Talk:Covid lockdown

Australian politics

Rob Smith, re the recent revert, please note that "The current Prime Minister [of Australia] is Scott Morrison who is the leader of the Liberal Party (a right-leaning political party)" (Australia, Conservapedia). See Australia for an explanation of the use of "liberal" in this context. --Jackin the box (talk) 14:55, February 9, 2022 (EST)

Interesting you should say this; actually, the human rights abuses mentioned are occurring at the state level. RobS^{Let's Go Brandon!} 14:59, February 9, 2022 (EST)

Thanks for the clarification. I'll check further. --Jackin the box (talk) 15:03, February 9, 2022 (EST) Shouldn't the caption by changed, as the word "regime"does suggests the national government were responsible?

The government for Melbourne, Victoria appears to be Labour. The use, here, of the word facsist in the caption was confusing, Fascism: '"An authoritarian and nationalistic system of government and social organization ... an extreme right-wing political ideology based on the principles underlying this system" (OED).

Bingo. You put your finger on the problem - a faulty definition of fascism. RobS^{Let's Go Brandon!} 15:43, February 9, 2022 (EST)

Leviticus

Leviticus does not mandate lockdown as a preventative measure. That reference should be removed. RobS^{Let's Go Brandon!} 17:02, March 13, 2022 (EDT)

I don't understand, RobS, your recent edit. Are you suggesting that the so-called "lockdown" isn't a form of quarantine? If so, please explain the difference. See [1] and [2] for more about what the Bible has to say on this topic. This obviously doesn't mean that the effectiveness of quarantine regulation cannot be questioned. But what we have had is ancient rules being applied to a new disease. --Jackin the box (talk) 17:52, March 13, 2022 (EDT)

Lockdown is not a medical term. It is a law enforcement term originating in prisons when tensions and riots erupt that was extended to schools when shootings occur. RobS^{Let's Go Brandon!} 17:56, March 13, 2022 (EDT)

Lockdown has nothing to do with the prevention or treatment of disease. It is term that describes prison guards accounting for the whereabouts of prisoners and surveillance by government officials to control a population. RobS^{Let's Go Brandon!} 18:02, March 13, 2022 (EDT)

Yeah. --Jackin the box (talk) 18:15, March 13, 2022 (EDT)

Jackin, these particular lockdowns were politically motivated and were done solely for the purpose of imposing power and control on the public. It was never about "health" or "public safety" with the Biden regime, Justin Trudeau, any other political leader who went along with the scamdemic nonsense or their respective public health bureaucrat underlings. Northwest (talk) 18:18, March 13, 2022 (EDT)

A lockdown is a form of quarantine, please don't play word games. The phrase is a hyperbolic metaphor, the kind that journalists love. But I agree that politician have meddled too much in matters that should primarily be left in the hands of medical professionals. By the way neither of you have seemed to have bothered checking your Bibles and the sources, linked above. --Jackin the box (talk) 19:39, March 13, 2022 (EDT)

No, Rob had it right the first time (and made that clear in the main article) - and I should note that many of these so-called "medical professionals" are acting at the behest of the above-named politicians as well as Big Pharma. If anyone is playing word games here, Jackin, that would be you, with regards to your apologism for the CCP flu "vaccines". Northwest (talk) 22:30, March 13, 2022 (EDT)

OK on further thought there may be subtle differences between the two terms, which should be clarified. --Jackin the box (talk) 19:59, March 13, 2022 (EDT)

A lockdown is a subset of quarrantines. But not all quarantines are lockdowns. Conservative (talk) 23:26, March 13, 2022 (EDT)

When Typhoid Mary was running around, they didn't quarantine the global. RobS^{Let's Go Brandon!} 23:38, March 13, 2022 (EDT)

Why should they? A poor example!

Rules, however, shouldn't be needed in a Christian society to compel people into following sensible medical adverse and thus to protect each other.--Jackin the box (talk) 11:57, March 23, 2022 (EDT)

Lockdowns were anti-science population control measures. They had nothing to do with public health or the spread of disease. "15 days to flatten the curve" supposedly was to prevent hospitals from being overwhelmed, which never did occur anyway. RobS^{Let's Go Brandon!} 13:46, March 23, 2022 (EDT)

As we speak, the CDC is faking the numbers, reducing the number of child deaths by 24%. That's called science and your tax dollars at work. RobS^{Let's Go Brandon!} 13:51, March 23, 2022 (EDT)