Difference between revisions of "Evolutionary belief and sexual immorality"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(→‎Atheism and sexual immorality)
(→‎Atheism and sexual immorality)
Line 73: Line 73:
  
 
*[[Atheism and bestiality]]
 
*[[Atheism and bestiality]]
 +
 +
=== Atheism marriage and divorce ===
 +
 +
Please see:
 +
 +
*[[Atheism and marriage]]
 +
 +
*[http://creation.com/atheism#marriage-and-divorce Atheism, marriage and divorce]
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
{{reflist|2}}
 
{{reflist|2}}

Revision as of 21:43, October 9, 2014

The atheist and evolutionist philosopher Peter Singer defends the practice of bestiality (as well as abortion, infanticide and euthanasia). Despite holding these immoral views the liberal and pro-evolution academic establishment rewarded his views with a bioethics chair at Princeton University.[1]

In July of 2000, Creation Ministries International reported:

“ For years, many people have scoffed at any suggestion that the evils in society could be linked with the teaching of the theory of evolution. But new research has confirmed what Bible-believers have known all along—that the rising acceptance of Darwin’s theory is related to declining morality in the community.

The research survey of 1535 people, conducted by the Australian National University, revealed that belief in evolution is associated with moral permissiveness. Darwin himself apparently feared that belief in evolution by the common man would lead to social decay. The survey showed that people who believed in evolution were more likely to be in favour of premarital sex than those who rejected Darwin’s theory. Another issue which highlighted the contrast between the effect of evolutionary ideas and that of biblical principles was that Darwinians were reported to be ‘especially tolerant’ of abortion.

In identifying the primary factors determining these differences in community attitudes, the author of the research report, Dr Jonathan Kelley, said: ‘The single most important influence after church attendance is the theory of evolution.’[2]

”

Notable bestiality problems in areas where Darwinism and atheism are prevalent

On July 1, 2013 the Daily Mail reported that bestiality brothels were spreading quickly through Germany. In addition, there "are even 'erotic zoos' which people can visit to abuse animals ranging from llamas to goats."[3]

In areas of the Western World where there is a significant amount of atheists and evolutionary belief, there have been notable problems related to bestiality (see: Evolutionary belief and bestiality and Geographic areas where bestiality is posing a notable problem).

For example, on July 1, 2013 the Daily Mail reported that bestiality brothels were spreading quickly through Germany. In addition, there "are even 'erotic zoos' which people can visit to abuse animals ranging from llamas to goats."[4]

In February of 2010, the UK news website Metro reported:

“ Given the illicit nature of the product, precise figures on animal pornography video sales are difficult to find, but the Dutch newspaper Algemeen Dagblad, in a 2007 survey, found that distributors in the Netherlands were responsible for some 80 percent of bestiality videos worldwide.[5] ”

See also:

Atheism and sexual immorality

The evolutionist and atheist PZ Myers declared, "...I don’t object to bestiality in a very limited set of specific conditions..."[6][7] See: Atheism and bestiality

(photo obtained from Flickr, see license agreement)

See also: Atheism and morality and Atheist moral failings

Since World War II a majority of the most prominent and vocal defenders of the evolutionary position which employs methodological naturalism have been atheists and agnostics (see also: Causes of evolutionary belief)[8]

The Barna Group found that atheists and agnostics in America were more likely, than theists in America, to look upon the following behaviors as morally acceptable: illegal drug use; excessive drinking; sexual relationships outside of marriage; abortion; cohabitating with someone of opposite sex outside of marriage; obscene language; gambling; pornography and obscene sexual behavior; and engaging in homosexuality/bisexuality.[9] Given the many diseases associated with homosexuality, the biblical prohibition against homosexuality is quite arguably one of the many examples where the Bible exhibited knowledge that was ahead of its time.

Articles related to atheism and sexual immorality:

Atheism marriage and divorce

Please see:

References

  1. ↑
  2. ↑ Morals decline linked to evolution
  3. ↑ [1]
  4. ↑ [2]
  5. ↑ [3]
  6. ↑ Atheist Achilles Heels: Objective Morality and Sacred Life
  7. ↑ The “objective morality” gotcha
  8. ↑
  9. ↑ http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/5-barna-update/58-practical-outcomes-replace-biblical-principles-as-the-moral-standard
Retrieved from "https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Evolutionary_belief_and_sexual_immorality&oldid=1110557"