Page history

Valuables

no edit summary

JStone

→‎Women's influence on science

Ed Poor

→‎Women's influence on science: Okay

JStone

→‎Women's influence on science

JDWpianist

→‎Women's influence on science: some recommendations for Ed

Jaddriscoll

no edit summary

Ed Poor

hmm, my work output is studded with typos ... maybe I should hire a girl to do some proofreading ... ducks and runs!

Ed Poor

→‎Women's influence on science: Let's just tell the truth, and let the chips fall where they may.

Tisane

→‎Women's influence on science: re

Ed Poor

correcting my typos

Ed Poor

→‎Women's influence on science: ... has been just slightly more than negligible

Aschlafly

→‎Women's influence on science: I agree with your point and suggestion. Please go ahead and edit as you think best.

Jaddriscoll

no edit summary

Jaddriscoll

→‎Women's influence on science: new section

Karajou

→‎Can this be looked at seriously?

NorthernSights

→‎Can this be looked at seriously?: new section

Ed Poor

Reverted edits by Fuzzy (Talk) to last revision by Aschlafly

Fuzzy

→‎Opus Majus: new section

Aschlafly

→‎Aspects of science: your distinctions are great, but my own view is that politics transcends all categories and all disciplines

Ed Poor

→‎Scope of scientific study: human mind

Ed Poor

Three aspects of science - should inform this article

Ed Poor

→‎Scope of scientific study: new section

Brendanw

→‎Some claim that

Philip J. Rayment

→‎Some claim that: You're still dismissing scholarship, but here's more. And you still haven't justified weasel words.

Brendanw

→‎Some claim that

Philip J. Rayment

→‎Some claim that: Not rumour.

Brendanw

→‎Some claim that: new section

Philip J. Rayment

→‎Removal of quotes: Clarification as requested.

TheGySom

no edit summary

Philip J. Rayment

Removal of quotes

PhoenixWright

Oops! Sorry

Philip J. Rayment

→‎Scientists before Christ: Not a coincidence??

PhoenixWright

→‎Scientists before Christ

Philip J. Rayment

→‎Scientists before Christ: You're making the genetic fallacy

PhoenixWright

→‎Scientists before Christ

PhoenixWright

→‎Scientists before Christ

Philip J. Rayment

→‎Scientists before Christ: What's the problem and what bias?

PhoenixWright

→‎Scientists before Christ

PhoenixWright

→‎Scientists before Christ

Philip J. Rayment

→‎Scientists before Christ: Why?

PhoenixWright

→‎Scientists before Christ

Philip J. Rayment

→‎Scientists before Christ: Willing ignorance

Ed Poor

agreeing with Philip and then making another point

Philip J. Rayment

→‎Scientists before Christ: How about "scientific revolution" instead?

Drochld

→‎Scientists before Christ: Maybe we should also not that most Europeans and Americans at the time were Christians. It puts into contrast the strange divide we see now.

Drochld

→‎Scientists before Christ: I suggest "Most of the scientists in the early modern scientific era . . ."

Philip J. Rayment

→‎Scientists before Christ: Is this your suggestion?

Drochld

→‎Scientists before Christ: good science or no, early greeks did at least some science

Philip J. Rayment

→‎Scientists before Christ: Rationale; what do you think?

Barikada

→‎Scientists before Christ