Difference between revisions of "Global climate disruption"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
(→‎References: clean up & uniformity)
Line 5: Line 5:
  
 
{{Climategate scandal}}
 
{{Climategate scandal}}
−
[[Category: Global Warming]]
+
[[Category:Global Warming]]
−
[[Category: Earth Sciences]]
+
[[Category:Earth Sciences]]
−
[[Category: Environmentalism]]
+
[[Category:Environmentalism]]
−
[[Category: Liberal Falsehoods]]
+
[[Category:Liberal Falsehoods]]

Revision as of 21:54, June 27, 2016

Global climate disruption is a term used as an alternative to "global warming." Global climate disruption is a terminology change urged by the Obama administration to replace global warming, and was first used by White House science adviser John Holdren in a 2007 presentation and again in September, 2010.[1] Holdren's "global climate disruption" isn't the most convoluted term to grace the climate debate, however. According to a Fox News report, NASA published studies on the impact humans had on global climate and referred to the relationship as "inadvertent climate modification."[2]

References

  1. ↑ Climate‐Change Science and Policy: What Do We Know? What Should We Do? (PDF), by John P. Holdren, Kavli Prize Symposium,International Cooperation in Science, 6 September 2010.
  2. ↑ It's unclear why John Holdren prefers "global climate disruption" over "climate change," the most commonly used alternative to "global warming." White House: Global Warming Out, 'Global Climate Disruption' In, FoxNews.com, September 16, 2010.