Difference between revisions of "User talk:RobSmith"
(→Essays) |
(→Essays) |
||
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
:::More recently, he has created algorithms inside Conservapedia to suppress other editors work, specifically User:LT and myself. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]</sup> 21:31, December 22, 2023 (EST) | :::More recently, he has created algorithms inside Conservapedia to suppress other editors work, specifically User:LT and myself. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]</sup> 21:31, December 22, 2023 (EST) | ||
| − | ::::Leaving aside his active subversion of other editor's Mainspace contributions, it is [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:_Isolationalism_is_growing_in_the_United_States._Is_this_a_good_thing%3F&diff=2012547&oldid=2012527 this edit here], tying all his Essays together, that creates a very powerful algorithm. That, coupled with Mainspace categorization, makes it very powerful. | + | ::::Leaving aside his active subversion of other editor's Mainspace contributions, it is [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:_Isolationalism_is_growing_in_the_United_States._Is_this_a_good_thing%3F&diff=2012547&oldid=2012527 this edit here], tying all his Essays together, that creates a very powerful algorithm. That, coupled with Mainspace categorization, makes it very powerful. Users are prohibited from self-promotion in Mainspace, so getrs around that by tying it into Mainspace category with hundreds or thousands of pages linked. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]</sup> 21:49, December 22, 2023 (EST) |
Revision as of 02:50, December 23, 2023
- User talk:RobSmith/Archive 1
- User talk:RobSmith/Archive 2
- User talk:RobSmith/Archive 3
- User talk:RobSmith/Archive 4
- User talk:RobSmith/Archive 5
- User talk:RobSmith/Archive 6
- User talk:RobSmith/Archive 7
- User talk:RobSmith/Archive 8
- User talk:RobSmith/Archive 9
- User talk:RobSmith/Archive 10
- User talk:RobSmith/Archive 11
- User talk:RobSmith/Archive 12
- User talk:RobSmith/Archive 13
- User talk:RobSmith/Archive 14
- User talk:RobSmith/Archive 15
Operation Prosperity Guardian
I added your thought [here].Telling (talk)
- Thanks. I'll try to lay out the context of how many days delay using alternate routes, etc. in the next few days. This page will be a longterm project, lasting months, at least. Although fireworks can erupt at any time. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 18:34, December 20, 2023 (EST)
Check your email
I got your message. Please check your email. Conservative (talk) 14:55, December 22, 2023 (EST)
Essays
Let's give the creator of essays greater freedom over their own essays. Thanks.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 20:46, December 22, 2023 (EST)
Andy, we decided a long time ago opinion Essays do not belong in Mainspace categories. That Essay in particular is just redundant racist spam cut n pasted from about 2 dozen other Essays designed to manipulate Google search traffic.
Furthermore, Conservapedia has a rule against self promotion, and in theses spam Essays he has a link to all his other Essays with his user name.
If the Mainspace category is to remain, then the rule against self-promotion should be enforced. Thank you. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 20:51, December 22, 2023 (EST)
- What User:Consewrvative is doing is building an algorithm to promote himself, at the expense of all other editors. Thank you. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 20:53, December 22, 2023 (EST)
- We have a Category where it rightfully belongs, Category:United States History Essays, and if it's a contemporary subject, Category:United States Essays should be created. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 20:58, December 22, 2023 (EST)
- In those Categories the editor should be allowed to link to himself. But using Mainspace Categories for self-promotion of his personal opinions should be denied. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 20:59, December 22, 2023 (EST)
- Rob, you make good points but I think there should be more leeway for strong editors to create essays and categorize them as they think best. That includes you too. Essays are a valuable part of this website (in contrast with the tyranny at Wikipedia which prohibits them). The essay author is easily identified from the entry history.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 21:26, December 22, 2023 (EST)
- I see your point; there's no problem with that. But cheating like this, bending the rules to create algorithms inside Conservapedia to promote his own Essays is what has led to his success. I could have done the same thing a long time ago, but chose to abide by the rules.
- More recently, he has created algorithms inside Conservapedia to suppress other editors work, specifically User:LT and myself. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 21:31, December 22, 2023 (EST)
- Leaving aside his active subversion of other editor's Mainspace contributions, it is this edit here, tying all his Essays together, that creates a very powerful algorithm. That, coupled with Mainspace categorization, makes it very powerful. Users are prohibited from self-promotion in Mainspace, so getrs around that by tying it into Mainspace category with hundreds or thousands of pages linked. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 21:49, December 22, 2023 (EST)