Difference between revisions of "Talk:Debate: Have the gates of hell prevailed against the church Jesus founded on a rock, when He Himself said it could never happen? Did Christ who cannot lie fail to fulfill his promise?"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→The title of this debate is unacceptable: reply to RobSmith) |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
:::He's making a statement. If nobody signs up in a few days a few days, a speedy tag could be hung. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Trump 2Q2Q]]</sup> 23:20, 26 August 2020 (EDT) | :::He's making a statement. If nobody signs up in a few days a few days, a speedy tag could be hung. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Trump 2Q2Q]]</sup> 23:20, 26 August 2020 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::::So a debate page can be deleted for the sheer reason that no one participates, if such is the case? —[[User:Liberaltears|Liberaltears]]<sup>'''''[[User:Liberaltears/mail|May Dataclarifier be well!]] | [[Special:Contributions/Liberaltears|Don't be an anti-Catholic zealot!]]'''''</sup> Thursday, 23:23, 26 August 2020 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 03:23, August 27, 2020
I set up the debate page with a "Yes" and "No" format, but I will not participate. I have made my view known on other debate pages listed on this debate page under the See also section. May God bless you all. Pax vobiscum. --Dataclarifier (talk) 21:19, 26 August 2020 (EDT)
- Good. Be a slacker. My response will serve as the response of the community, and if you try this stunt again, I'll pursue getting it deleted with the assistance of RobS. VargasMilan (talk) Wednesday, 22:22, 26 August 2020 (EDT)
The title of this debate is unacceptable
Neither I nor RobSmith will accept a Debate whose title is based on such a loaded premise. We reject the very notion that the Roman Catholic Church as it exists today is the same church that "Jesus founded on the a rock" and that "the gates of Hell will not prevail against." Shobson20 (talk) 22:05, 26 August 2020 (EDT)
- The question, as stated, makes little sense, needs to be shortened, and re-phrased.
- My guess is DC wants to use it as another spamfest. Fine. But once the spam is posted here, it should not be allowed to be cut and pasted unto other good faith Debate pages, IMO. RobSTrump 2Q2Q 23:06, 26 August 2020 (EDT)
- Look at the top of this page. He already told us he wouldn't be participating, even though he's the one who set it up. VargasMilan (talk) Wednesday, 23:16, 26 August 2020 (EDT)
- He's making a statement. If nobody signs up in a few days a few days, a speedy tag could be hung. RobSTrump 2Q2Q 23:20, 26 August 2020 (EDT)
- So a debate page can be deleted for the sheer reason that no one participates, if such is the case? —LiberaltearsMay Dataclarifier be well! | Don't be an anti-Catholic zealot! Thursday, 23:23, 26 August 2020 (EDT)