Satires of evolution

Below are some satires of evolution:

• Professor PZ Myers fails his applied biology course
• Do evolutionists lack machismo?
• PZ Myers embarrasses himself at the Creation Museum
• Western atheists sumo wrestling - survival of the fattest?
• You obviously don't understand how science works...
• As always, there is more work to be done
• Does evolutionist Richard Dawkins have machismo?
• The transitional animal the flying kitty?
• Accurate science?
• Does Thunderf00t lack machismo?
• The atheism and science blues
• Ian Juby YouTube channel
• The overwhelming proof and evidence for evolution
• The atheist and evolutionist helpline
• Accurate science?
• This year's best atheist debaters
• The transitional animal the flying pig?
• Richard Dawkins' lack of appeal to the Asian woman audience
• Evolutionist janitors
• Evolutionary timeline
• The Tower of Evobabble
• Atheists clinging to 19th century "science"
• The latest findings for evolution which are particularly powerful ...
• Evolution
• Darwin-Hitler and evolutionary racism
• The Darwin-Stalin connection
• Teaching evolution
• Monkey science
• Satire of atheist Daniel Dennet
• What Evolutionists Think Is Random

See also

• Comedy and satires concerning atheism and evolution (large collection of comedy/satire concerning atheism and evolution)
• Evolution
• Creation scientists tend to win the creation vs. evolution debates
• Poe's law

Postscript: The transitional animal the flying kitty?

For more information please see: The transitional animal the flying kitty?

Please notice the much debated "tail rudder system" for the flying kitty which evolutionary "scientists" claim evolved over time, but which creation scientists assert were obviously the work of intelligent design. Flying kitties are believed by evolutionists to be closely related to the flying pig species, but creation scientists counter that evolutionists have yet to offer any proof and evidence for this claim. For details on how evolutionary "scientists" arrive at their findings please see: You obviously don't understand how science works...