Page history
User_talk: KSorenson
June 29, 2010
November 13, 2009
→Thank you
+105
→What about the other interactions?
+7,617
no edit summary
+40
→Oooh, fun
+245
→Action at a distance (let's take a break from the black hole stuff)
+10,673
→Action at a distance (let's take a break from the black hole stuff): new section
+1,288
almost no professors, an overwhelmingly liberal and close-minded group, advise students to open their minds and think for themselves.
+369
no edit summary
+473
no edit summary
+14
no edit summary
m+54
no edit summary
+175
reply re: opening the mind
+347
no edit summary
+1,562
falsifiability is not part of the physics curriculum
+396
no edit summary
+1,680
reply, again, re: black holes and falsifiability
+441
no edit summary
+782
November 12, 2009
KSorenson, "connect the dots" is a good childhood game but it does not amount to falsifiability.
+171
no edit summary
+1,005
KSorenson, logic does not require so much verbosity. If you have an experiment that would falsify the claim that black holes exist, let's hear it.
+288
no edit summary
+1,078
no edit summary
+461
no edit summary
+623
no edit summary
+256
no edit summary
+370
no edit summary
+339
no edit summary
+963
this is not Wikipedia where liberal distortions of science dominate. We tell the truth here. The black hole entry is no exception.
+392
no edit summary
+184
no edit summary
+87
I found your edit summary to be misleading for black holes
+127