Difference between revisions of "Satires of evolution"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 8: Line 8:
 
*[[Essay: Professor PZ Myers fails his applied biology course|Professor PZ Myers fails his applied biology course]]
 
*[[Essay: Professor PZ Myers fails his applied biology course|Professor PZ Myers fails his applied biology course]]
 
*[[Essay: Does Richard Dawkins have machismo?|Does evolutionist Richard Dawkins have machismo?]]
 
*[[Essay: Does Richard Dawkins have machismo?|Does evolutionist Richard Dawkins have machismo?]]
 +
*[[Essay: Atheist PZ Myers agrees with the Christian, creationist Shockofgod|Atheist PZ Myers agrees with the Christian, creationist Shockofgod]]
 
*[http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2013/02/evidently-world-has-no-great-need-of.html Jobless evolutionary biologists]
 
*[http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2013/02/evidently-world-has-no-great-need-of.html Jobless evolutionary biologists]
 
*[http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2013/06/fergus-mason-anytime-you-want-your-head.html Fergus Mason, anytime you want your head back, just debate VivaYehshua]
 
*[http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2013/06/fergus-mason-anytime-you-want-your-head.html Fergus Mason, anytime you want your head back, just debate VivaYehshua]

Revision as of 21:53, September 29, 2014

Perhaps if the atheist PZ Myers drank more Slimfast and less beer, he would have had a trimmer figure in this picture.

(photo obtained from Flickr, see license agreement)

Below are some satires of evolution:

See also

Postscript: The transitional animal the flying kitty?

The transitional life form flying kitty.gif

For more information please see: The transitional animal the flying kitty?

Please notice the much debated "tail rudder system" for the flying kitty which evolutionary "scientists" claim evolved over time, but which creation scientists assert were obviously the work of intelligent design. Flying kitties are believed by evolutionists to be closely related to the flying pig species, but creation scientists counter that evolutionists have yet to offer any proof and evidence for this claim. For details on how evolutionary "scientists" arrive at their findings please see: You obviously don't understand how science works...