Conservapedia

Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia:User complaints"

m (Protected "Conservapedia:User complaints": Edit warring ([Edit=Administrators only] (expires 04:16, October 11, 2023 (UTC)) [Move=Administrators only] (expires 04:16, October 11, 2023 (UTC))))
 
(244 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
:''This is the place for Conservapedia users to make complaints about other Conservapedia editor's actions, attitude, civility, or ideological leanings Please re-read [[Conservapedia:Guidelines#Civility]] and [[Conservapedia:Editing etiquette]] before posting here. In this mainspace, and only this mainspace, is the basic civility rule of not posting Editor usernames in subheadings waived for the purpose of soliciting other members of the Community to comment or gang up on an Editor. All other civility rules and etiquette guidelines, however, are not waived. Please act accordingly.''
 
:''This is the place for Conservapedia users to make complaints about other Conservapedia editor's actions, attitude, civility, or ideological leanings Please re-read [[Conservapedia:Guidelines#Civility]] and [[Conservapedia:Editing etiquette]] before posting here. In this mainspace, and only this mainspace, is the basic civility rule of not posting Editor usernames in subheadings waived for the purpose of soliciting other members of the Community to comment or gang up on an Editor. All other civility rules and etiquette guidelines, however, are not waived. Please act accordingly.''
 +
 +
:''For complaints against Admin, see [[Conservapedia:Sysop complaint documentation]]. Please do not be redundant and spam complaints on multiple pages across Conservapedia.''
  
 
[[Conservapedia:User complaints/Archives]]
 
[[Conservapedia:User complaints/Archives]]
  
−
==Taking a page from the boss's book==
+
__TOC__
−
Well, now we have another list of lies with no evidence to back it up, such as the site's viewership going down since I returned; Robbybaby wants to blame it on me, but I'm counting all the remaining editors - and there are just a handful of them - and I can rightly blame Robbybaby for driving them all away.  Nobody wants to work with a jerk.
+
 
 +
==User:Conservative==
 +
===Locus of dispute===
 +
<big><big>'''[[User:Conservative]] posted in [[Conservapedia]]:'''</big></big>
 +
{{Cquote|RobS becoming a pawn and a "useful idiot" of an atheist website
 +
 
 +
<big><big>'''RobS is now spouting to some atheists that I supposedly stated something in a communication with him about one of my articles. It wasn't very positive.{{citation needed}} Of course, I have no trust in his Personal remark removed concerning our communication. Please be very careful when communicating with RobS. <big>Do not trust him.</big>{{citation needed}} Based on this discussion with some atheists who have shown malevolence towards this website, I think RobS has little reluctance to try to Personal remark removed.'''
 +
 
 +
'''I think RobS is at heart an Personal remark removed who thinks he has great influence over members of an atheist website. The truth is that if they don't respect God, he is kidding himself if he thinks they respect him. Although he did do a service in unblocking all of those IPs and I think clarifying block policy and not having an overly aggressive block policy is good, I do think now that RobS is now morphing into what the Soviets call "a useful idiot" and he is in the process of becoming a pawn of an atheist website.
 +
 
 +
'''If he continues down his present path, I see him losing his Admin rights. Conservative 17:16, 27 July 2011'''</big> (EDT)</big>}}
 +
 
 +
<big><big>'''[[User:Conservative]] also posted:'''</big></big>
 +
{{Cquote|<big><big>'''RobS just tried to bring up me blocking user BobSherman again via my talk page. You, myself and Karajou believes this person is a parodist. <big>RobS knows BobSherman lied at our wiki.</big>{{citation needed}} There is no pressing need to keep rehashing the blocking of a parodist liar....Conservative 05:25, 26 July 2011 (EDT)'''</big></big>}}
 +
I had NEVER heard of "Bob Sherman" until he contacted me, per [[Conservapedia:Administrator's Guide]], to look into what he alleged was an unfair blocking. '''I exercised my duties as an Admin.'''  I could not find any reasonable violation. I did find a pattern and habit of deletions of talk pages. When I approached [[User:Conservapedia]] for an explanation of Bob Sherman's blocking, he responded with a very public series of [[personal attacks]] against a fellow Admin, [https://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Community_Portal/archive2#RobS_becoming_a_pawn_and_a_.22useful_idiot.22_of_an_atheist_website] again, in violation of standing [[Conservapedia]] [[policy]].
 +
 
 +
My failure to defend myself and respond to the [[personal attacks]] led to my de-sysopping, setting an extremely destructive precedent [[Conservapedia]] refuses to deal with. It destroyed [[Conservapedia]] as a [[meritocracy]], opening the floodgate of allowing [[personal attacks]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Recovering Republican]]</sup> 18:00, December 26, 2025 (EST)
 +
 
 +
:What we have here, besides the outright violations of [[civility]] and [[personal attacks]], violation of the [[Conservapedia: Administrator's Guide]] which remain unchanged since 2011, is an unending series of [[lies]] and [[gossip]] which only have festered and become worse. [[User:Conservative]] takes encouragement from ownership because of the failure to address these [[policy]] concerns and abuses. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Recovering Republican]]</sup> 18:26, December 26, 2025 (EST)
 +
 
 +
{{Cquote|<big>'''RobS appears to know that RobertSherman lied at CP... Conservative 11:45, 26 July 2011 (EDT)'''</big>}}
 +
:I do not believe a shred of evidence exists anywhere, in Conservapedia (even if pages are undeleted) or in Sysop email lists that I knew of, ever had any interaction with, or had discussions with other editors about User:BobSherman.
 +
 
 +
:[[User:Conservative]] not only [[lied]] & [[gossip]]ed, he invented it out of butthole. And there is a [[motivation]] for it: A Ratwikian asked me on my talk page at RW weeks earlier if I thought "Ken was [[mentally ill]]", which I NEVER RESPONDED TO, anywhere, not until AFTER I was de-sysopped, and then becoming convinced that the man was deranged.
 +
 
 +
:I have been a completely innocent victim, caught up in [[User:Conservative]]'s [[psychotic]] delusions for 14 years, which I studiously avoided for the first four years of [[Conservapedia]]'s existence after he privately told me he prayed to [[God]] that other members of his [[church]] would be kicked out. That absolutely, totally defies my understanding of [[Christian]] scripture: "who desires all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth" - 1 Tim 2:4 [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Recovering Republican]]</sup> 21:55, December 26, 2025 (EST)
 +
 
 +
===User:Conservative has brought disrepute on Conservapedia===
 +
 
 +
[[User:Conservative]] ([https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Conservative contibs]) has brought ill-repute upon the [[Conservapedia]] community, refuses to review his articles for questionable wording or content, and apologize to the community.
 +
 
 +
[[File:Hate crime indictment Nov 16 2021.PNG]]
 +
 
 +
===Admitted troll===
 +
email to Sysop group list after User:Aschlalfy, owner of the website, requests civility and ending personal attacks:
 +
{{quotebox-float|From: Mark Miller <>
 +
Date: Sat, Apr 5, 2025 at 11:16 PM
 +
Subject: re: backhanded compliment and I am still alive
 +
To: Andrew Schlafly [redacted], Brian MacDonald>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
Andy,
 +
 
 +
In the popular movie Diehard, the estranged wife Holly Gennaro says of the protagonist John McClane:
 +
 
 +
"He's still alive. Only John can drive somebody that crazy."
 +
 
 +
Three websites appeared in the public eye '''due to <u>my skill of being able to drive people crazy</u> by fully engaging their emotions, logical mind and conscience:''' Conservapedia (My homosexuality, evolution and atheism content really got under some liberals' skin) and the websites Rationalwiki  and Liberalpedia which were reactions to Conservapedia.
 +
 
 +
And now the poor soul RobSmith is stark raving mad and totally obsessed with me because of my content related to the USA, Russia, China and international politics.
 +
 
 +
In a way, it is a backhanded compliment that RobSmith is totally obsessed with me.  It shows my ability to create content that fully engages the pathos, logos and ethos (emotions, logic and morality) of people.
 +
 
 +
One of the reasons that I know I am alive is RobSmith's complete and utter obsession with me. 😄
 +
 
 +
Sincerely,
 +
 
 +
User: Conservative}}
 +
''Em added''.
 +
::You are acknowledging that one of the reasons that you are obsessed with me is that I have used logic (Logos) to cause you to be obsessed with me. I marshalled plenty of logic/facts to support my arguments related to the topics of USA/China/Russia and international politics.
 +
 
 +
::Also, for a while, I will not be collecting facts related to these topics as I will be taking a lengthy sabbatical on these particular topics. Instead, I am going to focus my interests on the interesting topics of Christianity/religion/marketing/advertising/promotion/copy writing/sales/personal development/peak performance.
 +
 
 +
::So I suggest you temper your colossal obsession with me and devote it to more worthwhile pursuits. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 06:39, April 7, 2025 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
:::Yah, we've heard these promises by you to quit [[trolling]] over extended sabbaticals that usually last about 48 hours. [https://www.bing.com/search?q=A+man+is+known+by+his+word+that+he+keeps&gs_lcrp=EgRlZGdlKgYIABBFGDkyBggAEEUYOTIGCAEQRRhAqAIAsAIA&FORM=ANCMS9&adppc=EDGEBRV&PC=EDGEBRV A man is known by his word that he keeps.] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 06:48, April 7, 2025 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
:::P.S. Again, by your own words, you seem to have [[MSM]] news sources & [[globalist]] [[think tank]]s confused with "[[fact]]s" - which are the sources for all your [[trolling]] [[spam]], not "[[logic]]" or reasoned debate & discussion. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 07:24, April 7, 2025 (EDT)
  
−
So, since he is a jerk, as well as an arrogant, narcissistic little bully, the best way to deal with such an individual is right out of Andy's playbook, which is to ignore him.  Don't even talk to him, don't respond to him, don't even give him the time of day. Just let him whine, scream, pout, whatever, because there's absolutely nothing he can do about it. And he cannot block you for not talking to him, can he?  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] ([[User talk:Karajou|talk]]) 18:53, October 7, 2023 (EDT)
+
::::You are upset that my proverbial SAMs of talking about how bad the Russian/Chinese economies are and how bad their demographics are have taken down your proverbial Sukhoi Su-57.😄 You are a very sore loser. 😄
  
−
:Yeah, man. If no-one acknowledges the bonkers guff he regularly inserts into articles and MPR, then that ... means it isn't there and the rest of the world can't see it either! This will definitely work. No notes. [[User:ConwayIII|ConwayIII]] ([[User talk:ConwayIII|talk]]) 21:03, October 7, 2023 (EDT)
+
::::As much as I hate to say it, I hereby declare total victory for truth, justice and the American way. USA! USA! USA! Olé! Olé! Olé! [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:39, May 27, 2025 (EDT)
  
−
==Hope you're proud of yourself now==
+
:::::This is not a content dispute. It is about behavior:
−
'''Oct 1, 2023'''
+
:::::*[[spamming]]
 +
:::::*[[trolling]]
 +
:::::*targeting individual editors for [[harassment]].
  
−
[[File:Hypestat 10-1-23.PNG]]
+
:::::[[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 12:56, May 27, 2025 (EDT)
  
−
'''Oct. 2, 2023''' Karajou reactivated.
+
===Mearsheimer===
 +
:In the "[[John Joseph Mearsheimer]]" article - which [[User:Conservative]] created, contains this information:
 +
{{quotebox-float|Mearsheimer is in the [[Myrotvorets]] (English: Peacemaker) database, usually known as the [[Ukrainian Nazi]] kill list, which is an online database of what its owner, '''[[Anton Gerashchenko]]''', declares as “enemies of [[Ukraine]],” containing personal doxxing information and addresses.<ref>[https://mronline.org/2022/09/21/ukrainian-hit-list-publishes-names-and-addresses-of-alleged-russian-propagandists/ Ukrainian “Hit list” Publishes names and addresses of alleged “Russian propagandists:” Turns out to be based not in Ukraine but in Langley VA where CIA headquarters is located], By Jeremy Kuzmarov (Posted Sep 21, 2022). mronline.org</ref>  The kill list is maintained by Gerashchenko, a member of the Ukrainian parliament ([[Rada]]) and deputy minister of the Interior. Its servers are located in [[Brussels, Belgium]] and operated by [[NATO]] and the [[CIA]]. For enforcement of the kill list, the Ukrainian [[Teroborona]], [[SBU]], and Neo-Nazi [[Azov Battalion]] are organizations within the Ukrainian Ministry of Interior, and not in the Ministry of Defense.}}
  
−
'''Oct 6, 2023.'''
+
:The number of times [[User:Conservative]] inhibited other user's productive editing with [[spam]] misquotes about Mearsheimer, [[harassment]], & [[trolling]] can be [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:WhatLinksHere/John_Mearsheimer&limit=100 deduced from here.]
  
−
[[File:10-06-23.PNG]]
+
===Nazi sourcing & spam===
  
−
[[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 21:12, October 7, 2023 (EDT)
+
:Of late, [[User:Conservative]] has been spamming & [[edit war]]ring over '''[[Talk:Main_Page/Archive_index/275#A_Nazi_created_the_Nazi_kill_list|Talk:Main_Page#A_Nazi_created_the_Nazi_kill_list]]''' on several pages he has posted redundant [[spam]] into (see '''[https://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Aschlafly/Archives/archive74#Wow._Neo-nazi_sourcing_in_Conservapedia]''' for instance). To any normal person or jury of his peers, this should be abundant evidence [[User:Conservative]] is an uncooperative editor and [[troll]].
  
−
==Motion of no confidence==
+
[[File:Gerashchenko 2.PNG|center|400px|thumb|Deputy Ukrainian Interior Minister and Advisor to President Zelensky '''[[Anton Gerashchenko]]''' is the founder and curator of the [[Ukrainian nazi kill list]]. Being that private handgun ownership is illegal in [[Ukraine]], the defiant outlaw pose this government official strikes with his finger on the trigger is particularly intimidating to [[citizen]]s.]]
−
I am initiating a [[No confidence vote|vote of no confidence]] in [[User:RobSmith]]. Over the past few months, I have grown increasingly distressed with the state of Conservapedia. I would like to contribute good-quality conservative content, but I have not because of the shadow RobSmith casts over the encyclopedia. A by no means exhaustive list of grievances:
 
−
*He is the king of "rules for thee, but not for me". He often complains about people "peeing all over the carpet" by joining in discussions they were not a part of. And yet he finds the need to respond to every thread over at [[User talk:Aschlafly]], adding his "two cents".
 
−
*He claims that anything critical of Russia or Putin is [[Russophobic]]
 
−
*He believes that he is responsible for the decrease in vandalism over the past few months, when anyone with a functioning brain would realize it is because creating new accounts is disabled
 
−
*He believes that page protection is the first tool against vandalism. No. Blocks are used when the problem is the user, page protection is used when the problem is the page. Protecting pages because of one user just prevents [[good faith]] contributions to the page by other users.
 
−
*His views on content are wildly off-base with those of the general readership of CP. See: [[Conservapedia:AFD Essay:Russian war crimes in Ukraine]]
 
−
*He views any popular challenge to his authority as a [[mobocracy]], when it is simply an exercise in the taking the views of the [[best of the public]]
 
−
*He needs to collaborate with ''everyone'', not just members of [[Team CP]]. There was no [[elitist]] gang of editors until RobSmith started one.
 
−
The undersigned users endorse this statement and believe RobSmith needs to be de-sysoped for the good of Conservapedia, and humbly request Andy remove his admin rights:
 
−
===Endorsements===
 
−
#The problem is RobSmith, not the supposedly "Russophobic" contributors he keeps attacking. [[User:MayGodBless|MayGodBless]] ([[User talk:MayGodBless|talk]]) 20:34, October 9, 2023 (EDT)
 
−
#:You're lucky this isn't the good old days; Karajou and User:Conservative would have just blocked you and deleted everything by now. Don't I get credit for stopping that? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 21:08, October 9, 2023 (EDT)
 
−
#::How did *you* stop that? [[User:MayGodBless|MayGodBless]] ([[User talk:MayGodBless|talk]]) 21:11, October 9, 2023 (EDT)
 
−
#:::Have you been blocked and this page deleted for initiating this vote? You know darn well Karajou and Cons would have booted your butt in 5 mins. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 21:18, October 9, 2023 (EDT)
 
−
#::::I actually don't, given that I am a fairly new editor. And If I had initiated something like this without good cause, I would deserve to be blocked.
 
−
#::::But you have not answered my main point: how did the actions of RobSmith change the dynamic at CP? [[User:MayGodBless|MayGodBless]] ([[User talk:MayGodBless|talk]]) 22:52, October 9, 2023 (EDT)
 
−
#::::::Read some of the items you enumerated above. You're just lucky you're still here, cause Karajou and User:Cons would have deleted any trace you ever existed if you tried anything like this with them. Heck, I'm the guy who created this place for people to come and air their grievances without fear of getting blocked. 23:07, October 9, 2023 (EDT) {{unsigned|RobSmith}}
 
−
#:::::::Gorbachev opened up the USSR and it led to criticism of the system. And again, you have not addressed my point: what action(s) taken by you are preventing Karajou and/or Conservative from blocking me for criticising you? And know this: I am not trying to attack you. Your heart is in the right place. I am merely expressing the viewpoint that you need to be a regular editor while you learn how to be a net-positive to this wiki. [[User:MayGodBless|MayGodBless]] ([[User talk:MayGodBless|talk]]) 23:27, October 9, 2023 (EDT)
 
−
#::::::::I'm  not getting into our internal politics. Why haven't you taken the pledge to edit in [[good faith]]? All you've done here is cite a bunch of second and third hand hearsay, and don't have a personnel grievance yourself. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 23:39, October 9, 2023 (EDT)
 
−
#::::::::What do you find objectional about this language, and what would you propose to improve it:
 
−
{{quotebox-float|We the undersigned editors at '''Team CP''' pledge to work cooperatively with other signees as a cooperative editor to produce content for [[Conservapedia]] under the [[Conservapedia:Commandments]] and [[Conservapedia:Guidelines]]. We pledge to treat other editors with dignity and respect, and not engage in ceaseless acts of incivility, [[edit war]]ring, and [[trolling]], etc. We pledge to make, good, well researched content for Conservapedia readers. We pledge to work together as cooperative editors, and not engage in unnecessary, senseless trivial disputes, personality clashes, carry grudges, and to work for a spirit of cooperation among editors.}}
 
−
#::::::::: [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 23:42, October 9, 2023 (EDT)
 
−
#::::::::::My personal grievance is it is destroying this website. And I ask that you withdraw your comment "Don't I get credit for stopping that?" if you are unwilling or unable to back it up with sources. And I strongly object to the line "We the undersigned editors at '''Team CP''' pledge to work cooperatively ''with other signees''" (bold in original, italics mine). At a wiki, you work cooperatively with ''everyone'', even if they don't particularly want to work cooperatively with you. That is a basic tenant of editing that anyone with SkipCaptcha should know, let alone an admin. I would also consider asking Andy why he has not signed your pledge if you want to know why people have not signed it. [[User:MayGodBless|MayGodBless]] ([[User talk:MayGodBless|talk]]) 23:53, October 9, 2023 (EDT)
 
−
#::::::::::::I don't need to, cause I did. I don't block on sight editors such as yourself who engage in the type of conduct you are engaging in right now - that's one of my reforms. You have no personnel grievance, yet are soliciting a conspiracy against another editor. That's [[bad faith editing]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 23:59, October 9, 2023 (EDT)
 
−
#:::::::::::::So upholding a basic sense of decency to allow constructive criticism is a "reform" you want credit for? Inflation is coming down, but that doesn't mean we should re-elect Joe Biden. And I absolutely have a personal grievance: I want CP to thrive. You are acting as an impediment to that. And if you understood what the phrase "good faith" means, you would know it is a belief that you are doing good ''regardless of if you are successful or not''. I believe I am being successful, but even if I am not, it is still [[good faith]] editing ''because I believe I am''. Something any editor should know. [[User:MayGodBless|MayGodBless]] ([[User talk:MayGodBless|talk]]) 00:04, October 10, 2023 (EDT)
 
−
#:::::::::::::The fact you just redirected [[bad faith editing]] to an entry of inappropriate behaviour says a lot. Bad faith editing is about ''faith''. You might be trying to accuse me of ''disruptive'' editing? [[User:MayGodBless|MayGodBless]] ([[User talk:MayGodBless|talk]]) 00:07, October 10, 2023 (EDT)
 
−
#::::::::::::::No, the Etiquette section still needs rounding out, but it has the link to the specific section you are in violation of right now. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 00:12, October 10, 2023 (EDT)
 
−
#::::::::::::::See, we've had problems at this website in the past that too often were met with the sledgehammer by Karajou and User:Conservative. You have no discernible complaint, as far as I can tell. Specifically mentioned in the Guidelines: '''Flaming or flame wars; posting user disputes over multiple pages.''' And you don't even have a personnel dispute or grievance. As an Admin, I make a judgement call to call that "[[trolling]]". Now I can issue a warning, or a suggestion. I'll begin with a suggestion: My suggestion is you stop trolling, me, other users, and this website.  [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 00:19, October 10, 2023 (EDT)
 
−
#:::::::::::::::Let's go over this again. I believe I am helping CP => I am acting in good faith. By definition. [[User:MayGodBless|MayGodBless]] ([[User talk:MayGodBless|talk]]) 00:22, October 10, 2023 (EDT)
 
−
#::::::::::::::::Ok. You may believe that in your mind, and I'm not challenging that. As a 16-year senior veteran Administrator on this site, I see things quite differently; I see someone who is not familiar with our rules and guidelines, a wayward child as it were, who needs to be guided back to the right path. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 00:32, October 10, 2023 (EDT)
 
−
#:::::::::::::::::Good. We can agree that I "believe that in [my] mind". Which means that your assertion that I am partaking in "bad faith editing" is patently false and a [[personal attack]]. [[User:MayGodBless|MayGodBless]] ([[User talk:MayGodBless|talk]]) 00:50, October 10, 2023 (EDT)
 
−
#::::::::::::::::::No it doesn't it. It means I, in good faith, respect your assessment of your own conduct in violation of our Guidelines as being in good faith. And it also means by my Adminship, I believe you are in error, and my job is to steer you back to a proper course. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 00:55, October 10, 2023 (EDT)
 
−
#:(outdenting) RobSmith, I thought we had an agreement. I am acting in good faith, yes? Which means that I am not partaking in bad faith editing. Pretty simple logic. What part of that do you need me to explain again? [[User:MayGodBless|MayGodBless]] ([[User talk:MayGodBless|talk]]) 00:58, October 10, 2023 (EDT)
 
−
#:I would love it if you could persuade one (1) other person that your view is correct. I have already convinced two (2) people that you are in the wrong, which is more than have signed up for your [[Team CP]]. [[User:MayGodBless|MayGodBless]] ([[User talk:MayGodBless|talk]]) 00:59, October 10, 2023 (EDT)
 
−
#::I said, I believe and respected your belief that you were acting in good faith. I now believe, since you've been showed chapter and verse the type of editing that you engaged in - which there is no way to undo short of issuing several public retractions and apologies - can be considered trolling activity. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 01:02, October 10, 2023 (EDT)
 
−
#:::Do you believe [[trolling]] is the same thing as [[bad faith editing]]? Hint: they are not. [[User:MayGodBless|MayGodBless]] ([[User talk:MayGodBless|talk]]) 01:05, October 10, 2023 (EDT)
 
−
#::::That's a very good question. I'd be interested to sit back and hear you expound on the matter. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 01:08, October 10, 2023 (EDT)
 
−
#:::::I asked the question, oh wise administrator. Guide me; show me the light. Explain the difference between trolling and bad faith editing, please. I am, after all, a newbie and need to be guided by a powerful administrator who is respected such as yourself. [[User:MayGodBless|MayGodBless]] ([[User talk:MayGodBless|talk]]) 01:12, October 10, 2023 (EDT)
 
−
#::::::Oh, ok. Nevermind. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 01:21, October 10, 2023 (EDT)
 
−
#:::::::Are you incapable of answering that basic question? You don't get to hand-wave this away. '''What is the difference between bad faith editing and trolling'''? [[User:MayGodBless|MayGodBless]] ([[User talk:MayGodBless|talk]]) 07:40, October 10, 2023 (EDT)
 
−
#:Another complaint: RobSmith has reverted me with no comment when I remove unattributed quotes. See: [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Bucha_massacre&diff=1992526&oldid=1992463]. [[User:MayGodBless|MayGodBless]] ([[User talk:MayGodBless|talk]]) 11:00, October 10, 2023 (EDT)
 
−
#::He has now re-added the material, this time with a source. Just one problem: '''''the source does not support the given assertion'''''. That is an egregious violation of [[academic integrity]]. [[User:MayGodBless|MayGodBless]] ([[User talk:MayGodBless|talk]]) 11:06, October 10, 2023 (EDT)
 
−
[[File:Azov Nazis.PNG|right|300px|thumb|It's you're tree Frank. You're sitting in it. [https://youtu.be/FYi-JnGpxV8?t=57] ]]
 
−
#'''Agree with motion of no confidence.''' [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 20:45, October 9, 2023 (EDT)
 
−
#'''<b>Absolutely agreed without a doubt. Remove RobSmith's “Administrator” tag ASAP.</b>''' —[[User:LT|<code><span style="background:#FF8181">'''LT'''</span></code>]] '''''[[User talk:LT|<sup>Rev. 22:13</sup>]]''''' Tuesday, 21:38, October 9, 2023 (EDT)
 
−
#'''Agree:''' Rob's coverage of the war in Ukraine is flat-out bonkers, pro-Putin fan fiction. It's brimming with [[deceit]] and, as it regularly splashes over on to MPR, you've got actual plague signs on your front door for any minimally informed, new conservative readers / editors. Many socks died over the years trying for a similar effect. [[User:ConwayIII|ConwayIII]] ([[User talk:ConwayIII|talk]]) 17:10, October 10, 2023 (EDT)
 
−
#:Yep. We take a hardline stance against Nazism and the real Nazis cry ouch and come crawling out of the woodwork. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 17:53, October 10, 2023 (EDT)
 
−
#::Is it possible to be anti-Putin and anti-Nazi at the same time? Hint: does 2+2=4? [[User:MayGodBless|MayGodBless]] ([[User talk:MayGodBless|talk]]) 18:46, October 10, 2023 (EDT)
 
−
#:::In the context of the [[Ukraine war]], no. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 18:49, October 10, 2023 (EDT)
 
−
#::::It's Nazis all the way down, man. The swines probably bio-engineered your brain worms, too. Like, on their moonbase or something. [[User:ConwayIII|ConwayIII]] ([[User talk:ConwayIII|talk]]) 18:53, October 10, 2023 (EDT)
 
−
#::::::Although I was recently delighted to obtain the book ''Alice in Wonderland'' in both text and audio, I generally prefer nonfiction over fiction. So I don't go down the rabbit holes of RobSmith's fictional encyclopedia entries or talk page posts. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:04, October 10, 2023 (EDT)
 
−
#:::::Absolutely, unequivocally false. Stalin fought Hitler, but that does not mean we must support Stalin or else be Nazis. [[User:MayGodBless|MayGodBless]] ([[User talk:MayGodBless|talk]]) 19:06, October 10, 2023 (EDT)
 
−
#:::::Here's the Catch-22 many anti-Putin and anti-Russian [[bigot]]s painted themselves into: Putin says: "We're going to war against Nazism". Critics says, "Oh, that's just Putin propaganda for the stupid Russian masses", which of course then makes you a Russophobic Nazi bigot. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 19:15, October 10, 2023 (EDT)
 
−
#::::::Putin can go to war against Nazism, and still be responsible for the murder of Litvinenko and countless others. Your simplistic view of the war is that there must be a good side and a bad side. Guess what? In real life (something you, a realist, should care an awful lot about), both sides can be bad. [[User:MayGodBless|MayGodBless]] ([[User talk:MayGodBless|talk]]) 21:24, October 10, 2023 (EDT)
 
−
#:::::::No, I think that's the charge that could made against critics - being simplistic. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 22:17, October 10, 2023 (EDT)
 
−
#'''Agree:''' Sometimes Rob sounds like he means well, but then he deletes good content, acts abusively towards other good-faith editors, and pushes pro-communism views. --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">DavidB4</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 22:19, October 10, 2023 (EDT)
 
−
#:Being anti-Nazi is not pro-communist - unless you somehow got Nazi = conservative confused. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 22:31, October 10, 2023 (EDT)
 
−
#:Yeah, RobSmith has become a full Communist shill for the past year. He has admitted that aligning with Communists is a supposedly necessary effort to fight off the Ukrainian Nazis, and thus stifles any meaningful anti-Communist exposé because he believes in the neo-Marxist and neo-Nazi narrative that "Nazism = anti-Communism," while conservatives by contrast acknowledge that both National Socialism and Marxist Socialism are very similar far-left ideologies. He rollbacked my well-substantiated, highly sourced edits [[Special:Diff/1991943|here]] and then slandered me on Andy's talk page as a "Nazisymp." I in no way excused Nazism; I simply pointed out that Communists let Nazis into power. The sooner he is defrocked, the better, so Conservapedia finally purges this cancerous stain. —[[User:LT|<code><span style="background:#FF8181">'''LT'''</span></code>]] '''''[[User talk:LT|<sup>Rev. 22:13</sup>]]''''' Wednesday, 22:45, October 10, 2023 (EDT)
 
  
−
#::The problem basically is editors falling for Western propaganda alleging that Vladimir Putin is a communist, or that the Russian Federation is attempting to re-create the Soviet Union. If you bit off on that line of garbage (which you were warned against), don't be surprised if you were labeled a nazisymp. Just as you unfairly labeled Putin and Russia as "communist", now it boomerangs back at you - especially since NATO and the West has lost the war. It would have been easier to listen and pay attention earlier. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 23:06, October 10, 2023 (EDT)
+
===Russia hoaxer===
 +
[[User:Conservative]]: "Plus, in the past, '''when Trump's real estate empire was in trouble, Russian loan money helped bail him out.''' So he probably has some positive sentiments as far as Russia. I had a key person in my life who was a Russian who helped me so that created some goodwill on how I view Russia. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 00:29, June 9, 2025 (EDT)
  
−
===Anti-endorsements===
+
::<big>'''"when Trump's real estate empire was in trouble, Russian loan money helped bail him out"'''</big> [https://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Aschlafly/Archives/archive75#Boss.2C_I_need_a_new_sparring_partner_concerning_Russia._An_editor_I_troll_does_not_produce_counter_essays._He_weakly_reverts_criticisms_of_Russia_on_main_page_talk_that_he_cannot_refute._I_could_carve_out_of_a_banana_a_tougher_sparring_partner]
−
== Conservative content keeps getting removed ==
+
{{Cquote|'''Lara Logan:''' So tell me this, What is it that people still don't know about the [[Russiagate|Russia conspiracy]] that you think is still the most relevant right now?<br>
 +
'''Hans Mahncke:''' Overall I would say, the fact that '''everything was made up. Everything. Everything was made up I don't think has sunk in broadly enough. People might think, "Oh well, they made up this or that." No. They made up everything.'''}}
 +
::Lara Logan interview with Hans Mahncke, June 20, 2025: [https://youtu.be/lrzbY1ENf0o?list=PLqa3ixeybN6Ep9xNduVc9LLskcrAX7Zlm&t=39]
 +
[[File:27067022 1565197686869300 6687960957434384962 n.jpg|center|650px|thumb|]]
 +
Russian sanctions were imposed on the [[false]] pretext of Russian vote hacking.
  
−
Hi Andy, to let you know, I'm more than happy to pour in hours more time to add conservative content to this wiki and do what I can to flourish page view growth. However, I cannot do that if my additions are reverted. For example, more recently [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Holocaust&action=history here], my edits were point-blank rollbacked with no reason given, with the page locked, because the rollbacker, a bitter opponent of reality he cannot face, decided I was too anti-Communist (I provided quality citations, but those were ignored).
+
[https://www.dni.gov/files/ODNI/documents/DIG/DIG-Russia-Hoax-Memo-and-Timeline_revisited.pdf Declassified Evidence of Obama Administration Conspiracy to Subvert President Trump’s 2016 Victory and Presidency], [[DNI]] [[Tulsi Gabbard]], July 18, 2025.
  
−
I very much hope you would like to retain my presence on the site so I can gain extra page views for you, as much as I myself would like to. But I cannot do that any longer if my good-faith edits for the cause of advancing conservative values are removed. Please make the right decision here; thank you. —[[User:LT|<code><span style="background:#FF8181">'''LT'''</span></code>]] '''''[[User talk:LT|<sup>Rev. 22:13</sup>]]''''' Sunday, 17:24, October 8, 2023 (EDT)
+
'''Conclusion:''' Not only is [[User:Conservative]] lacking in analytical skills, he is lacking in informational skills to discern [[truth]] from [[error]], and relies on old [[liberal claptrap]] from the [[MSM]] in the back of mind to shape his views and thinking.
−
{{warning collapse|reason=personal attack|content=
 
−
:No, Conservapedia is not going to allow [[nazi apologist]]s to blame the Holocaust on Communists. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 17:28, October 8, 2023 (EDT)
 
  
−
:And it's insulting to sit here and listen to your attempts to deny the Holocaust was solely the responsibility of Nazis, and shift the blame to Communists, and call that "conservative content".
+
==RobSmith==
 +
RobSmith continues to exhibit the characteristic behavior of an [[idiot]] who thinks he understands subjects which are far too complex for his limited intelligence to comprehend. '''''He must be desysopped'''''. [[User:MayGodBless|MayGodBless]] ([[User talk:MayGodBless|talk]]) 18:48, September 9, 2026 (EDT)
 +
:Let's topic ban [[User:RobSmith]] from [[Liberal Russia]], including its [[dictator]], [[Pathetic Putin]]. [[User:MayGodBless|MayGodBless]] ([[User talk:MayGodBless|talk]]) 10:30, September 18, 2026 (EDT)
  
−
:If you had used talk pages properly as what they were intended for, rather than trolling, your edits would not have been reverted on sight without discussion. Just as you had spent much time in researching those edits, and I know you did, it also takes much to engage in the type of trolling you have engaged in over the past week and a little longer. Yes, I know, your edits ''do have a place in Conservapedia'', only not on the [[Holocaust]] entry. There was one other series of edits, I also felt did not belong on another page but perhaps elsewhere. You are the one who has refused discussion of content, hence you were reverted.  [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 17:54, October 8, 2023 (EDT)
+
==refs==
−
}}
+
{{reflist}}
−
::Oh, I'm a Nazi apologist because I point out that Communists helped Nazis get into power? I'd call your lying hide a turd, but you're such an abominable stink to humanity and abhorrent to the point of being unfit for composting. As the old saying goes, '''ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do.''' Thus also saith the scriptures, '''all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.''' When you scream and howl as you burn in hellfire, about to face eternal destruction, no sympathy will be found from me as you look up and find the saints disgusted that a piece of garbage like you ever came out of a womb. —[[User:LT|<code><span style="background:#FF8181">'''LT'''</span></code>]] '''''[[User talk:LT|<sup>Rev. 22:13</sup>]]''''' Wednesday, 22:52, October 10, 2023 (EDT)
 
−
:::You can do that, but you can't do it on the Holocaust page. The Communists were not responsible for the Holocaust. The same article lists Communists in the paragraphs before your insertion  as the next target for Nazi extermination in the Holocaust.
 
−
:::You need to learn how to use Talk pages properly; and Conservapedia is not going to be a platform for nazi apologetics, which is exactly what you tried to insert, knowingly or unknowingly, into the Holocaust page. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 22:58, October 10, 2023 (EDT)
 
−
::::Keep up your lies, and you will find yourself deeper in the lake to come, submerged in the depths of fire and brimstone and drowning in the stinking burnt smell of brimstone only to find your own hide of greater rottenness. When the vengeance of eternal fire consumes you to annihilation, no remaining redeemed person will ever remember the existence of your worthless excuse of a human soul, because by your iniquities you deserve to wail and scream in the judgment of decibel torment for all the works of perdition you carried out by the power of your father the devil. —[[User:LT|<code><span style="background:#FF8181">'''LT'''</span></code>]] '''''[[User talk:LT|<sup>Rev. 22:13</sup>]]''''' Wednesday, 23:03, October 10, 2023 (EDT)
 
−
{{cquote|And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient; being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers, backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful: who knowing the judgment of God, '''that they which commit such things are worthy of death''', not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.|||Romans 1:28–32}}
 
−
::::You, ☭RobSmith☭, are a key example of the wicked "people" the Apostle Paul condemns. And you ''know'' you deserve eternal death. You are of your father the devil, and into eternal damnation you will join your father. —[[User:LT|<code><span style="background:#FF8181">'''LT'''</span></code>]] '''''[[User talk:LT|<sup>Rev. 22:13</sup>]]''''' Wednesday, 23:06, October 10, 2023 (EDT)
 

Latest revision as of 14:30, September 18, 2026

This is the place for Conservapedia users to make complaints about other Conservapedia editor's actions, attitude, civility, or ideological leanings Please re-read Conservapedia:Guidelines#Civility and Conservapedia:Editing etiquette before posting here. In this mainspace, and only this mainspace, is the basic civility rule of not posting Editor usernames in subheadings waived for the purpose of soliciting other members of the Community to comment or gang up on an Editor. All other civility rules and etiquette guidelines, however, are not waived. Please act accordingly.
For complaints against Admin, see Conservapedia:Sysop complaint documentation. Please do not be redundant and spam complaints on multiple pages across Conservapedia.

Conservapedia:User complaints/Archives

User:Conservative

Locus of dispute

User:Conservative posted in Conservapedia:

“ RobS becoming a pawn and a "useful idiot" of an atheist website

RobS is now spouting to some atheists that I supposedly stated something in a communication with him about one of my articles. It wasn't very positive.[Citation Needed] Of course, I have no trust in his Personal remark removed concerning our communication. Please be very careful when communicating with RobS. Do not trust him.[Citation Needed] Based on this discussion with some atheists who have shown malevolence towards this website, I think RobS has little reluctance to try to Personal remark removed.

I think RobS is at heart an Personal remark removed who thinks he has great influence over members of an atheist website. The truth is that if they don't respect God, he is kidding himself if he thinks they respect him. Although he did do a service in unblocking all of those IPs and I think clarifying block policy and not having an overly aggressive block policy is good, I do think now that RobS is now morphing into what the Soviets call "a useful idiot" and he is in the process of becoming a pawn of an atheist website.

If he continues down his present path, I see him losing his Admin rights. Conservative 17:16, 27 July 2011 (EDT)

”

User:Conservative also posted:

“ RobS just tried to bring up me blocking user BobSherman again via my talk page. You, myself and Karajou believes this person is a parodist. RobS knows BobSherman lied at our wiki.[Citation Needed] There is no pressing need to keep rehashing the blocking of a parodist liar....Conservative 05:25, 26 July 2011 (EDT) ”

I had NEVER heard of "Bob Sherman" until he contacted me, per Conservapedia:Administrator's Guide, to look into what he alleged was an unfair blocking. I exercised my duties as an Admin. I could not find any reasonable violation. I did find a pattern and habit of deletions of talk pages. When I approached User:Conservapedia for an explanation of Bob Sherman's blocking, he responded with a very public series of personal attacks against a fellow Admin, [1] again, in violation of standing Conservapedia policy.

My failure to defend myself and respond to the personal attacks led to my de-sysopping, setting an extremely destructive precedent Conservapedia refuses to deal with. It destroyed Conservapedia as a meritocracy, opening the floodgate of allowing personal attacks. RobSRecovering Republican 18:00, December 26, 2025 (EST)

What we have here, besides the outright violations of civility and personal attacks, violation of the Conservapedia: Administrator's Guide which remain unchanged since 2011, is an unending series of lies and gossip which only have festered and become worse. User:Conservative takes encouragement from ownership because of the failure to address these policy concerns and abuses. RobSRecovering Republican 18:26, December 26, 2025 (EST)


“ RobS appears to know that RobertSherman lied at CP... Conservative 11:45, 26 July 2011 (EDT) ”
I do not believe a shred of evidence exists anywhere, in Conservapedia (even if pages are undeleted) or in Sysop email lists that I knew of, ever had any interaction with, or had discussions with other editors about User:BobSherman.
User:Conservative not only lied & gossiped, he invented it out of butthole. And there is a motivation for it: A Ratwikian asked me on my talk page at RW weeks earlier if I thought "Ken was mentally ill", which I NEVER RESPONDED TO, anywhere, not until AFTER I was de-sysopped, and then becoming convinced that the man was deranged.
I have been a completely innocent victim, caught up in User:Conservative's psychotic delusions for 14 years, which I studiously avoided for the first four years of Conservapedia's existence after he privately told me he prayed to God that other members of his church would be kicked out. That absolutely, totally defies my understanding of Christian scripture: "who desires all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth" - 1 Tim 2:4 RobSRecovering Republican 21:55, December 26, 2025 (EST)

User:Conservative has brought disrepute on Conservapedia

User:Conservative (contibs) has brought ill-repute upon the Conservapedia community, refuses to review his articles for questionable wording or content, and apologize to the community.

File:Hate crime indictment Nov 16 2021.PNG

Admitted troll

email to Sysop group list after User:Aschlalfy, owner of the website, requests civility and ending personal attacks:

From: Mark Miller <>

Date: Sat, Apr 5, 2025 at 11:16 PM Subject: re: backhanded compliment and I am still alive To: Andrew Schlafly [redacted], Brian MacDonald>


Andy,

In the popular movie Diehard, the estranged wife Holly Gennaro says of the protagonist John McClane:

"He's still alive. Only John can drive somebody that crazy."

Three websites appeared in the public eye due to my skill of being able to drive people crazy by fully engaging their emotions, logical mind and conscience: Conservapedia (My homosexuality, evolution and atheism content really got under some liberals' skin) and the websites Rationalwiki and Liberalpedia which were reactions to Conservapedia.

And now the poor soul RobSmith is stark raving mad and totally obsessed with me because of my content related to the USA, Russia, China and international politics.

In a way, it is a backhanded compliment that RobSmith is totally obsessed with me. It shows my ability to create content that fully engages the pathos, logos and ethos (emotions, logic and morality) of people.

One of the reasons that I know I am alive is RobSmith's complete and utter obsession with me. 😄

Sincerely,

User: Conservative

Em added.

You are acknowledging that one of the reasons that you are obsessed with me is that I have used logic (Logos) to cause you to be obsessed with me. I marshalled plenty of logic/facts to support my arguments related to the topics of USA/China/Russia and international politics.
Also, for a while, I will not be collecting facts related to these topics as I will be taking a lengthy sabbatical on these particular topics. Instead, I am going to focus my interests on the interesting topics of Christianity/religion/marketing/advertising/promotion/copy writing/sales/personal development/peak performance.
So I suggest you temper your colossal obsession with me and devote it to more worthwhile pursuits. Conservative (talk) 06:39, April 7, 2025 (EDT)
Yah, we've heard these promises by you to quit trolling over extended sabbaticals that usually last about 48 hours. A man is known by his word that he keeps. RobSZelensky Must Go! 06:48, April 7, 2025 (EDT)
P.S. Again, by your own words, you seem to have MSM news sources & globalist think tanks confused with "facts" - which are the sources for all your trolling spam, not "logic" or reasoned debate & discussion. RobSZelensky Must Go! 07:24, April 7, 2025 (EDT)
You are upset that my proverbial SAMs of talking about how bad the Russian/Chinese economies are and how bad their demographics are have taken down your proverbial Sukhoi Su-57.😄 You are a very sore loser. 😄
As much as I hate to say it, I hereby declare total victory for truth, justice and the American way. USA! USA! USA! Olé! Olé! Olé! Conservative (talk) 12:39, May 27, 2025 (EDT)
This is not a content dispute. It is about behavior:
RobSZelensky Must Go! 12:56, May 27, 2025 (EDT)

Mearsheimer

In the "John Joseph Mearsheimer" article - which User:Conservative created, contains this information:
Mearsheimer is in the Myrotvorets (English: Peacemaker) database, usually known as the Ukrainian Nazi kill list, which is an online database of what its owner, Anton Gerashchenko, declares as “enemies of Ukraine,” containing personal doxxing information and addresses.[1] The kill list is maintained by Gerashchenko, a member of the Ukrainian parliament (Rada) and deputy minister of the Interior. Its servers are located in Brussels, Belgium and operated by NATO and the CIA. For enforcement of the kill list, the Ukrainian Teroborona, SBU, and Neo-Nazi Azov Battalion are organizations within the Ukrainian Ministry of Interior, and not in the Ministry of Defense.
The number of times User:Conservative inhibited other user's productive editing with spam misquotes about Mearsheimer, harassment, & trolling can be deduced from here.

Nazi sourcing & spam

Of late, User:Conservative has been spamming & edit warring over Talk:Main_Page#A_Nazi_created_the_Nazi_kill_list on several pages he has posted redundant spam into (see [2] for instance). To any normal person or jury of his peers, this should be abundant evidence User:Conservative is an uncooperative editor and troll.
 
Deputy Ukrainian Interior Minister and Advisor to President Zelensky Anton Gerashchenko is the founder and curator of the Ukrainian nazi kill list. Being that private handgun ownership is illegal in Ukraine, the defiant outlaw pose this government official strikes with his finger on the trigger is particularly intimidating to citizens.

Russia hoaxer

User:Conservative: "Plus, in the past, when Trump's real estate empire was in trouble, Russian loan money helped bail him out. So he probably has some positive sentiments as far as Russia. I had a key person in my life who was a Russian who helped me so that created some goodwill on how I view Russia. Conservative (talk) 00:29, June 9, 2025 (EDT)

"when Trump's real estate empire was in trouble, Russian loan money helped bail him out" [3]
“ Lara Logan: So tell me this, What is it that people still don't know about the Russia conspiracy that you think is still the most relevant right now?

Hans Mahncke: Overall I would say, the fact that everything was made up. Everything. Everything was made up I don't think has sunk in broadly enough. People might think, "Oh well, they made up this or that." No. They made up everything.

”
Lara Logan interview with Hans Mahncke, June 20, 2025: [4]
 

Russian sanctions were imposed on the false pretext of Russian vote hacking.

Declassified Evidence of Obama Administration Conspiracy to Subvert President Trump’s 2016 Victory and Presidency, DNI Tulsi Gabbard, July 18, 2025.

Conclusion: Not only is User:Conservative lacking in analytical skills, he is lacking in informational skills to discern truth from error, and relies on old liberal claptrap from the MSM in the back of mind to shape his views and thinking.

RobSmith

RobSmith continues to exhibit the characteristic behavior of an idiot who thinks he understands subjects which are far too complex for his limited intelligence to comprehend. He must be desysopped. MayGodBless (talk) 18:48, September 9, 2026 (EDT)

Let's topic ban User:RobSmith from Liberal Russia, including its dictator, Pathetic Putin. MayGodBless (talk) 10:30, September 18, 2026 (EDT)

refs

  1. ↑ Ukrainian “Hit list” Publishes names and addresses of alleged “Russian propagandists:” Turns out to be based not in Ukraine but in Langley VA where CIA headquarters is located, By Jeremy Kuzmarov (Posted Sep 21, 2022). mronline.org
Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:User_complaints&oldid=2205325"