Difference between revisions of "Gospel of Luke"
m |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Unique to the Gospel of Luke are: | Unique to the Gospel of Luke are: | ||
| − | *The encounter with disciples on the road to Emmaus, whose "eyes were kept from recognizing him | + | *The beautiful, emotion-inducing parables of the [[Prodigal Son|prodigal son]], the [[Good Samaritan|good Samaritan]], and the rich man and Lazarus; |
| − | *The promise of paradise to one crucified alongside Jesus; | + | *The encounter with disciples on the road to Emmaus, whose "eyes were kept from recognizing him";<ref>Luke 24:13-35.</ref> |
| − | + | *The promise of paradise to one crucified alongside Jesus; and | |
*Details about origins and birth of Jesus. | *Details about origins and birth of Jesus. | ||
The witnesses to [[Jesus]] on the road to Emmaus were not any of [[the Apostles]] or [[Mark]], and thus only the historian (Luke) can describe that encounter. | The witnesses to [[Jesus]] on the road to Emmaus were not any of [[the Apostles]] or [[Mark]], and thus only the historian (Luke) can describe that encounter. | ||
| − | Luke may have been inspired by the [[Epistles to the Hebrews]], which is perhaps the best-written Greek work in all of history, and which some of Luke's writings (especially parts of the [[Acts of the Apostles]]) appear to imitate in style and word choice. Luke is considered one of the [[synoptic gospels]] and Luke is generally considered to have borrowed from Mark as one of his sources as did Matthew. It is unknown if Matthew or Luke borrowed from each other or which came first. | + | Luke may have been inspired by the [[Epistles to the Hebrews]], which is perhaps the best-written Greek work in all of history, and which some of Luke's writings (especially parts of the [[Acts of the Apostles]]) appear to imitate in style and word choice. Luke is considered one of the [[synoptic gospels]] and Luke is generally considered to have borrowed from Mark as one of his sources, as did Matthew. It is unknown if Matthew or Luke borrowed from each other or which came first; some material is common to Matthew and Luke but not found in Mark. |
==Authorship== | ==Authorship== | ||
Revision as of 19:37, January 30, 2022
The Gospel of Luke is called "the most beautiful book ever written."[1] It tells the story of the life of Jesus, as written in perfect Greek to Theophilus. Luke does not claim to be an eyewitness, but instead one who has "carefully investigated everything from the beginning" (Luke 1:3) and now wants to "write an orderly account" so that Theophilus would "know the certainty of the things" he had been taught. (Luke 1:3-4) The author Luke was a Gentile, as confirmed by Paul at Colossians 4:11,14. The Gospel of Luke is the 3rd and longest Gospel, placed after Matthew and Mark and before the Gospel of John.
Unique to the Gospel of Luke are:
- The beautiful, emotion-inducing parables of the prodigal son, the good Samaritan, and the rich man and Lazarus;
- The encounter with disciples on the road to Emmaus, whose "eyes were kept from recognizing him";[2]
- The promise of paradise to one crucified alongside Jesus; and
- Details about origins and birth of Jesus.
The witnesses to Jesus on the road to Emmaus were not any of the Apostles or Mark, and thus only the historian (Luke) can describe that encounter.
Luke may have been inspired by the Epistles to the Hebrews, which is perhaps the best-written Greek work in all of history, and which some of Luke's writings (especially parts of the Acts of the Apostles) appear to imitate in style and word choice. Luke is considered one of the synoptic gospels and Luke is generally considered to have borrowed from Mark as one of his sources, as did Matthew. It is unknown if Matthew or Luke borrowed from each other or which came first; some material is common to Matthew and Luke but not found in Mark.
Authorship
The Gospel of Luke does not name its author, but as a companion volume to the book of Acts, it can be inferred by the use of "we" when describing part of Paul's journeys that the author traveled with Paul and Luke, the doctor, becomes the most likely candidate. The extremely sophisticated Greek of Luke also argues for a man who was very educated as does his attention to detail and the medical language in use matches that of other ancient Greek doctors. The ancient church father Irenaeus ascribed the work to Luke as does the Muratorian Canon. It is also mentioned by Clemente of Alexandria.
Place of Writing
Based on the descriptions of places in Palestine, it is generally assumed that the reader was unfamiliar with that land. It's not known where Luke was written, but it is assumed it is outside of Palestine and to an audience that is non-Jewish.
Date
Luke is generally believed to have been written in the 70's or 80's, but it is also possible it was written in the late 50's or early 60's based upon the abrupt ending in Acts.
The arguments for an earlier date are as follows:
- Why wouldn't Luke have continued the history in Acts if he had written it later?
- Why wouldn't he have mentioned the martyrdom of Paul?
- Why is there no mention of the fall of Jerusalem (which took place in 70 A.D.)?