Difference between revisions of "User talk:Aschlafly"

Revision as of 15:38, January 20, 2024

Welcome to Aschlafly's talk page. Please place complaints about other users or other trolling content at Conservapedia:User complaints. If Andy is interested in hearing your complaint, he will respond there. Thank you.

Can you explain this?

Can you explain what happened with User:BHathorn as far as his recent blocking spree and apparent vandalism of templates?

It seems puzzling given his past editing. He appears to be a longstanding good-faith editor. Maybe if you have the time to look at his past edits that will explain things.

I have a deadline to meet so I don't have time to investigate matters. But via email I did ask you to look into things. Conservative (talk) 07:54, January 4, 2024 (EST)

Please finish the unblocking of people. I did as much unblocking as I could do. Conservative (talk) 07:56, January 4, 2024 (EST)

I am guessing that his password was hacked. I will let you come up with the best solution to solve this issue. User: PeterKa blocked him for a year. I changed the block to 3 days so that gives you time to come up with a solution. I also gave User:BHathorn my Conservapedia email address on his talk page. Conservative (talk) 09:43, January 4, 2024 (EST)

P.S. The User: Conservative account password is unhackable. Rest assured that no hacker will ever hack it! The odds of the dead atheist movement resurrecting is likelier and that is nearly impossible! Conservative (talk) 10:01, January 4, 2024 (EST)

It appears as if there was a hacker who hacked into User:BHathorn's account. The hacker appears to be from a northern state in the USA. I am awaiting hearing a reply from User:BHathorn. Conservative (talk) 10:27, January 4, 2024 (EST)

I unblocked User:BHathorn. He was hacked and he changed his password. I confirmed that the new IP address was from the right editor. Conservative (talk) 10:51, January 4, 2024 (EST)

Re: Thank you

Not a problem. Unfortunately, I was in bed asleep at the time that hacker/vandal managed to seize control of BHathorn's account to go on that vandalism/blocking spree so I didn't get to catch it as it happened, but I did manage to unblock the accounts that had not already been unblocked (including your own) after getting blocked during the vandalism spree. As to the templates that got vandalized (via the vandal putting up that fake message at the top of the page in such a way as to block access to the editing tools as well as the view of the templates themselves), I think those edits should be oversighted to prevent their being shown in the editing history (if I were able to do oversighting myself on those edits, I would, but I don't have Oversight user rights). Northwest (talk) 02:25, January 5, 2024 (EST)

Tremendous work, Northwest, thank you! Oversighting is a great idea for this at a convenient time.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 02:55, January 5, 2024 (EST)

RINO Of The Year, 2023

Hello Mr. Schlafly,

I am wondering if I could declare Lindsey Graham RINO of the Year. I created the page late this year and there has not been much discussion. However, Lindsey Graham was suggested as being a good pick for RINO of the Year. I hope you had a wonderful Christmas and New Year!

Thank you!--TheNewRight (talk) 23:08, January 5, 2024 (EST)

Yes, terrific choice for the winner of this ignominious award! Please post!--Andy Schlafly (talk) 23:59, January 5, 2024 (EST)

TheNewRight, I've checked your contribution history. Since the article's creation on Monday, you have made zero effort to reach out to other editors and make sure they at least knew about the article's existence. That's why there hasn't been much discussion. Until now, nobody except you knew about the article's existence.

Now that I myself know about of the article's existence, I will be making my own contributions to the article sometime this weekend. In the meantime, I strongly suggest you start promoting the article on the main talk page so other editors have an opportunity to contribute as well.--Geopolitician (talk) 01:34, January 6, 2024 (EST)

A question.

Is there a reason Sodomy doesn't simply redirect to Sodom? Cazle (talk) 17:09, January 11, 2024 (EST)

Fixed.

User: Cazle, thank for the input. In the future, don't be reticent to take the initiative and fix Conservapedia shortcomings yourself. Conservative (talk) 17:28, January 11, 2024 (EST)

I couldn't, I don't have the necessary permissions. Cazle (talk) 17:33, January 11, 2024 (EST)

Thank you. Cazle (talk) 17:34, January 11, 2024 (EST)

Please give the hacked user account SkipCaptcha ‎permission

Andy, please give the User:BHathorn2 account SkipCaptcha ‎permission.

I appreciate you giving the User:BHathorn this permission, but I actually wanted it for the User:BHathorn2 account. Conservative (talk) 02:35, January 12, 2024 (EST)

I did this correctly as requested, thanks.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 02:57, January 12, 2024 (EST)

I got my new glasses, but I need to get them fixed. I am awaiting to getting this issue fixed. Bear with me in the meantime! Conservative (talk) 03:02, January 12, 2024 (EST)

Please give this user picture upload rights. I gave him some coaching on the licensing/posting issue

Please give NishantXavier picture upload rights. I gave him some coaching on the licensing/posting issue.

In addition, I will look at some of the pictures he posts to make sure he is doing things right.

Also, I gave him various sources of public domain pictures and Creative Commons type pictures on his user talk pages so he should be able to find lot of pictures. Conservative (talk) 22:25, January 15, 2024 (EST)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 <center>''Welcome to Aschlafly's talk page. Please place complaints about other users or other [[trolling]] content at [[Conservapedia:User complaints]]. If Andy is interested in hearing your complaint, he will respond there. Thank you.''</center>
-==Topic ban==
-Please impose a [[topic ban]] on [[User:Conservative]]'s [[foreign policy]] and defense related contributions, at least through 2024 [[primary election]] season. His deliberate [[CP:Trolling]], "employing redundant arguments intended to occupy and waste the time, efforts, or energies of other users or to '''distract them from productive editing''' and making mainspace article contributions" occupies a minimum of 3 hours, and sometimes as much as 6-8 hours of my time DAILY, prohibiting me from making substantive contributions on election and foreign policy matters.
-User:Conservative has stated on dozens of occasions, over many years, that he has no interest in [[politics]], and has repeatedly violated his own pledges to cease contributing on those subjects. His contributions are solely and specifically intended to irritate and waste the time of other editors, a violation of CP Commandments and Guidelines.
-I have no objection to him contributing on election matters, where he can spew his [[neocon]] [[racist]] content to his heart's content. Thank you.  [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]</sup> 17:27, December 28, 2023 (EST)
-:Andy told you on your talk page: "...I think there should be more leeway for strong editors to create essays and categorize them as they think best. That includes you too. Essays are a valuable part of this website (in contrast with the tyranny at Wikipedia which prohibits them). The essay author is easily identified from the entry history.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 21:26, December 22, 2023 (EST)"
-:Andy likes that I create essays (including political essays) - some of which have tens of thousands or thousands of page views. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 17:43, December 28, 2023 (EST)
-::I have evidence that you are running a bot on some of your trolling Essays to rack up page views. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]</sup> 17:47, December 28, 2023 (EST)
-:::Disagreeing with you is not trolling. This is not RobSmithPedia. You are not infallible and you are not God. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 17:52, December 28, 2023 (EST)
-::(ec) Note: You do not dispute the allegation that you are contributing "neocon racist content" to [[Conservapedia]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]</sup> 17:47, December 28, 2023 (EST)
-{{warning collapse|reason=Off topic. We are not talking about your atheism content or anything else|content=::::And people like my content - especially my [[atheism]] article which has the highest page view count article on the website. My articles on homosexuality are very popular too. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 17:57, December 28, 2023 (EST)
-And just because you throw out a spurious and gossipy allegation about me, it does not obligate me to respond. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:00, December 28, 2023 (EST)}}
-Let's examine [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Conservative/motivational&curid=122579&diff=2014055&oldid=2012688 this edit today User:Conservative calls "motivational":] "The only way we can compete with the Eastern Bloc...". The "Eastern Bloc" was a political and military alliance that ceased to exist in 1991. The ideology of the "Eastern Bloc" - [[communism]] - was defeated by the [[Russian Orthodox Church]] in 1991, yet User:Conservative created another [[Russophobic]] cut n paste screed this morning based upon highly dubious, racist, and neocon sources with false, inflammatory, and exaggerated information.
-One can only assume User:Conservative is "motivated" by the same racial fear and disdain for the "Slavic hordes" of [[Eastern Europe]] that his sources broadcast.[[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]</sup> 18:14, December 28, 2023 (EST)
-{{warning collapse|reason=Non-responsive|content=:If you have a good case, feel free to create a counteressay. Andy likes content - not talk, talk, talk, talk. Godspeed. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:18, December 28, 2023 (EST)
-::Your challenges to create counteressays violates the clause of "employing redundant arguments intended to occupy and waste the time, efforts, or energies of other users". Your challenges have been answered many times, yet you re-employ that argument.
-::"Counteressays" would '''"occupy and waste the time''', efforts, or energies of other users" in spurious arguments. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]</sup> 18:28, December 28, 2023 (EST)
-::Furthermore, this is precisely why I make this appeal to Andy - your maliciously motivated trolling is an impediment to my creation of content. And your racist, neocon screeds nobody should consider conservative, or acceptable "content" for [[Conservapedia]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]</sup> 18:37, December 28, 2023 (EST)}}
-[[Conservapedia]] Essay space should not be a platform for [[Liberal fascist|Liberal fascism]], and that is all [[User:Conservative#General_international_politics_essays|User:Conservative's Geopolitical Essays]] amount to, not based upon any knowledge or expertise in the area, but rather motivated by spite and a personal vendetta toward another editor. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]</sup> 13:03, December 29, 2023 (EST)
 == Can you explain this? ==