Difference between revisions of "User:LT/mail"

Revision as of 22:35, June 2, 2021

Upload

I sent an upload request to your email as an attachment cause I had to create it myself. Thanks. RobS^{Free Kyle!} 22:11, 19 February 2021 (EST)

Done; see here. —LT^{May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!} Saturday, 22:21, 19 February 2021 (EST)

About Royal/King Templates

It would make those articles make sense, instead of using a Infobox Person template. --Yeschayi ~ Talk (talk) 23:53, 19 February 2021 (EST)

Yeah, fair point. —LT^{May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!} Saturday, 23:58, 19 February 2021 (EST)

Timely article

Here's a timely article on an historical subject there evidently is a lot of interest in right now. [1] RobS^{Free Kyle!} 03:16, 1 March 2021 (EST)

Move

Do you have Move rights? RobS^{Free Kyle!} 23:13, 16 March 2021 (EDT)

Unfortunately, no. —LT^{May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!} Wednesday, 23:23, 16 March 2021 (EDT)

This is what I mean by no collaboration, cooperation, or communication between users. You make a simple typo like this on an important article, a week later nobody cares, and you can't talk to anyone for fear of being accused of being a RW infiltrator or Nazi spy. RobS^{Free Kyle!} 00:30, 17 March 2021 (EDT)

Thanks for your great work LT!

Thank you for all your great work promoting Conservapedia and the Conservative Cause, and the Gospel, LT! I've been away, as you know, and have returned mainly thanks to you! Thanks for following up and keeping me involved. God bless all your good efforts and richly reward you for it.

In Christ, Nishant X. NishantXavier^{For Christ the King} 00:11, 22 March 2021 (EDT)

You're welcome, and it's a great honor to have you back! —LT^{May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!} Monday, 00:15, 22 March 2021 (EDT)

Hi again Liberal Tears. Please see, if you have time, if you can improve this article: https://conservapedia.com/Debate:_Will_Christianity_reach_3_billion_adherents_by_2030

Thanks and God Bless, Nishant Xavier. NishantXavier^{For Christ the King} 04:39, 26 March 2021 (EDT)

Whoops, sorry for not responding to this sooner. Right now I'm working on some other projects outside of CP, and I'll try to get to that article/debate if I can sometime soon. —LT^{May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!} Wednesday, 11:50, 31 March 2021 (EDT)

Blocking

First, you don't ever speak for me, nor do you apologize for me. Second, you don't reverse my blocks because it makes you feel good. Apparently, you ignored this individual's own history in this site, in Wikipedia, and in other sites where he decided on his own accord to try to force his own personal viewpoint on various subjects, which included the identification and calling out of an edit war by you in the Santa Claus article. His own viewpoint on Conservapedia as a whole is in this page[2], where he condemns us for believing God created the earth in a week. No, we do not this this guy back at all; he can take his viewpoint somewhere else. Karajou (talk) 16:23, 3 April 2021 (EDT)

It's not a big deal. The search engines like original content. If he were to write original content at Conservapedia and then give it some time and then later copy it to Wikipedia that would be better. This way, Conservapedia would get the credit for it to be original content. Conservapedia states in its commandments or guidelines that we don't want people copying content at Wikipedia and posting it at Conservapedia.Conservative (talk) 16:29, 3 April 2021 (EDT)

In other words, we are better off without that editor if he was going to do nothing but copy his Wikpedia content to Conservapedia.Conservative (talk) 16:32, 3 April 2021 (EDT)

That type of lousy attitude is why our Alexa ranking has fallen so much. Furthermore, editors here are allowed to bring over content they write on WP. —LT^{May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!} Saturday, 16:34, 3 April 2021 (EDT)

The lousy attitude is yours. He was blocked for edit wars, and you have the nerve to change it to my own attitude, and a disallowing by me for his WP articles? You need to change your way of thinking. Karajou (talk) 16:40, 3 April 2021 (EDT)

All I was saying is that it could have been worse. It doesn't appear to be a tragedy.Conservative (talk) 16:41, 3 April 2021 (EDT)

Well Karajou, speaking of me needing to change my mind, at least now you're maybe half recognizing that the role of an admin is to convince and persuade others than to outright use the banhammer. I'll hand that to you. Thank you for changing your way of thinking! —LT^{May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!} Sunday, 15:35, 4 April 2021 (EDT)

I spoke to RobS today

I spoke to RobS today. We improved the 90/10 rule at Conservapedia and Andy approved the improvement to the rule. Conservative (talk) 14:56, 9 May 2021 (EDT)

Awesome! —LT^{May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!} Sunday, 14:59, 9 May 2021 (EDT)

Please see: Conservapedia:90/10 rule

I realized I said I would be talking to RobS much later, but I changed my mind about this. Conservative (talk) 14:58, 9 May 2021 (EDT)

Well, the article is certainly interesting. I can only imagine the reactions by RW users when they see these types of page creations of yours! —LT^{May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!} Saturday, 19:07, 22 May 2021 (EDT)

The no longer allow me to edit their website because I know where are the skeletons are in the atheist closet. Perhaps, my "atheism and ..." articles have created more closet atheists. In addition, when I edit their website and mention things like right-wing populism is increasing in Europe in tandem with the growth of European Muslims and Islamic terrorist attacks, it causes them consternation. The thought that Europe is becoming more desecularized and right-wing and that Muslim terrorist attacks are increasing in Europe is too much for them to bear.Conservative (talk) 13:13, 16 May 2021 (EDT)

I'm not sure why they remove your posts regarding extremist far-right violence, seeing that they're already trying to associate the political right with terrorism, etc. I think you bring up some important points because the dark side of populism, despite being demonstrated numerous times throughout history, are still ignored by too many today. —LT^{May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!} Saturday, 19:07, 22 May 2021 (EDT)

I am not sure if you ever saw the movie The Exorcist. But when I talk about the societal benefits of Protestantism/Christianity (see: Christianity and social stability and Protestant cultural legacies) at RationalWiki, it is like the scene in The Exorcist where holy water is sprinkled on the demon-possessed girl. The demon-possessed girl screams out, "You keep it away. Ah! It burns! It burns!". The material about the benefits of Christianity/Protestantism is immediately removed. Conservative (talk) 13:28, 16 May 2021 (EDT)

Hmm, I'm not quite familiar with that movie. I think Bongolian mentioned it to me at one point before my LT account there got banned. Also, speaking of getting banned on RW, they haven't yet blocked an obvious sock of mine from yesterday over there. —LT^{May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!} Saturday, 19:07, 22 May 2021 (EDT)

Here is the scene from The Exorcist: It burns! It burns!.Conservative (talk) 13:52, 16 May 2021 (EDT)

RW is a madhouse. For example, a former RationalWiki Foundation board member and Admin recently put threats to cut himself on several user talk pages and cursed out fellow RationalWikians. There are other incidences like this as well. See: Essay: RationalWiki admits it has a weirdo, pansie infestation. Conservative (talk) 14:00, 16 May 2021 (EDT)

I believe you're referring to GrammarCommie. I was recently contacted by RW user "Unclescrooge" (reminds me of the Walt Disney Comics I read a long time ago, which my local library sadly purged most of just a few years back) who said that GC apparently blocked him for an entire three months last year over some mere silly stuff. That's "RationalWiki" for you. —LT^{May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!} Saturday, 19:07, 22 May 2021 (EDT)

It must be hard to be a RationalWikian. The cognitive dissonance would drive anyone mad after awhile. First, their philosophical worldview was crushed like a tin can by Christian apologists and Connservapedia's atheism articles. And now right-wing populists and Muslims are going to overrun Europe. And perhaps, the Muslims will be driven out of Europe leaving a land full of right-wing populists and Christians.Conservative (talk) 14:48, 16 May 2021 (EDT)

The most amazing thing is the IRS allowing anonymous sockpuppets outside the United States to serve on non-profit foundation boards. RobSFree Kyle! 14:54, 16 May 2021 (EDT)

Even within the United States, how do certain states allow the election of anonymous foundation board sockpuppets to a non-profit entity? Seems to me it would meet the definition of a sham entity. It doesn't meet basic disclosure requirements. RobSFree Kyle! 15:03, 16 May 2021 (EDT)

Looks like a for-profit fundraising scam, and not an educational foundation at all. RobSFree Kyle! 15:05, 16 May 2021 (EDT)

Need your help

Can you help us create a Template:Arab-Israeli conflict with the color green, same as in Template:Terorism? Thanx. RobS^{Free Kyle!} 18:35, June 2, 2021 (EDT)