User talk:RationalHindu
From Conservapedia
You do not get to unilaterally decide what belongs on this website
As a new junior user, if you have issues with the way an article is written, discuss it in the talk page of an article and present reliable sources to back up your claims. Do not just unilaterally change an article. Shobson20 (talk) 19:20, 16 April 2020 (EDT)
- Sorry, some other wikis I edit for are a lot more liberal when it comes to who can edit and how much. I understand though may I at least fix the grammar of the article? --RationalHindu (talk) 13:16, 17 April 2020 (EDT)
- Even other wikis do not tolerate junior users continuing to edit war with moderators. And yes, the rules are strict, you were pushing the article towards a more liberal point of view, and this is CONSERVapedia. Karajou a senior administrator locked the article so you'll have to ask him to unlock it. Your knowledge of Islam seems to be lacking, check out Acts17Apologetics and Apostate Prophet on YouTube to learn many of Islam's shocking secrets. Shobson20 (talk) 13:41, 17 April 2020 (EDT)
- So in other words, not if you're just going to use that opportunity to revert the article back to the edit that you want (which basically whitewashes what Islam really is and turns the article into the way you want it to be). Sorry, RationalHindu, but no dice. Northwest (talk) 13:49, 17 April 2020 (EDT)
- Even other wikis do not tolerate junior users continuing to edit war with moderators. And yes, the rules are strict, you were pushing the article towards a more liberal point of view, and this is CONSERVapedia. Karajou a senior administrator locked the article so you'll have to ask him to unlock it. Your knowledge of Islam seems to be lacking, check out Acts17Apologetics and Apostate Prophet on YouTube to learn many of Islam's shocking secrets. Shobson20 (talk) 13:41, 17 April 2020 (EDT)
