Difference between revisions of "User talk:RobSmith"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Essays: thanks for understanding)
Line 46: Line 46:
 
::::Leaving aside his active subversion of other editor's Mainspace contributions, it is [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:_Isolationalism_is_growing_in_the_United_States._Is_this_a_good_thing%3F&diff=2012547&oldid=2012527 this edit here], tying all his Essays together, that creates a very powerful algorithm. That, coupled with Mainspace categorization, makes it even more powerful. Users are prohibited from self-promotion in Mainspace, so he gets around that by tying it into a Mainspace category with hundreds or thousands of pages linked. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]</sup> 21:49, December 22, 2023 (EST)
 
::::Leaving aside his active subversion of other editor's Mainspace contributions, it is [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:_Isolationalism_is_growing_in_the_United_States._Is_this_a_good_thing%3F&diff=2012547&oldid=2012527 this edit here], tying all his Essays together, that creates a very powerful algorithm. That, coupled with Mainspace categorization, makes it even more powerful. Users are prohibited from self-promotion in Mainspace, so he gets around that by tying it into a Mainspace category with hundreds or thousands of pages linked. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]</sup> 21:49, December 22, 2023 (EST)
  
−
:::::I don't think that affects traffic to anything other than his own essays, so I think more freedom on this is best.  We want to avoid here the stifling aspects of Wikipedia.  Thanks for understanding.
+
:::::I don't think that affects traffic to anything other than his own essays, so I think more freedom on this is best.  We want to avoid here the stifling aspects of Wikipedia.  Thanks for understanding. {{Unsigned|User:Aschlafly}}
 +
 
 +
::::::Well it does affect traffic. When I introduce terms to him that he's never heard (Like "multipolarity" for instance), and writes a half dozen screeds attacking [[multipolarity]] whiuch he knows nothing aobut, and I Google the term, his crap comes up and mine is suppressed.
 +
 
 +
:::::::That's all he's done for the past six months, is use terms he never heard of that I write about, than spam them into a dozen Essays trashing the concepts with [[neocon]] sources, promoting himself while also having an algorithm that specifically suppresses my content. And it's by cheating = blatant self-promotion - that he gets away with it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]</sup> 22:14, December 22, 2023 (EST)

Revision as of 03:14, December 23, 2023

Operation Prosperity Guardian

I added your thought [here].Telling (talk)

Thanks. I'll try to lay out the context of how many days delay using alternate routes, etc. in the next few days. This page will be a longterm project, lasting months, at least. Although fireworks can erupt at any time. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 18:34, December 20, 2023 (EST)

Check your email

I got your message. Please check your email. Conservative (talk) 14:55, December 22, 2023 (EST)

Essays

Let's give the creator of essays greater freedom over their own essays. Thanks.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 20:46, December 22, 2023 (EST)

Andy, we decided a long time ago opinion Essays do not belong in Mainspace categories. That Essay in particular is just redundant racist spam cut n pasted from about 2 dozen other Essays designed to manipulate Google search traffic.

Furthermore, Conservapedia has a rule against self promotion, and in these spam Essays he has a link to all his other Essays with his user name.

If the Mainspace category is to remain, then the rule against self-promotion should be enforced. Thank you. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 20:51, December 22, 2023 (EST)

What User:Consewrvative is doing is building an algorithm to promote himself, at the expense of all other editors. Thank you. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 20:53, December 22, 2023 (EST)
We have a Category where it rightfully belongs, Category:United States History Essays, and if it's a contemporary subject, Category:United States Essays should be created. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 20:58, December 22, 2023 (EST)
In those Categories the editor should be allowed to link to himself. But using Mainspace Categories for self-promotion of his personal opinions should be denied. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 20:59, December 22, 2023 (EST)
Rob, you make good points but I think there should be more leeway for strong editors to create essays and categorize them as they think best. That includes you too. Essays are a valuable part of this website (in contrast with the tyranny at Wikipedia which prohibits them). The essay author is easily identified from the entry history.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 21:26, December 22, 2023 (EST)
I see your point; there's no problem with that. But cheating like this, bending the rules to create algorithms inside Conservapedia to promote his own Essays is what has led to his success. I could have done the same thing a long time ago, but chose to abide by the rules.
More recently, he has created algorithms inside Conservapedia to suppress other editors work, specifically User:LT and myself. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 21:31, December 22, 2023 (EST)
Leaving aside his active subversion of other editor's Mainspace contributions, it is this edit here, tying all his Essays together, that creates a very powerful algorithm. That, coupled with Mainspace categorization, makes it even more powerful. Users are prohibited from self-promotion in Mainspace, so he gets around that by tying it into a Mainspace category with hundreds or thousands of pages linked. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 21:49, December 22, 2023 (EST)
I don't think that affects traffic to anything other than his own essays, so I think more freedom on this is best. We want to avoid here the stifling aspects of Wikipedia. Thanks for understanding. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:Aschlafly (talk)
Well it does affect traffic. When I introduce terms to him that he's never heard (Like "multipolarity" for instance), and writes a half dozen screeds attacking multipolarity whiuch he knows nothing aobut, and I Google the term, his crap comes up and mine is suppressed.
That's all he's done for the past six months, is use terms he never heard of that I write about, than spam them into a dozen Essays trashing the concepts with neocon sources, promoting himself while also having an algorithm that specifically suppresses my content. And it's by cheating = blatant self-promotion - that he gets away with it. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 22:14, December 22, 2023 (EST)