Difference between revisions of "Douglas Jesseph"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 9: Line 9:
 
==External Links==
 
==External Links==
 
*[http://philosophy.usf.edu/faculty/djesseph/ Dr. Douglas Jesseph's webpage at the University of South Florida]
 
*[http://philosophy.usf.edu/faculty/djesseph/ Dr. Douglas Jesseph's webpage at the University of South Florida]
 +
*[http://philosophy.usf.edu/faculty/data/djesseph_cv.pdf Online Resume of Dr. Douglas Jesseph]
 
*[http://www.leaderu.com/offices/billcraig/docs/jesseph-craig0.html A transcript of the oral debate which was held in 1996 at North Carolina State University between atheist philosopher Dr. Douglas Jesseph and Christian philosopher William Lane Craig]
 
*[http://www.leaderu.com/offices/billcraig/docs/jesseph-craig0.html A transcript of the oral debate which was held in 1996 at North Carolina State University between atheist philosopher Dr. Douglas Jesseph and Christian philosopher William Lane Craig]
  

Revision as of 06:02, November 4, 2010

Dr. Douglas Jesseph is a professor of philosophy at the University of South Florida. Douglas Jesseph received his Ph.D. in Philosophy from Princeton University in 1987, after gaining a B.A. Mathematics and Philosophy from Macalester College in 1981.[1]

Concerning atheism, Dr. Douglas Jesseph has been described as "the most impressive debater to date" by Jeffery Jay Lowder, a founder of the pro-atheism website Internet Infidels.[2] However, in a 1996 debate with William Lane Craig, Douglas Jesseph claimed that the origin of life had a detailed atheistic explanation(s).[3] This confidence was not shared by the highly respected origin of life researcher Stanley Miller. Indeed, in 1996, John Horgan wrote that "Miller seemed unimpressed with any of the current proposals on the origin of life, referring to them as “nonsense” or “paper chemistry.”"[4] In a 1996 edition of Scientific American, Horgan went on to say: "The origin of life is a science writer's dream. It abounds with exotic scientists and exotic theories, which are never entirely abandoned or accepted, but merely go in and out of fashion."[5]

See also

External Links

Notes