User talk:Jackin the box

Thanks for your suggestions!--Andy Schlafly (talk) 14:24, January 17, 2022 (EST)

Re: Vaccine

You need to stop making edits in the Vaccine article that continually attempt to force a liberal/pro-CCP flu "vaccine"/not legitimately sourced viewpoint on it. Northwest (talk) 11:17, February 20, 2022 (EST)

What rubbish Northwest. See my comments at Talk:Vaccine#Recent reverts. I'm not a liberal, by the way. To repeat, my edits were based on reliable sources, and included much supported by other pages on Conservapedia, —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jackin the box (talk)

Yet the edits you made were pro-CCP flu "vaccines", which is supported by liberals based squarely on politics, ideology and pseudo-science (and thus makes those edits pushing of a liberal POV). Northwest (talk) 11:46, February 20, 2022 (EST)

You made mention of edit warring in your latest edit summary - but that was edit warring which you started for the sake of imposing a liberal/pro CCP flu "vaccine" POV. Next POV edit you make, you get blocked for a day. Northwest (talk) 13:09, February 20, 2022 (EST)

Proposal: Place alternative language on the talk language for discussion and vetting before editing mainspace. RobS^{Let's Go Brandon!} 13:15, February 20, 2022 (EST)

Thanks RobS. I remain puzzled what questions relating to a poorly written sentence have to do with politics. Furthermore my comments about Conservapedia articles backing my POV have been ignored by Northwest. But I'm tired of repeating myself and enjoy editing not arguing. --Jackin the box (talk) 13:33, February 20, 2022 (EST)

Well, the politization of science needs its own article, and vaccines certainly could or would be discussed there. Right now we need factual information for vaccines. RobS^{Let's Go Brandon!} 13:47, February 20, 2022 (EST)