 17:34, 26 May 2010 (EDT)

Please explain your reverts

i really don't understand this. I'm not trying to cause problems. KeepingPace 12:06, 5 June 2010 (EDT)

Thank you for notifying us. Personal messages should be personal, especially when you want to announce to the world a smear on Andy. I assure you he is aware, as all of us administrators are, of vile liberalism attacking each and every outspoken conservative. --Jpatt 12:10, 5 June 2010 (EDT)
It would be nice to mention that in the comment of your revert. Simply putting "He is aware of this already" would've been sufficient. KeepingPace 12:13, 5 June 2010 (EDT)
Well I doubted your sincerity, assumed you were to be blocked for causing trouble until you mentioned you were not.--Jpatt 12:15, 5 June 2010 (EDT)


The vandal you just took care of also created some articles, How to play conservatroll and Recent changes (that's an article, not the Special:RC page); if you could delete those that'd be awesome! I'm off to work, so I'm super glad you're around!--IDuan 10:39, 8 June 2010 (EDT)

Your blocking tip

Thanks for the heads up, Jpatt; I didn't realize that was against the Commandments, but I'll keep away from that in the future. Thank you! Tyler Zoran Talk 12:44, 1 July 2010 (EDT)

Superb block and revert!

Superb block and revert on this Independence Day!--Andy Schlafly 13:26, 4 July 2010 (EDT)

ty --Jpatt 23:59, 4 July 2010 (EDT)

Fascinating 1925 word

Fascinating 1925 word that you just added. Now only the 1700s needs one to complete the perfect rate of doubling each century.--Andy Schlafly 23:54, 4 July 2010 (EDT)

Thanks as always --Jpatt 23:59, 4 July 2010 (EDT)

Very nice completion indeed

"Apple pie" ... a perfect final word!--Andy Schlafly 15:08, 5 July 2010 (EDT)


I apologize if my rebuttal sounds a little condescending; I didn't intend for it to, but it sort of sounded that way when I re-read it later. Just prepare yourself knowing that it shouldn't be read as any more than a respectful counter claim. Anyway, I think we should finalize whether or not Scarborough is a Republican in more than just name. See Talk:Republican in name only#Joe Scarborough ChrisGT90 20:45, 18 July 2010 (EDT)

No apology required. Sorry, I just don't think Scarborough is anything but a RINO. You mention his conservative voting record, which is a good point. Let me ask you, does anybody think fondly of Ronald Reagan's liberal beginnings? No, because later in life he made his mark as a conservative. The same can be said of Joe, does anybody think fondly of Joe's conservative past? All he is known for is his present job as Republican bashing, liberal news host. Review this link [5] and if you still want to debate it, ask another admin that has contributed to the RINO page.--Jpatt 21:25, 18 July 2010 (EDT)

Thanks again!!!

Jpatt, I just wanted to thank you again for the help uploading pictures of the Wenatchee Larkspur. One of the pictures I sent was accidentally turned on its side rather than upright, which was probably my fault when sending them to you. But the fact is I couldn't have gotten ball rolling with article nor the pictures uploaded without your help - so here's one of many thanks to you! You rock! DerekE 20:21, 22 July 2010 (EDT)

Another one for you...


The Scream

Hey, thanks for catching that idiotic vandalism on the page for The Scream. Of all the various types of internet trolling, I find writing random, "wacky" things to be the most insufferable. Nice catch! EMorris 11:29, 12 August 2010 (EDT)

Thanks E-rock --Jpatt 22:04, 12 August 2010 (EDT)

update - been asked for my advice and source of really good pictures

Got some feedback from a sysop. The sysop was wondering now that Joaquin is not so active and left main page and I will be less active except for big creation/evolution/Christianity stories, who will be doing left main page edits more and what should be on left main page. Since I seem to have a knack for finding interesting pictures (current pic of dogs, recent fire pic, etc) and for certain newsworthy times like the rosy North Dakota employment rate news, etc. etc. , I have been asked for my two cents on the left main page.

Here is my advice: Keep the popular articles at Conservapedia section, keep the evolution section since that is a "liberal sacred cow" we seem to be poking well with the creation science cattle prod :) , but have more politics with pictures on the left main page. Here is how you find interesting public domain pictures at flickr: I would also recommend this site for public domain pictures as long as the person does not mark it as private: I really think politics is going to be a big issue for at least 3 years as the SS Obama ship goes down in terms of the economy and the new Republican or even third party person replaces Obama. Of course, maybe things will change and I will get more interested in politics so maybe I will get more active on left side of main page. conservative 22:12, 25 August 2010 (EDT)

Why was my edit reverted in the Obamacare article?

Just wondering my my deletion of the "Treatment of the eldery" section was reverted back? It had no reference linked with it and, I believe, it was actually from an Onion article a while back. Why should it be kept? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by ConservaPeter (talk)

I should have explained my revert. Sarah was correct and more sources than The Onion stated that. I left it in because the section needs expanding, not deletion. --Jpatt 22:56, 28 August 2010 (EDT)
I agree with that, but a reference and link should be included.


Superb perfection of geometric fit!

"Common sense" - a superb term indeed to complete the doubling by century in Best New Conservative Words. Congratulations.--Andy Schlafly 23:53, 10 October 2010 (EDT)


Thanks for archiving the main page, J. --Ed Poor Talk 22:24, 25 November 2010 (EST)

No problem friend, Happy Thanksgiving!--Jpatt 22:38, 25 November 2010 (EST)

Fred Phelps

I have finished my edits on the article now. Thanks for the temporary unlock.

Barclay 16:15, 17 December 2010 (EST)


Sir, I sent you an email about images for Conservapedia. Have you checked it recently? DMorris 09:48, 20 December 2010 (EST)

Affirmative, photos uploaded [7] [8] [9] --Jpatt 11:52, 21 December 2010 (EST)

Merry Christmas!!!

Feliz navidad. --Joaquín Martínez 13:03, 24 December 2010 (EST)

Merry Christmas! conservative 19:03, 25 December 2010 (EST)
Thank you, God bless!--Jpatt 16:20, 26 December 2010 (EST)
Best wishes for the upcoming new year. conservative 20:18, 27 December 2010 (EST).