Difference between revisions of "Liberal logic"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(saying Fox News has liberal bias)
(Elaborating)
Line 16: Line 16:
 
# [[Hollywood]] promotion of [[abortion]] is welcomed, but views of Hollywood actresses towards their own children are concealed
 
# [[Hollywood]] promotion of [[abortion]] is welcomed, but views of Hollywood actresses towards their own children are concealed
 
# insisting that an [[atheistic]] culture cannot harm anyone, but also insisting that classroom prayer can cause harm
 
# insisting that an [[atheistic]] culture cannot harm anyone, but also insisting that classroom prayer can cause harm
# carrying an unborn child to birth reduces risk of breast cancer, but choosing [[abortion]] rather than childbirth somehow does not increase the relative risk
+
# carrying an unborn child to birth reduces risk of breast cancer, but choosing [[abortion]] rather than childbirth somehow does not increase the relative risk. Or they will insist that [[abstinence]] also increases the risk of breast cancer.
 
# requesting increased spending by [[government]] to reduce poverty, which actually poverty is increased by the dependency
 
# requesting increased spending by [[government]] to reduce poverty, which actually poverty is increased by the dependency
 
# insisting on "tolerance" for anything that is anti-[[Christian]], while censorship for anything is [[Christian]]
 
# insisting on "tolerance" for anything that is anti-[[Christian]], while censorship for anything is [[Christian]]

Revision as of 00:11, May 4, 2008

Liberal logic is an argument by a liberal that is deceptively attractive to some, but is actually nonsensical. Here are some examples:

  1. Big media outlets are notorious for being firmly entrenched in liberal bias. Fox News is one of the biggest media outlets in the world. Fox News must have liberal bias.
  2. frequent reliance on circular reasoning, as in demanding censorship of intelligent design while simultaneously citing the resulting silence as proof against it[1]
  3. often a liberal responds to a logical comment or question with an (illogical) expression of personal like or dislike, as in "but I like it!"
  4. claim that switching from heterosexual to homosexual is customary, but switching back is somehow impossible
  5. criticize Christians for literal interpretations of Genesis, but then insist on even more literal interpretations when it suits the liberal ideology[2]
  6. no matter what happens in the weather, global warming caused it
  7. belief that a correlation and/or causation (e.g., between atheism and suicide) can be disproved by a counterexample (e.g., one atheist who remained sane)
  8. Americans should "move on" past the misconduct of Bill Clinton and Ted Kennedy, but should dig up as much old dirt as possible about John McCain
  9. if [highly implausible assumption like "embryonic stem cell research will find the cure for paralysis"], then would you support it (without any consideration of alternatives)?
  10. Barack Obama on Afghanistan: with fewer soldiers, we didn't have enough ammo and humvees![3]
  11. personal experience dictates personal views, rather than rising above bad and/or unusual experiences and basing one's views on logic
  12. never admit shame for liberal behavior, but often tell others they should be ashamed of themselves
  13. free speech for anything and everything ... except the conservative truth, and religion.
  14. Hollywood promotion of abortion is welcomed, but views of Hollywood actresses towards their own children are concealed
  15. insisting that an atheistic culture cannot harm anyone, but also insisting that classroom prayer can cause harm
  16. carrying an unborn child to birth reduces risk of breast cancer, but choosing abortion rather than childbirth somehow does not increase the relative risk. Or they will insist that abstinence also increases the risk of breast cancer.
  17. requesting increased spending by government to reduce poverty, which actually poverty is increased by the dependency
  18. insisting on "tolerance" for anything that is anti-Christian, while censorship for anything is Christian
  19. insisting that teaching abstinence does not reduce premarital sex and associated disease
  20. denying that widespread ownership of guns, largely defensive weapons, can reduce crime
  21. insisting that increasing taxes must increase government revenue, when often people just work less and revenues then decline
  22. Even though the Supreme Court overrules precedents every year by 5-4 votes, Roe v. Wade cannot be overruled, or can only be overruled if it is a unanimous 9-0 vote (this argument tries to make irreversible law out of the dicta in a weak majority opinion in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, even though the very creation of that "secret opinion" was procured by liberal deceit.)[4]
  23. The pronoun "he" has been used to include men and women collectively for centuries, but liberals find that illogical today, this does not mean to replace the word she on the article for Hillary Clinton with he


(add to list)

See also

References

  1. See, e.g., Richard Sternberg.
  2. For example, liberals here insist that homeschooling can only mean being taught while in someone's own home. Liberals also often insist that the Bible literally prohibits judging anything.
  3. [1]
  4. See Jeffrey Toobin's The Nine.