Page history
Talk: Intelligent design
January 5, 2013
→Double Standards for Intelligent Design
+1
→Double Standards for Intelligent Design: new section
+867
February 28, 2012
December 6, 2011
December 4, 2011
December 3, 2011
→SETI: Thanks for feedback
+351
Laughably obvious strawman fallacy opens up this section - nice try, liberals
+1,203
→SETI
+174
→SETI
+117
edit proposition
+2,357
August 5, 2011
→[http://www.conservapedia.com/Intelligent_design#cite_note-0] is a logical fallacy
+77
→[http://www.conservapedia.com/Intelligent_design#cite_note-0] is a logical fallacy
+739
→[http://www.conservapedia.com/Intelligent_design#cite_note-0] is a logical fallacy
+289
July 20, 2011
June 3, 2011
Reverted edits by Dustcake (talk) to last revision by DMorris
m-264
→[http://www.conservapedia.com/Intelligent_design#cite_note-0] is a logical fallacy
+264
April 14, 2011
April 12, 2011
April 10, 2011
→[http://www.conservapedia.com/Intelligent_design#cite_note-0] is a logical fallacy: RE:
+70
→[http://www.conservapedia.com/Intelligent_design#cite_note-0] is a logical fallacy
+168
→[http://www.conservapedia.com/Intelligent_design#cite_note-0] is a logical fallacy
+52
→[http://www.conservapedia.com/Intelligent_design#cite_note-0] is a logical fallacy
-25
→[http://www.conservapedia.com/Intelligent_design#cite_note-0] is a logical fallacy
+27
no edit summary
+235
January 30, 2011
March 28, 2010
no edit summary
Replaced content with '{{Wikiproject Religion}} {{protect|TK}} Talk:Intelligent design-Archive-1'
m-72,438
no edit summary
+37