Difference between revisions of "User talk:Lawrence2023"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Splitting, a gossipy, failed narcissistic smear campaign and other stark raving madness. Let's make Conservapedia great and end this insanity. P.S. America first - not Russia first!  ==
+
==See my newest Essay==
 +
*[[Essay: Why a Conservapedian falling for a chatbot is like a man who is seduced by a corrupt 300 pound woman]].
  
[[File:Matador1.jpg|alt=machismo|thumbnail|400px|One of the definitions of machismo is an "exhilarating sense of power or strength."[https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/machismo]
+
==''[[NYT]]'': [https://www.nytimes.com/video/opinion/100000010529017/can-the-right-confront-antisemitism-in-its-ranks.html Can the Right Confront Antisemitism in Its Ranks?]==
<br />
+
[[File:True conservatives don't believe in the very liberal concept of hate crimes! Conservative (talk) 18 59, October 1 2025.PNG|center|850px|thumb|[[User:Conservative]] turned [[Conservapedia]] into a [[neo-Nazi]] [[fascist]] and [[antisemitic]] mouthpiece.]]
<br />
+
:[https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA_6015c7db-5036-43da-9bea-3a133104ad3e Why is it that many American conservatives don't believe in the concept of hate crimes?]
<big>'''Olé! Olé! Olé!'''</big>]]
 
[[Splitting (psychology)|Splitting]] is a psychological [[defense mechanism]] practiced by people with [[narcissistic personality disorder]] that causes them to see things in completely all-or-nothing extremes.
 
  
This is why RobSmith sees himself, Russia, Vladimir Putin and all of Russia's allies (including Communist China) as being completely good and perfect.  
+
:'''Summary:''' "Many American conservatives oppose hate crime laws primarily because they view them as violating principles of equal justice under the law, punishing thought or motive rather than action alone, risking inconsistent or politicized enforcement, and potentially infringing on free speech—preferring instead that all violent crimes be prosecuted equally regardless of bias motivation."
  
[[Narcissistic smear campaign]]s are campaigns by people with narcissistic personality disorder designed to lift themselves up and make their target look bad.  It naturally flows from "splitting".
+
:I trust this clarifies matters. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 11:48, December 18, 2025 (EST)
  
This explains RobSmith's idiotic. very unsuccessful  and gossipy campaign to try make me be a Nazi,  Biden-loving,  neocon, Zelinsky loving, truly evil man in other people's eyes. It also explains why RobSmith told User: LT not to criticize socialists and communists during the war in Ukraine.  As much as I hate to say it, gossip girls narcissistic smear campaign completely failed as evidenced by RobSmith's so-called [[Team CP]] only having himself as a member. On the other hand, the CP Civility Association which I endorsed has 900% more members. So I confidently declare with complete confidence and [[machismo]] total victory! Olé! Olé! Olé!
+
==User:Conservative trolling==
 
+
[[File:Keynes.jpg|center|thumbnail|650px|[[Keynesian Economics]] was "the dominant [[economic]] paradigm from the 1940s to the 1970s."
RobSmith's [[narcissistic rivalry]] behavior essentially caps his IQ as being no higher than 120.[https://www.psypost.org/highly-intelligent-grandiose-narcissists-are-less-prone-to-narcissistic-rivalry/] And RobSmith does use a lot of [[Logical fallacy|logical fallacies]]. Perhaps, RobSmith knows deep down that he isn't brilliant and perfect and that he may be very far from the view of himself that he envisions in his very narcissistic brain!
+
It is associated with the ideas of the incompetent [[British]] economist and [[John Maynard Keynes and pederasty|pedophile]] [[John Maynard Keynes]].<ref>
 
+
*[http://www.keynesatharvard.org/book/KeynesatHarvard-ch09.html KEYNES AT HARVARD Economic Deception as a Political Credo BY ZYGMUND DOBBS]
I hope Andy puts an end to the cartoonish, fantasy world of RobSmith that is complete madness. RobSmith is dumbing down Conservapedia.  
+
*[http://centurean2.wordpress.com/2011/03/20/fabian-john-maynard-keynes-the-stealthy-enemy-of-human-freedom/ John Maynard Keynes the stealthy enemy of human freedom]
 
+
*[https://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-02-22/deathbed-of-keynesian-economics-will-be-in-u-k-matthew-lynn.html Deathbed of Keynesian Economics will be in the UK]
'''Quote of RobSmith:''' "IOWs, if you don't have anything positive to say about socialists and communists, just shut up, at least for the duration of the war. Read the bios of Bill Donovan, Frank Knox, and Henry Stimson. And if you don't know what I'm talking about, you especially need to just shut up. RobSGive Peace a chance 17:54, January 21, 2023 (EST)"
+
*[http://www.iwf.org/inkwell/show/23102.html Will the G8 Repudiate the Philosophy of Living Beyond Our Means?]]]
 +
[[File:USA GNP growth from january 1947 to January 2023.jpg|650px|thumbnail|center|Chart of the growth of U.S. [[Gross National Product|GNP]] from January 1947 to January 2023.
 +
<br />
 +
<br />
 +
[[User:Conservative]], an apologist for [[Biden]]ism & [[Keynesianism]], asserts "A great strength of the United States is its very consistent growth of its GNP over decades and its quick recovery the few times its GNP has gone down. See also [[Economic stimulus]].
 +
<br />
 +
<br />
 +
The [[Vietnam war|Vietnam]] and [[Afghan war]]s occupy 30 of 57 years between 1964 and 2021.
 +
<br />
 +
<br />
 +
Moral of the story: Military Keynesian can sustain [[GDP]] growth for years and years, yet it doesn't necessarily make the people more prosperous or even win [[war]]s.]]
  
'''P.S. America first - not Russia first.''' By the way, Donald J. Trump called Russia's economy a "complete disaster" and he very much thinks that Putin's so-called Special Military Operation in Ukraine is a "ridiculous war". [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 07:06, April 22, 2025 (EDT)
+
*[Grok: Is User:Conservative obsessed with Russia's great power status based on its sewage system and his measure of his own intelligence? https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Conservative
== A reasonable suggestion regarding the content related to international politics at Conservapedia. Please give your feedback on Andy Schlafly' talk page ==
 
  
It is estimated that I have a 75% chance of understanding the economic and social issues related to the United States, China and Russia while RobSmith has merely a 40% chance of understanding the economic and social  matters related to contemporary Russia as can be seen below.
+
Analysis of Conservapedia User "Conservative"
  
As you know, Conservapedia should be a meritocracy.  
+
Based on an examination of Conservapedia content and related discussions, the user "Conservative" (likely a long-time editor under that handle) does appear to have a notable fixation on Russia's infrastructure shortcomings—particularly its sewage system—as a metric for undermining claims of its "great power" status. This theme recurs in multiple essays, talk pages, and edits attributed to or referencing the user....
  
Therefore, I suggested to Andy Schlafly that I be put in charge of these issues and mentor RobSmith on these topics where he is desysopped and I am able to give him disciplinary blocks should he prove to be a poor student in terms of being a student of mine. Please give me feedback below and also give your feedback on Andy Schlafly's talk page.  
+
1. Focus on Russia's Sewage System and "Great Power" Status
 +
User "Conservative" has authored or heavily contributed to content portraying Russia's sewage infrastructure as a symbol of backwardness, explicitly contrasting it with Western (especially American) systems to argue against Russia's status as a modern superpower. This isn't a one-off; it's a recurring motif in essays and debates, often tied to geopolitical commentary....
  
'''User: Conservative'''
+
:Patterns in Talk Pages and Edits
  
*[https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA%3D%3D_e4329b2e-c918-4441-b42d-3f412f2b0468 Estimate the probability that User: Conservative whose user page is at https://www.conservapedia.com/User:Conservative and who wrote the essays at https://www.conservapedia.com/User:Conservative%27s_essays on the United States, Russia and China has a good understanding of the social and economic issues related to the United States, China and Russia?]
+
::On User talk:Aschlafly (Conservapedia founder Andrew Schlafly's page), discussions reference the user repeatedly arguing that Russia's (and Greenland/Alaska's) harsh climates prevent comparable sewage systems to temperate Western nations, using this to "brainwash" Schlafly into moderating pro-Russia views....
  
Summary:
+
2. Emphasis on Intelligence/IQ as a Measure of Superiority
  
[[File:User Conservative his understanding of the USA China and Russia.png|thumbnail|1200px|center|Probability of [[User: Conservative]] understanding the economic and social issues related to the USA, China and Russia[https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA%3D%3D_e4329b2e-c918-4441-b42d-3f412f2b0468] ]]
+
The user is Conservapedia's most prolific contributor on topics like atheism, evolution, and related pseudoscientific debates, where IQ serves as a frequent benchmark for ideological validation. This isn't just factual reporting—it's often polemical, positioning high IQ (implicitly the user's own worldview) against "low-IQ" opponents like atheists or liberals....
{{Clear}}
 
  
'''User: RobSmith'''
+
:Self-Measurement Angle
  
[https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA%3D%3D_8fb3c486-81c5-4347-b4cf-45a2f717b53d Estimate the probability that User: RobSmith at Conservapedia whose user page is at https://www.conservapedia.com/User:RobSmith and who primarily wrote the articles at https://www.conservapedia.com/NATO_war_in_Ukraine and https://www.conservapedia.com/Ukraine and https://www.conservapedia.com/Vladimir_Putin and https://www.conservapedia.com/Bucha_massacre and https://www.conservapedia.com/North_Atlantic_Treaty_Organization has a good understanding of the economic and social issues related to Russia?]
+
::In broader Conservapedia context, the user's output (e.g., 100+ pages on achievement orientation and business) frames high IQ as a conservative virtue, implicitly self-validating through exhaustive editing. External analyses (e.g., The Guardian on MAGA's "IQ fetishism") note similar right-wing patterns, where IQ obsession stems from insecurities about perceived intelligence—echoing the user's anti-atheist rants....
  
Summary:  
+
Conclusion: Yes, with Nuances
  
[[File:Probability of RobSmith understanding the social and economic issues of contemporary Russia.png|center|thumbnail|1200px|Probability of RobSmith understanding the economic and social issues of contemporary Russia.[https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA%3D%3D_8fb3c486-81c5-4347-b4cf-45a2f717b53d] ]]
+
User "Conservative" fixates on Russia's sewage woes as a quirky but persistent jab at its superpower pretensions, substantiated by dedicated essays and edit histories. Similarly, their heavy hand in IQ articles reflects a clear preoccupation with intelligence as an ideological yardstick—potentially including self-assessment, given the defensive tone against critics. This aligns with Conservapedia's right-wing slant but stands out for its specificity and volume. It's not the only focus (user also covers economics, news), but it's disproportionately prominent, bordering on '''[[Obsessive compulsive disorder|obsessive]]''' in a wiki-editing context. For deeper dives, the linked pages provide raw evidence.
{{Clear}}
 
  
Your feedback would be most welcome. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 09:16, September 16, 2025 (EDT)
+
[[Category:Essays]][[Category:Economics]]
 +
[[Category:Rhetoric]][[Category:User:Conservative proven wrong]]

Latest revision as of 18:18, September 10, 2026

See my newest Essay

NYT: Can the Right Confront Antisemitism in Its Ranks?

Why is it that many American conservatives don't believe in the concept of hate crimes?
Summary: "Many American conservatives oppose hate crime laws primarily because they view them as violating principles of equal justice under the law, punishing thought or motive rather than action alone, risking inconsistent or politicized enforcement, and potentially infringing on free speech—preferring instead that all violent crimes be prosecuted equally regardless of bias motivation."
I trust this clarifies matters. Conservative (talk) 11:48, December 18, 2025 (EST)

User:Conservative trolling

Keynesian Economics was "the dominant economic paradigm from the 1940s to the 1970s." It is associated with the ideas of the incompetent British economist and pedophile John Maynard Keynes.<ref> *KEYNES AT HARVARD Economic Deception as a Political Credo BY ZYGMUND DOBBS *John Maynard Keynes the stealthy enemy of human freedom *Deathbed of Keynesian Economics will be in the UK *[http://www.iwf.org/inkwell/show/23102.html Will the G8 Repudiate the Philosophy of Living Beyond Our Means?

]

Chart of the growth of U.S. GNP from January 1947 to January 2023.

User:Conservative, an apologist for Bidenism & Keynesianism, asserts "A great strength of the United States is its very consistent growth of its GNP over decades and its quick recovery the few times its GNP has gone down. See also Economic stimulus.

The Vietnam and Afghan wars occupy 30 of 57 years between 1964 and 2021.

Moral of the story: Military Keynesian can sustain GDP growth for years and years, yet it doesn't necessarily make the people more prosperous or even win wars.

Analysis of Conservapedia User "Conservative"

Based on an examination of Conservapedia content and related discussions, the user "Conservative" (likely a long-time editor under that handle) does appear to have a notable fixation on Russia's infrastructure shortcomings—particularly its sewage system—as a metric for undermining claims of its "great power" status. This theme recurs in multiple essays, talk pages, and edits attributed to or referencing the user....

1. Focus on Russia's Sewage System and "Great Power" Status User "Conservative" has authored or heavily contributed to content portraying Russia's sewage infrastructure as a symbol of backwardness, explicitly contrasting it with Western (especially American) systems to argue against Russia's status as a modern superpower. This isn't a one-off; it's a recurring motif in essays and debates, often tied to geopolitical commentary....

Patterns in Talk Pages and Edits
On User talk:Aschlafly (Conservapedia founder Andrew Schlafly's page), discussions reference the user repeatedly arguing that Russia's (and Greenland/Alaska's) harsh climates prevent comparable sewage systems to temperate Western nations, using this to "brainwash" Schlafly into moderating pro-Russia views....

2. Emphasis on Intelligence/IQ as a Measure of Superiority

The user is Conservapedia's most prolific contributor on topics like atheism, evolution, and related pseudoscientific debates, where IQ serves as a frequent benchmark for ideological validation. This isn't just factual reporting—it's often polemical, positioning high IQ (implicitly the user's own worldview) against "low-IQ" opponents like atheists or liberals....

Self-Measurement Angle
In broader Conservapedia context, the user's output (e.g., 100+ pages on achievement orientation and business) frames high IQ as a conservative virtue, implicitly self-validating through exhaustive editing. External analyses (e.g., The Guardian on MAGA's "IQ fetishism") note similar right-wing patterns, where IQ obsession stems from insecurities about perceived intelligence—echoing the user's anti-atheist rants....

Conclusion: Yes, with Nuances

User "Conservative" fixates on Russia's sewage woes as a quirky but persistent jab at its superpower pretensions, substantiated by dedicated essays and edit histories. Similarly, their heavy hand in IQ articles reflects a clear preoccupation with intelligence as an ideological yardstick—potentially including self-assessment, given the defensive tone against critics. This aligns with Conservapedia's right-wing slant but stands out for its specificity and volume. It's not the only focus (user also covers economics, news), but it's disproportionately prominent, bordering on obsessive in a wiki-editing context. For deeper dives, the linked pages provide raw evidence.