Page history
Talk: Early voting
November 23, 2012
→HB 244 in Georgia: no legislative history
+337
→HB 244 in Georgia: re
+410
→HB 244 in Georgia: the no-excuse absentee ballot provision was unlikely an amendment offered by a conservative or even a Republican
+277
→HB 244 in Georgia: re
+650
→HB 244 in Georgia: The Georgia bill is more than 5 years ago, making its value questionable. Regardless, can I infer that the Dems added the absentee voting amendment?
+216
→HB 244 in Georgia: new section
+794
add a bit more for honesty
+375
→How exactly does it disenfranchise?
+224
→How exactly does it disenfranchise?
+1,149
→How exactly does it disenfranchise?: Due diligence requires awaiting completion of presentation of the "evidence" - i.e., campaigns. Jurors who keep their mind open until the end are performing
+424
→How exactly does it disenfranchise?
+939
→How exactly does it disenfranchise?: If 99% of the electorate vote early before campaigns are over, then the conscientious voter who does his due diligence by voting on Election Day has been dise
+439
→How exactly does it disenfranchise?: new section
+317
November 18, 2012
November 15, 2012
→Additional States and voter rolls
+242
→Additional States and voter rolls
+1,245
no edit summary
+322
→Additional States and voter rolls
+581
→Additional States and voter rolls
+184
November 14, 2012
→re: claim that early voting undermines voter ID: interesting notes on voter ID and no-excuse absentee voting
+422
→re: claim that early voting undermines voter ID: new section
+832
November 13, 2012
→Additional States and voter rolls: Yes, you're right. Oregon and Washington are 100% early voting ... and as result it is virtually impossible for a Republican to win there.
+265
no edit summary
+509
October 30, 2012
October 29, 2012
→Need sources
m+3
hurricane
+201
→Need sources: spoilt ballots are another solution
+150
→Need sources: response
+572
→Need sources: Early voting infringes on the right not to vote. For example, it subjects union workers to repeated harassment over a period of days or weeks until they vote.
+228
→Need sources: response
+782
October 28, 2012
re
+456
→Need sources: re
+468
→Need sources
+419
no edit summary
+1,311
→Need sources
+258
→Need sources: The statements about the defects in early voting are logical.
+195
→Need sources
+294
→Voter intimidation
+233
→Need sources: added cites
+167
October 27, 2012
no edit summary
+309
→Need sources: thanks for the response, but not self-evident
+370
→Voter intimidation: Studies show that overall turnout is not increased by early voting. If anything, it detracts from the respect of Election Day.
+194
I'll look for cites, but the truth of the statement is self-evident.
+134
need sources
+587