Difference between revisions of "Atheism and reason"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 35: Line 35:
 
*[http://fidedubitandum.wordpress.com/2013/04/18/atheism-and-the-inability-to-think/ Atheism and the Inability to Think]
 
*[http://fidedubitandum.wordpress.com/2013/04/18/atheism-and-the-inability-to-think/ Atheism and the Inability to Think]
 
*[http://www.apologetics315.com/2012/11/book-review-cs-lewiss-dangerous-idea-in.html Book Review: C.S. Lewis's Dangerous Idea: In Defense of the Argument from Reason by Victor Reppert]
 
*[http://www.apologetics315.com/2012/11/book-review-cs-lewiss-dangerous-idea-in.html Book Review: C.S. Lewis's Dangerous Idea: In Defense of the Argument from Reason by Victor Reppert]
 +
 +
== Atheism and irrationality ==
 +
 +
[[File:113320508 2b86fdb94a.jpg|thumb|201px|right|A common and legitimate criticism of the [[atheist worldview]] is that [[atheism]] is irrational.<ref>[http://carm.org/cut-atheism Atheism] by Matt Slick
 +
*[http://www.iclnet.org/pub/resources/text/cri/cri-jrnl/web/crj0131a.html Putting the Atheist on the Defensive] by Kenneth R. Samples, Christian Research Institute Journal, Fall 1991, and Winter 1992, page 7.
 +
*[http://www.faithstreet.com/onfaith/2012/03/21/atheists-dont-own-reason/10924 Atheists don’t own reason] by Tom Gilson
 +
* [http://www.leaderu.com/truth/1truth11.html Why the Burden of Proof is on the Atheist] by Professor Ralph McInerny
 +
* [http://www.leaderu.com/truth/3truth02.html Theism, Atheism, and Rationality] by [[Alvin Plantinga]]
 +
*''[http://www.voxday.net/mart/TIA_free.pdf The Irrational atheist]: Dissecting the Unholy Trinity of Dawkins, Harris, and Hitchens by [[Vox Day]], Benbella Books, Dallas, TX, 2008'' , ISBN-10: 1933771364; ISBN-13: 978-1933771366
 +
</ref> ]]
 +
A common and legitimate criticism of the [[atheist worldview]] is that [[atheism]] is irrational.<ref>[http://carm.org/cut-atheism Atheism] by Matt Slick
 +
*[http://www.iclnet.org/pub/resources/text/cri/cri-jrnl/web/crj0131a.html Putting the Atheist on the Defensive] by Kenneth R. Samples, Christian Research Institute Journal, Fall 1991, and Winter 1992, page 7.
 +
*[http://www.faithstreet.com/onfaith/2012/03/21/atheists-dont-own-reason/10924 Atheists don’t own reason] by Tom Gilson
 +
* [http://www.leaderu.com/truth/1truth11.html Why the Burden of Proof is on the Atheist] by Professor Ralph McInerny
 +
* [http://www.leaderu.com/truth/3truth02.html Theism, Atheism, and Rationality] by [[Alvin Plantinga]]
 +
*''[http://www.voxday.net/mart/TIA_free.pdf The Irrational atheist]: Dissecting the Unholy Trinity of Dawkins, Harris, and Hitchens by [[Vox Day]], Benbella Books, Dallas, TX, 2008'' , ISBN-10: 1933771364; ISBN-13: 978-1933771366
 +
</ref> In short, atheism is a fundamentally incoherent worldview with a number of inconsistencies.<ref>
 +
*[http://grayknight.hubpages.com/hub/Top-10-Atheist-Inconsistencies 10 atheist inconsistencies]
 +
*[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J4K_WZpIkM4 William Lane Craig on Scientific Naturalism] - video
 +
*[http://www.scottmsullivan.com/why-atheism-is-incoherent/ Why atheism is inconsistent] by Dr. Scott Sullivan (podcast),  August 19th, 2014
 +
*[http://vimeo.com/102663614 The Summit Lecture Series: Scientific Naturalism Worldview with J.P. Moreland, part 1]
 +
*[http://vimeo.com/103277405 The Summit Lecture Series: Scientific Naturalism with J.P. Moreland, part 2]
 +
*[http://vimeo.com/103865278 The Summit Lecture Series: Scientific Naturalism with J.P. Moreland, part 3]
 +
*[http://vimeo.com/105068126 The Summit Lecture Series: Scientific Naturalism Worldview with J.P. Moreland, part 4]
 +
*[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K6cTlDn4PiU The Incoherence of Atheism] - video by [[Ravi Zacharias]]
 +
*[http://justandsinner.blogspot.com/2012/08/the-incoherence-of-atheism.html The incoherence of atheism]
 +
*[http://ephesians4-15.blogspot.com/2012/11/more-on-inconsistent-atheists.html More on inconsistent atheists]
 +
*''The Atheist's Fatal Flaw: Exposing Conflicting Beliefs'' by [[Norman Geisler]] and Daniel J. McCoy, Baker Publishing Group, June 2014
 +
</ref>
 +
 +
== Atheistic worldview cannot account for the laws of logic ==
 +
 +
''See also:'' [[Atheism and logic]] and [[Transcendental argument for the existence of God]]
 +
 +
The atheistic worldview cannot account for the laws of [[logic]] (See: [[Atheism and logic]]).<ref>
 +
*[https://answersingenesis.org/world-religions/atheism/atheism-an-irrational-worldview/ Atheism: An irrational worldview] by Dr. Jason Lisle on October 10, 2007
 +
*[http://carm.org/christian-worldview-atheist-worldview-and-logic The Christian Worldview, the Atheist Worldview, and Logic] by Matt Slick
 +
*[http://answersforhope.org/portfolio_item/can-atheism-coherently-explain-the-laws-of-logic/  Can Atheism Coherently Explain the Laws of Logic?] by Answers for Hope
 +
* [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1hSx2evTGM The Great Debate: Does God Exist?] (YouTube video) or [http://veritasdomain.wordpress.com/2006/12/05/greg-bahnsen-vs-gordon-stein-the-great-debate/ "The Great Debate: Does God Exist?"] - Dr. [[Greg Bahnsen]] versus Dr. Gordon Stein - Audio of a formal debate between Christian Greg Bahnsen and skeptic Gordon Stein at the University of California, Irvine.</ref>
  
 
== Atheist worldview cannot explain consciousness ==
 
== Atheist worldview cannot explain consciousness ==

Revision as of 17:02, October 27, 2015

If naturalism is true, then we ought not to trust our capacity for reason for the human brain would be a byproduct of blind/unintelligent natural forces. [1]

Atheism/naturalism and reason are incompatible.[2] Therefore, believing in naturalism is self-defeating. In short, if naturalism is true, then we ought not to trust our capacity for reason for the human brain would be a byproduct of blind/unintelligent natural forces. [3]

C.S. Lewis's argument for reason and for the irrationality of materialism

Atheism and irrationality

A common and legitimate criticism of the atheist worldview is that atheism is irrational.[4]

A common and legitimate criticism of the atheist worldview is that atheism is irrational.[5] In short, atheism is a fundamentally incoherent worldview with a number of inconsistencies.[6]

Atheistic worldview cannot account for the laws of logic

See also: Atheism and logic and Transcendental argument for the existence of God

The atheistic worldview cannot account for the laws of logic (See: Atheism and logic).[7]

Atheist worldview cannot explain consciousness

The atheist worldview cannot explain the existence of consciousness either and the theistic worldview can offer a reasonable explanation.[8]

Advocates of mind uploading (Mind uploading is the notion that someday mankind may be able to scan and upload their minds to computer storage mediums) are generally strong advocates of cryonics as well.[9] Mind uploading is not a feasible hypothesis.[10] See also: Atheism and cryonics

Existence of consciousness

Mind uploading: Wishful atheist thinking

Mind uploading is the notion that someday mankind may be able to scan and upload their minds to mechanical storage mediums. Mind loading is not feasible. According to the Oxford University philosopher Nick Bostrum, the notion that one can upload one's mind into into mechanical storage mediums has its roots in atheistic/secular humanism and evolutionary ideologies.[11] The atheist, evolutionist and eugenicist Julian Huxley coined the term transhumanism.[12] See: Atheism and transhumanism

Information on the unfeasibility of mind uploading:

Atheism and brain function

See also: Atheism and brain function and Atheism and intelligence

Study involving magnetism, brain function and the posterior medial frontal cortex

See also: Causes of atheism and Atheism and logic and Atheism and logical fallacies

The organization American Vision wrote about a University of York study involving magnetism and brain function:

“ This has to be embarrassing . . . if you’re an atheist. A new study performed at the University of York used targeted magnetism to shut down part of the brain. The result: belief in God disappeared among more than 30 percent of participants.

That in itself may not seem so embarrassing, but consider that the specific part of the brain they frazzled was the posterior medial frontal cortex—the part associated with detecting and solving problems, i.e., reasoning and logic.

In other words, when you shut down the part of the brain most associated with logic and reasoning, greater levels of atheism result.[13]

”

Religious individuals and thicker cerebral cortices

According to the Journal of the American Medical Association - Psychiatry people who place a high importance of religion in their lives have thicker cerebral cortices and may be better able to fight depression.[14][15] See: Atheism and depression

Thicker cerebral cortices in individuals is positively associated with higher intelligence.[16]

See also

References

  1. ↑
  2. ↑
  3. ↑
  4. ↑ Atheism by Matt Slick
  5. ↑ Atheism by Matt Slick
  6. ↑
  7. ↑
  8. ↑ The Argument from Consciousness for the Existence of God by John Piippo, 3/20/2012
  9. ↑ Mind uploading - Thought experiments as knowledge
  10. ↑
  11. ↑ A HISTORY OF TRANSHUMANIST THOUGHT, Nick Bostrom, Faculty of Philosophy, Oxford University
  12. ↑ A HISTORY OF TRANSHUMANIST THOUGHT, Nick Bostrom, Faculty of Philosophy, Oxford University
  13. ↑ Atheists embarrassed: study proves atheism uses less brain function
  14. ↑ [1]
  15. ↑ [2]
  16. ↑ [3]
Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Atheism_and_reason&oldid=1177574"