Difference between revisions of "Evolutionary belief and sexual immorality"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(→‎Atheism and sexual immorality)
Line 10: Line 10:
  
 
In identifying the primary factors determining these differences in community attitudes, the author of the research report, Dr Jonathan Kelley, said: ‘The single most important influence after church attendance is the theory of evolution.’<ref>[http://creation.com/morals-decline-linked-to-belief-in-evolution Morals decline linked to evolution]</ref>}}
 
In identifying the primary factors determining these differences in community attitudes, the author of the research report, Dr Jonathan Kelley, said: ‘The single most important influence after church attendance is the theory of evolution.’<ref>[http://creation.com/morals-decline-linked-to-belief-in-evolution Morals decline linked to evolution]</ref>}}
 +
 +
=== Notable bestiality problems in areas where Darwinism and atheism are prevalent ===
 +
 +
In areas of the [[Western World]] where there is a significant amount of [[atheism|atheists]] and evolutionary belief, there have been notable problems related to [[bestiality]] (see: [[Evolutionary belief and bestiality]] and [[Geographic areas where bestiality is posing a notable problem]]).
 +
 +
See also:
 +
 +
*[[Bestiality and Sweden]]
 +
 +
*[[Bestiality and Germany]]
 +
 +
*[[Denmark and bestiality]]
 +
 +
*[[Netherlands and bestiality]]
 +
 +
*[[Bestiality and Britain]]
 +
 +
*[[Washington state and bestiality]]
 +
 +
*[[Bestiality and Australia]]
  
 
== Atheism and sexual immorality ==
 
== Atheism and sexual immorality ==

Revision as of 21:28, October 9, 2014

[[File:Peter-Singer.jpg|right|thumbnail|250px|The atheist and evolutionist philosopher Peter Singer defends the practice of bestiality (as well as abortion, infanticide and euthanasia). Despite holding these immoral views the liberal and pro-evolution academic establishment rewarded his views with a bioethics chair at Princeton University.[1]

In July of 2000, Creation Ministries International reported:

“ For years, many people have scoffed at any suggestion that the evils in society could be linked with the teaching of the theory of evolution. But new research has confirmed what Bible-believers have known all along—that the rising acceptance of Darwin’s theory is related to declining morality in the community.

The research survey of 1535 people, conducted by the Australian National University, revealed that belief in evolution is associated with moral permissiveness. Darwin himself apparently feared that belief in evolution by the common man would lead to social decay. The survey showed that people who believed in evolution were more likely to be in favour of premarital sex than those who rejected Darwin’s theory. Another issue which highlighted the contrast between the effect of evolutionary ideas and that of biblical principles was that Darwinians were reported to be ‘especially tolerant’ of abortion.

In identifying the primary factors determining these differences in community attitudes, the author of the research report, Dr Jonathan Kelley, said: ‘The single most important influence after church attendance is the theory of evolution.’[2]

”

Notable bestiality problems in areas where Darwinism and atheism are prevalent

In areas of the Western World where there is a significant amount of atheists and evolutionary belief, there have been notable problems related to bestiality (see: Evolutionary belief and bestiality and Geographic areas where bestiality is posing a notable problem).

See also:

Atheism and sexual immorality

See also: Atheism and morality and Atheist moral failings

Since World War II a majority of the most prominent and vocal defenders of the evolutionary position which employs methodological naturalism have been atheists and agnostics (see also: Causes of evolutionary belief)[3]

The Barna Group found that atheists and agnostics in America were more likely, than theists in America, to look upon the following behaviors as morally acceptable: illegal drug use; excessive drinking; sexual relationships outside of marriage; abortion; cohabitating with someone of opposite sex outside of marriage; obscene language; gambling; pornography and obscene sexual behavior; and engaging in homosexuality/bisexuality.[4] Given the many diseases associated with homosexuality, the biblical prohibition against homosexuality is quite arguably one of the many examples where the Bible exhibited knowledge that was ahead of its time.

Articles related to atheism and sexual immorality:

References

  1. ↑
  2. ↑ Morals decline linked to evolution
  3. ↑
  4. ↑ http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/5-barna-update/58-practical-outcomes-replace-biblical-principles-as-the-moral-standard
Retrieved from "https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Evolutionary_belief_and_sexual_immorality&oldid=1110548"